Comparison of Hipparcos Trigonometric and Mount Wilson Spectroscopic Parallaxes for 90 Subgiants that Defined the Class in 1935

A history is given of the discovery between 1914 and 1935 of stars of intermediate luminosity between giants and dwarfs with spectral types between G0 to K3. The Mt Wilson spectroscopists identified about 90 such stars in their 1935 summary paper of spectroscopic absolute magnitudes for 4179 stars. Called "subgiants" by Str\"omberg, these 90 stars defined the group at the time. The position of the Mt Wilson subgiants in the HR diagram caused difficulties in comparisons of high weight trigonometric parallaxes being measured and with Russell's prevailing evolution proposal, and critics questioned the reality of the Mt Wilson subgiants. We compare, star-by-star, the Mt Wilson spectroscopic absolute magnitudes of the 90 stars defining their sample against those absolute magnitudes derived from Hipparcos (HIP) trigonometric parallaxes. We address concerns over biases in the Mt Wilson calibration sample and biases created by the adopted methodology for calibration. Historically, these concerns were sufficient to discredit the discovery of subgiants in the Mt Wilson sample. However, as shown here, the majority of the Mount Wilson stars identified as subgiants that also have reliable HIP trigonometric parallaxes do lie among the subgiant sequence in the HIP HR diagram. Moreover, no significant offset is seen between the M(V) brightnesses derived from the Mt Wilson spectroscopic parallaxes and the M(V) values derived from Hipparcos trigonometric parallaxes with a fractional error of 10%, which confirms in an impressive manner the efficacy of the original Mt Wilson assessments. The existence of subgiants proved that Russell's contraction proposal for stellar evolution from giants to the main sequence was incorrect. Instead, Gamow's 1944 unpublished conjecture that subgiants are post main-sequence stars just having left the main sequence was very nearly correct but was a decade before its time.

[1]  H. N. Russell The New, or Modified, Form of the Theory of Stellar Evolution , 1925 .

[2]  James Liebert,et al.  The Age, Extinction, and Distance of the Old, Metal-rich Open Cluster NGC 6791 , 1998, astro-ph/9812097.

[3]  O. Eggen Colors, luminosities, and motions of the nearer G-type stars. , 1964 .

[4]  G. Strömberg The Distribution of Absolute Magnitudes among K and M Stars Brighter than the Sixth Apparent Magnitude as Determined from Peculiar Velocities , 1930 .

[5]  A. Sandage The Population Concept, Globular Clusters, Subdwarfs, Ages, and the Collapse of the Galaxy , 1986 .

[6]  Nolan R. Walborn,et al.  Stellar Spectral Classification , 2009 .

[7]  W. S. Adams,et al.  The luminosities and parallaxes of five hundred stars. , 1917 .

[8]  H. N. Russell The Problem of Stellar Evolution , 1925, Nature.

[9]  Pieter Johannes van Rhijn Spectroscopic absolute magnitudes of Mount Wilson Contributions No. 511 and their Probable Errors , 1939 .

[10]  Allan R. Sandage The Color-Magnitude Diagrams of Galactic and Globular Clusters and their Interpretation as Age Groups , 1958 .

[11]  B. Skiff,et al.  VizieR Online Data Catalog , 2009 .

[12]  O. Eggen THE MASSES OF THE SUBGIANTS , 1955 .

[13]  A. Sandage,et al.  On the Existence of Subdwarfs in the (MBol, log Te)-Diagram , 1959 .

[14]  M. Saha On a physical theory of stellar spectra , 1921 .

[15]  W. S. Adams Investigations in Stellar Spectroscopy: II. A Spectroscopic Method of Determining Stellar Parallaxes. , 1916, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. Sandage Centennial History of the Carnegie Institution of Washington , 2005 .

[17]  J. Kovalevsky,et al.  FIRST RESULTS FROM HIPPARCOS , 1998 .

[18]  Accidental and Systematic Errors in Spectroscopic Absolute Magnitudes for Dwarf G_{0}-K_{2} Stars. , 1940 .

[19]  Herbert Malamud,et al.  Landolt-Bornstein: Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology , 1985 .

[20]  W. S. Adams,et al.  The parallaxes of 1646 stars derived by the spectroscopic method. , 1921 .

[21]  Thomas E. Lutz,et al.  ON THE USE OF TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAXES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF LUMINOSITY SYSTEMS: THEORY , 1973 .

[22]  T. Lutz On the use of trigonometric parallaxes for the calibration of luminosity systems – II , 1979 .

[23]  F. V. Leeuwen,et al.  Hipparcos, the New Reduction of the Raw Data , 2007 .

[24]  J. Herskowitz,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA , 1996, Current Biology.

[25]  W S Adams Investigations in Stellar Spectroscopy: III. Application of a Spectroscopic Method of Determining Stellar Distances to Stars of Measured Parallax. , 1916, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  G. Strömberg The Relation Between Absolute Magnitude and Reduced Proper Motion, and the Mean Errors in the Spectroscopic Absolute Magnitudes, for Stars of Spectral Classes G and K. , 1939 .

[27]  Allan Sandage,et al.  Photometric Data for the Old Galactic Cluster NGC 188. , 1962 .

[28]  O. C. Wilson,et al.  H and K Emission in Late-Type Stars: Dependence of Line Width on Luminosity and Related Topics. , 1957 .

[29]  W. S. Adams,et al.  No. 319. The absolute magnitudes and parallaxes of 410 stars of type M. , 1926 .

[30]  O. Eggen Distribution of the nearer bright stars in the color-luminosity array. , 1957 .

[31]  R. Hanson A practical method to improve luminosity calibrations from trigonometric parallaxes. , 1979 .

[32]  T. Kinman The Star Cluster NGC 6791. , 1965 .

[33]  W. W. Morgan On the Spectral Classification of the Stars of Types a to K , 1937 .

[34]  J. B. Oke The Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram for F5-K2 Stars with the Most Accurate Absolute Magnitudes. , 1959 .

[35]  G. Strömberg The Distribution of Absolute Magnitudes among Stars Brighter than the Sixth Apparent Magnitude , 1932 .

[36]  A. Sandage,et al.  The Age of the Oldest Stars in the Local Galactic Disk from Hipparcos Parallaxes of G and K Subgiants , 2003, astro-ph/0307128.

[37]  A. Sandage,et al.  Bias Properties of Extragalactic Distance Indicators. XI. Methods to Correct for Observational Selection Bias for RR Lyrae Absolute Magnitudes from Trigonometric Parallaxes Expected from the Full-Sky Astrometric Mapping Explorer Satellite , 2002, astro-ph/0201381.

[38]  Henryk Baranowski "Journal for the History of Astronomy", r. 1: 1970 i 2: 1971 / Henryk Baranowski. , 1971 .

[39]  C. Francis The Lutz–Kelker paradox , 2014, 1406.6580.

[40]  W. S. Adams,et al.  The Spectroscopic Absolute Magnitudes and Parallaxes of 4179 Stars , 1935 .

[41]  William Wilson Morgan,et al.  Stellar Spectra. (Scientific Books: An Atlas of Stellar Spectra with an Outline of Spectral Classification) , 1943 .

[42]  A. Sandage,et al.  The galactic cluster M 67 and its significance for stellar evolution. , 1955 .

[43]  Walter S. Adams,et al.  Some spectral criteria for the determination of absolute stellar magnitudes. , 1914 .

[44]  A. Blaauw MY CRUISE THROUGH THE WORLD OF ASTRONOMY , 2004 .

[45]  P. Bruggencate Sternhaufen : ihr Bau, ihre Stellung zum Sternsystem und ihre Bedeutung für die Kosmogonie , 2022 .

[46]  O. Eggen Stellar Groups, V. Luminosities, Motions and Masses of the Late-type Subgiants , 1960 .

[47]  Henk Smith Is there really a Lutz—Kelker bias? Reconsidering calibration with trigonometric parallaxes , 2003 .

[48]  H. L. Johnson,et al.  Astronomical Measurements in the Infrared , 1966 .

[49]  F. V. Leeuwen Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction , 2007, 0708.1752.