Communication Media Selection for Remote Interaction of Ad Hoc Groups

Abstract Nowadays work is becoming predominantly distributed, bringing significant challenges to effective communication of geographically dispersed groups. In fact, multisite work presents considerable loss of opportunities for rich interaction and a very substantial reduction in frequency of both formal and informal communication between coworkers. While communicating face-to-face (F2F) by speech is easy for individuals, conducting a long-running, productive conversation through the digital medium is difficult, especially as the group size increases. The difficulty of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and collaboration stands in stark contrast to our natural ability to easily communicate and collaborate with one another in the physical world. As such, there is a need to further our understanding of the effectiveness of the many available synchronous and asynchronous communication media (e.g., e-mail, videoconferencing, or specialized collaboration tools) to support activities of distributed teams. However, not only media properties (e.g., synchronicity) affect the performance of groups collaborating from a distance but also the characteristics of groups (e.g., size, history) and tasks (e.g., idea generation, decision making) play a key role. In this chapter, we first present a survey on the group-, task-, and media-related theories that are relevant for the selection of the most appropriate synchronous communication media to better support distributed ad hoc groups, that is, short-term groups with neither a history of previous collaborations nor expectation of future ones. Then, we consistently combine all the reviewed theories to create two general models that, respectively, can help researchers to manage the context of experiments on remote group collaboration, and distributed groups themselves to evaluate, compare, and select the most appropriate fits between the task at a hand and the media available.

[1]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[2]  B. Tuckman DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[4]  Daniela E. Damian,et al.  An exploratory study of facilitation in distributed requirements engineering , 2003, Requirements Engineering.

[5]  Audris Mockus,et al.  An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed , 2001, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2001.

[6]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Musings on Telepresence and Virtual Presence , 1992, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Learning to work in distributed global teams , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Didar Zowghi,et al.  Requirements Elicitation: A Survey of Techniques, Approaches, and Tools , 2005 .

[9]  Daniela E. Damian,et al.  RE challenges in multi-site software development organisations , 2003, Requirements Engineering.

[10]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness , 1998, MIS Q..

[11]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[12]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Socio-Psychological Aspects of Group Processes , 2008 .

[13]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Case and field studies of group support systems: an empirical assessment , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[15]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[16]  J. George,et al.  Ad hoc versus established groups in an electronic meeting system environment , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[17]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[18]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[19]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[20]  Filippo Lanubile,et al.  Tool support for geographically dispersed inspection teams , 2003, Softw. Process. Improv. Pract..

[21]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Introducing instant messaging and chat in the workplace , 2002, CHI.

[22]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[23]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[24]  J. Hackman,et al.  Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams , 2003 .

[26]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction, third edition , 2004 .

[27]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Support Systems: New Perspectives , 1992 .

[28]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  Engineering and Managing Software Requirements , 2005 .

[29]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[30]  Ljiljana Stojanović,et al.  An ontology-based approach for competence bundling and composition of ad-hoc teams in an organisation , 2004 .

[31]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[32]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  The Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1995 .

[33]  Filippo Lanubile A P2P Toolset for Distributed Requirements Elicitation , 2003 .

[34]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Requirements engineering: a roadmap , 2000, ICSE '00.

[35]  Stefan Decker,et al.  On P2P collaboration infrastructures , 2005, 14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise (WETICE'05).

[36]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[37]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[38]  Ernest G. Bormann,et al.  The paradox and promise of small group research , 1970 .

[39]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[40]  Mildred L. G. Shaw,et al.  Empirical studies of computer support for distributed requirements negotiation , 2001 .

[41]  R. Daft,et al.  Language and Organization , 1979 .

[42]  Filippo Lanubile,et al.  A DECENTRALIZED CONFERENCING TOOL FOR AD HOC DISTRIBUTED WORKGROUPS , 2004 .

[43]  Daniel B. Horn,et al.  Grounding needs: achieving common ground via lightweight chat in large, distributed, ad-hoc groups , 2005, CHI.

[44]  Bo Leuf,et al.  The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web , 2001 .

[45]  Gerald M. Phillips,et al.  Teaching group discussion via computer‐mediated communication , 1989 .

[46]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[47]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[48]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[49]  J. Davitz,et al.  A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  Jay Hall,et al.  A comparison of decision-making performances in established and ad hoc groups. , 1966 .

[51]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Beyond media richness: an empirical test of media synchronicity theory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[52]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[53]  Brian E. Mennecke,et al.  Tasks matter: modeling group task processes in experimental CSCW research , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[54]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Human-computer interaction (2nd ed.) , 1998 .

[55]  A. Dennis,et al.  Paradox of richness: a cognitive model of media choice , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[56]  J. McGrath,et al.  Groups Interacting with Technology: Ideas, Evidence, Issues and an Agenda , 1993 .

[57]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  An experimental examination of group history and group support system use on information sharing performance and user perceptions , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[59]  Didar Zowghi,et al.  Requirements Engineering challenges in multi-site software development organizations , 2004 .

[60]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Laboratory and Field Research in the Study of Electronic Meeting Systems , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[62]  Johann H. Schlichter,et al.  Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Introduction to Distributed Applications , 2010 .

[63]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don't , 1998, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[64]  Wendy A. Kellogg,et al.  Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes , 2000, TCHI.

[65]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[66]  L. Dosier,et al.  Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings , 1997 .

[67]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[68]  Jacques Wainer,et al.  Groupware and computer supported cooperative work , 1999 .

[69]  B. E. Wynne,et al.  The Implications of Group Development and History for Group Support System Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[70]  N. K. Muir,et al.  The Richness Imperative and Cognitive Style , 1990 .

[71]  Jerry Fjermestad,et al.  Challenging Group Support Systems Research: The Case for Strategic Decision Making , 1997 .

[72]  John R. Carlson Channel expansion theory: A dynamic view of media and information richness perceptions , 1994 .

[73]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[74]  Fabio Calefato Peer-to-peer remote conferencing , 2004, ICSE 2004.

[75]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Task/technology fit and the effectiveness of group support systems: evidence in the context of tasks requiring domain specific knowledge , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[76]  Li-Te Cheng,et al.  Supporting activity-centric collaboration through peer-to-peer shared objects , 2003, GROUP '03.

[77]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  What is chat doing in the workplace? , 2002, CSCW '02.