Multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework for energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties. Part 2: improved extension theory

PurposeThe concept of sustainability and sustainable development has been widely incorporated in energy and industrial systems. This paper is the second part of a two-paper series dealing with multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment of alternative energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties.MethodsThe criteria system including four macroscopic aspects (environmental, safety, social and economic aspects) has been developed for sustainability assessment of energy and industrial systems. An improved extension theory which can address interval decision-making matrix has been developed for determining the sustainability degree of the energy and industrial systems.Results and discussionThe weights of the criteria for sustainability assessment are the first part of the two-paper series. An illustrative case has been studied by the proposed multi-criteria decision-making method, and the sustainability of six alternative options for the production of a 1-t product was investigated. The sustainability degree of these six alternative options can be determined by the proposed method.Conclusions and perspectivesA methodology for multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment of energy and industrial options has been developed in this study, the traditional extension theory has been modified to deal with the uncertainty problems and the proposed method can rank the alternative energy and industrial systems with the decision-making matrix in which the data of the alternatives with respect to the evaluation criteria are intervals. In the improved extension theory, sustainability has been dived into five grades: excellent, good, satisfied, barely adequate and fail. According to the method for calculating the weights of the criteria for sustainability assessment proposed in part 1, these weights were used to calculate the integrated dependent degree which is a measure of what degree an alternative belongs to the classical fields. An optimal programming model for maximizing the satisfied degree has been developed to rank the sustainability sequence of the alternative options and determine the sustainability degree of each alternative.

[1]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Mitigating pollution of hazardous materials from WEEE of China: Portfolio selection for a sustainable future based on multi-criteria decision making , 2015 .

[2]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Youyin Jing,et al.  Application of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and extenics theory for building energy conservation assessment , 2009 .

[4]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[5]  K. L. Edwards,et al.  VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria , 2013 .

[6]  Yasushi Umeda,et al.  Lifecycle scenario design for product end-of-life strategy , 2012 .

[7]  Y. Asiedu,et al.  Product life cycle cost analysis: State of the art review , 1998 .

[8]  Ruey-Chyn Tsaur,et al.  Decision risk analysis for an interval TOPSIS method , 2011, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for technology selection for emissions reduction from shipping under uncertainties , 2015 .

[10]  M. Sayadi,et al.  Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers , 2009 .

[11]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Fuzzy Multi-actor Multi-criteria Decision Making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production , 2013 .

[12]  Helen H. Lou,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of Industrial Systems , 2004 .

[13]  Mohammad Izadikhah,et al.  An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[14]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Prioritization of bioethanol production pathways in China based on life cycle sustainability assessment and multicriteria decision-making , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators , 2012 .

[16]  A. Holma,et al.  Assessing environmental impacts of biomass production chains - application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). , 2012 .

[17]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Stochastic decision modeling for sustainable pavement designs , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  AHP based life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) framework: a case study of six storey wood frame and concrete frame buildings in Vancouver , 2015 .

[19]  G. Alefeld,et al.  Introduction to Interval Computation , 1983 .

[20]  Violeta Motuzienė,et al.  Construction solutions for energy efficient single-family house based on its life cycle multi-criteria analysis: a case study , 2016 .

[21]  Kasun Hewage,et al.  Sustainability assessment framework for low rise commercial buildings: life cycle impact index-based approach , 2016, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[23]  Cheng-Wu Chen,et al.  Combining risk assessment, life cycle assessment, and multi-criteria decision analysis to estimate environmental aspects in environmental management system , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Social Life Cycle Assessment: State of the art and challenges for supporting product policies , 2015 .

[25]  Alessandra Zamagni,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management systems with an application to a case study in Thailand , 2012, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[27]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Role prioritization of hydrogen production technologies for promoting hydrogen economy in the current state of China , 2015 .

[28]  Anthony Halog,et al.  Solar Photovoltaic Development in Australia—A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Study , 2015 .

[29]  Herry Suprajitno.  Linear Programming with Interval Arithmetic , 2010 .

[30]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[31]  Zheng Liu,et al.  Technology Evaluation and Decision Making for Sustainability Enhancement of Industrial Systems Under Uncertainty , 2012 .

[32]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) for selection of sewer pipe materials , 2015, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[33]  Hua Jiang,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of fuels , 2007 .

[34]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Grey-based PROMETHEE II with application to evaluation of source water protection strategies , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Sustainability Decision Support Framework for Industrial System Prioritization , 2016 .

[36]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  A grey-based group decision-making methodology for the selection of hydrogen technologies in life cycle sustainability perspective , 2012 .

[37]  Beijia Huang,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of ground source heat pump in Shanghai, China , 2016 .

[38]  William K Townend.  Editorial. Zero waste: an aspiration or an oxymoron? , 2010, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[39]  E. Benetto,et al.  Life cycle assessment of coal by-products based electric power production scenarios , 2004 .

[40]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Service supply chain environmental performance evaluation using grey based hybrid MCDM approach , 2015 .

[41]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity options for the UK , 2012 .

[42]  Günter Wozny,et al.  A Modular Approach to Sustainability Assessment and Decision Support in Chemical Process Design , 2010 .

[43]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul , 2010 .