Evaluation of reaction time performance and subjective workload during whole-body vibration exposure while seated in upright and twisted postures with and without armrests

Abstract There is little knowledge on performance during vibration exposure combined with occupational hazards such as bent or twisted postures. In addition, little information is available on the effective use of armrests during performance-related tasks. This paper investigates the influence of sitting in different working postures on the reaction time and perceived workload of subjects exposed to whole-body vibration. Twenty-one subjects were exposed to 1–20 Hz random vibration in the vertical and fore-and-aft directions. A choice reaction time task was completed while seated in four posture conditions: upright or twisted, with and without armrests. Following the task, participants completed the NASA TLX workload assessment. Posture combined with whole-body vibration exposure had a significant influence on the ability to perform the task. The combined environmental stressors significantly degraded the performance; not only did their reaction times become compromised, the participants’ workload demand also increased. The most severe decrement in performance and workload was experienced while seated in a twisted posture with no armrest support. The inclusion of armrests significantly improved the participants’ ability to complete the task with a lower workload demand. Relevance to industry Twisted postures have been observed in a variety of machine operations and it is important to determine their influence on operator workload. Many off-road machines have suspension seats fitted with armrests; this paper demonstrates that armrest support provides additional benefits for off-road machine operators under combined environmental stressors.

[1]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[2]  M J Buekers,et al.  Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[3]  Rani Lueder,et al.  Hard facts about soft machines : the ergonomics of seating , 1994 .

[4]  Daniel P. J. Bruneau,et al.  A self-analysis of the NASA-TLX workload measure , 2007, Ergonomics.

[5]  Gregory Neely,et al.  Cognitive performance and subjective experience during combined exposures to whole-body vibration and noise , 2004, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[6]  Leon Straker,et al.  The effect of shoulder posture on performance, discomfort and muscle fatigue whilst working on a visual display unit , 1997 .

[7]  D. Harrison,et al.  Sitting biomechanics, part II: optimal car driver's seat and optimal driver's spinal model. , 2000, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[8]  M. H. Pope,et al.  A REVIEW OF THE BIOMECHANICS AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF WORKING POSTURES (IT ISN'T ALWAYS VIBRATION WHICH IS TO BLAME!) , 1998 .

[9]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[10]  N K Kittusamy,et al.  An ergonomic evaluation of excavating operations: a pilot study. , 2001, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  Li Guang Tian,et al.  Investigation of eyestrain and working capacity for female crane operators , 1996 .

[12]  I. Deary,et al.  Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[13]  Neil J. Mansfield,et al.  Inter-cycle variation in whole-body vibration exposures of operators driving track-type loader machines , 2006 .

[14]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  A review of the effects of vibration on visual acuity and continuous manual control, part I: Visual acuity , 1978 .

[15]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Review of the effects of translational whole-body vibration on continuous manual control performance , 1989 .

[16]  Ali A. Landauer,et al.  Sex Differences in Decision and Movement Time , 1981 .

[17]  D. Harrison,et al.  Sitting biomechanics part I: review of the literature. , 1999, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[18]  G Torle Tracking performance under random acceleration: effects of control dynamics. , 1965, Ergonomics.

[19]  Mirjam Münch,et al.  Gender and age differences in psychomotor vigilance performance under differential sleep pressure conditions , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  A review of the effects of vibration on visual acuity and continuous manual control, part II: Continuous manual control , 1978 .

[21]  Ali A. Landauer,et al.  Sex difference in choice reaction time , 1980 .

[22]  M Bovenzi,et al.  Low-back disorders in agricultural tractor drivers exposed to whole-body vibration and postural stress. , 1994, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[24]  Robert Rogers,et al.  Effect of stiffness and movement speed on selected dynamic torque characteristics of hydraulic-actuation joystick controls for heavy vehicles , 2006, Ergonomics.

[25]  Paul A. Bell,et al.  Effects of Heat, Social Facilitation, Sex Differences, and Task Difficulty on Reaction Time , 1982 .

[26]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .