Applied Hermeneutics and Qualitative Safety Data: The CIRAS Project

This article describes the new qualitative methodology developed for use in CIRAS (Confidential Incident Reporting and Analysis System), the confidential database set up for the UK railways by the University of Strathclyde. CIRAS is a project in which qualitative safety data are disidentified and then stored and analysed in a central database. Due to the confidential nature of the data provided, conventional (positivist) methods of checking their accuracy are not applicable; therefore a new methodology was developed - the Applied Hermeneutic Methodology (AHM). Based on Paul Ricoeur's `hermeneutic arc', this methodology uses appropriate computer software to provide a method of analysis that can be shown to be reliable (in the sense that consensus in interpretations between different interpreters can be demonstrated). Moreover, given that the classifiers of the textual elements can be represented in numeric form, AHM crosses the `qualitative-quantitative divide'. It is suggested that this methodology is more rigorous and philosophically coherent than existing methodologies and that it has implications for all areas of the social sciences where qualitative texts are analysed.

[1]  L. Suzuki,et al.  Using Qualitative Methods in Psychology , 1999 .

[2]  B. Turner Causes of Disaster: Sloppy Management , 1994 .

[3]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[4]  J P Doidge,et al.  Successful health and safety management , 1997, Perfusion.

[5]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Evolution of Crises: Crisis Precursors , 1991 .

[6]  D. Norman,et al.  New technology and human error , 1989 .

[7]  M. Meehan General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications , 1969 .

[8]  Michael Frese,et al.  Errors in Training Computer Skills: on the Positive Function of Errors , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  David Okrent,et al.  Man-made disasters , 1998 .

[10]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[11]  G.W.M. Rauterberg,et al.  About faults, errors, and other dangerous things , 1997, Proceedings 6th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication. RO-MAN'97 SENDAI.

[12]  P. Ricoeur Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences , 1981 .

[13]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[14]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  T. Winograd and F. Flores, Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[15]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[16]  D. Lucas,et al.  Chapter 11 – ORGANISATIONAL ASPECTS OF NEAR MISS REPORTING , 1991 .

[17]  Paul Ricoeur,et al.  The Model of the Text: Meaningful Action Considered as a Text , 1973 .

[18]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[19]  Donald H. Taylor,et al.  THE HERMENEUTICS OF ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY , 1981 .

[20]  Simon Reynolds,et al.  Learning from Disasters: A Management Approach , 1997 .

[21]  N. Rescher,et al.  The coherence theory of truth , 1973 .

[22]  Celestine A. Ntuen,et al.  Human Interaction with Complex Systems: Conceptual Principles and Design Practice , 1996 .

[23]  N. Pidgeon The Limits to Safety? Culture, Politics, Learning and Man–Made Disasters , 1997 .

[24]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[25]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[26]  R. Bernstein Beyond objectivism and relativism , 1983 .

[27]  Newton C. A. da Costa,et al.  A coherence theory of truth , 2005 .

[28]  Richard Smoke,et al.  Anatomy of a crisis , 1985 .

[29]  Susan Hekman,et al.  Hermeneutics and the Sociology of Knowledge , 1988 .

[30]  G.W.M. Rauterberg HUMAN INTERACTION WITH COMPLEX SYSTEMS : Conceptual Principles and Design Practice by , 1995 .

[31]  A. Ross,et al.  The Creation of a New Minor Event Coding System , 2002, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[32]  T. W. van der Schaaf,et al.  Near Miss Reporting as a Safety Tool , 1991 .

[33]  James G. March,et al.  How Decisions Happen in Organizations , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  G. Lakoff Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[35]  P. Shrivastava Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis , 1987 .

[36]  Daniel J. Svyantek,et al.  Organizational Attractors: A Chaos Theory Explanation of Why Cultural Change Efforts Often Fail , 1993 .

[37]  D. Rennie Qualitative research: A matter of hermeneutics and the sociology of knowledge. , 1999 .

[38]  R S Unger,et al.  Anatomy of a crisis. , 1989, Ontario dentist.

[39]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[40]  John C. Mallery,et al.  Hermeneutics: From Textual Explication to Computer Understanding? , 1986 .