Virtual Monoenergetic Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: Optimization of Kiloelectron Volt Settings in Head and Neck Cancer

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects on objective and subjective image quality of virtual monoenergetic reconstructions at various energy levels of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in patients with head and neck cancer. Materials and MethodsWe included 71 (53 men, 18 women; age, 59.3 ± 12.0 years; range, 33–90 years) patients with biopsy-proven untreated primary (n = 55) or recurrent (n = 16) squamous cell carcinoma who underwent head and neck DECT. Images were reconstructed with a linear blending setting emulating 120 kV acquisition (M_0.3; 30% of 80 kV, 70% of 140 kV spectrum) and as virtual monoenergetic images with photon energies of 40, 60, 80, and 100 keV. Attenuation of lesion, various anatomic landmarks, and image noise were objectively measured, and lesion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated. Two independent blinded radiologists subjectively rated each image series using a 5-point grading scale regarding overall image quality, lesion delineation, image sharpness, and image noise. ResultsTumor attenuation peaked at 40 keV (140.2 ± 42.6 HU) followed by the 60 keV (121.7 ± 25.5 HU) and M_0.3 series (102.7 ± 22.3; all P < 0.001). However, the calculated lesion CNR was highest in the 60 keV reconstructions (12.45 ± 7.17), 80 keV reconstructions (8.66 ± 6.58), and M_0.3 series (5.21 ± 3.15; all P < 0.001) and superior to the other monoenergetic series (all P < 0.001). Subjective image analysis was highest for the 60 keV series regarding overall image quality (4.22; &kgr; = 0.411) and lesion delineation (4.35; &kgr; = 0.459) followed by the M_0.3 series (3.81; &kgr; = 0.394; 3.77; &kgr; = 0.451; all P < 0.001). Image sharpness showed no significant difference between both series (3.81 vs 3.79; P = 0.78). Image noise was rated superior in the 80 and 100 keV series (4.31 vs 4.34; P = 0.522). ConclusionsCompared with linearly blended images, virtual monoenergetic reconstructions of DECT data at 60 keV significantly improve lesion enhancement and CNR, subjective overall image quality, and tumor delineation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

[1]  M G Mack,et al.  Image Quality and Radiation Dose of Dual-Energy CT of the Head and Neck Compared with a Standard 120-kVp Acquisition , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  S. Fujii,et al.  Usefulness of monochromatic imaging with metal artifact reduction software for computed tomography angiography after intracranial aneurysm coil embolization , 2014, Acta radiologica.

[3]  D. Sahani,et al.  Virtual monochromatic reconstruction of dual-energy unenhanced head CT at 65-75 keV maximizes image quality compared with conventional polychromatic CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[4]  T. Yamanaka,et al.  Evaluation of cartilage invasion by laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with dual-energy CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[5]  B. Choi,et al.  Image Fusion in Dual Energy Computed Tomography for Detection of Hypervascular Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Phantom and Preliminary Studies , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[6]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Optimization of keV-settings in abdominal and lower extremity dual-source dual-energy CT angiography determined with virtual monoenergetic imaging. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[7]  B. Schmidt,et al.  Dual Energy CT With Nonlinear Image Blending Improves Visualization of Delayed Myocardial Contrast Enhancement in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[8]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Current oncologic concepts and emerging techniques for imaging of head and neck squamous cell cancer , 2012, GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery.

[9]  W. Kalender,et al.  Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. , 2010, Radiology.

[10]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  Metal Artifact Reduction by Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Using Energetic Extrapolation: A Systematically Optimized Protocol , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[11]  C. Czerny,et al.  Can dual-energy CT improve the assessment of tumor margins in oral cancer? , 2014, Oral oncology.

[12]  T. Vogl,et al.  Dual-source 128-slice MDCT neck: radiation dose and image quality estimation of three different protocols. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[13]  Martin Sedlmair,et al.  Assessment of an Advanced Image-Based Technique to Calculate Virtual Monoenergetic Computed Tomographic Images From a Dual-Energy Examination to Improve Contrast-To-Noise Ratio in Examinations Using Iodinated Contrast Media , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[14]  R. Sader,et al.  Dual-energy CT applications in head and neck imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Normalized Metal Artifact Reduction in Head and Neck Computed Tomography , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Robert Hermans,et al.  Staging of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: value of imaging studies , 2006, European Radiology.

[17]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Monoenergetic computed tomography reconstructions reduce beam hardening artifacts from dental restorations , 2013, Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology.

[18]  H. Maier,et al.  Radiological detection of extracapsular spread in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cervical metastases. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[19]  S. Schoenberg,et al.  Value of monoenergetic low-kV dual energy CT datasets for improved image quality of CT pulmonary angiography. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[20]  Thomas J. Vogl,et al.  Comparison of dual-energy CT-derived iodine content and iodine overlay of normal, inflammatory and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma cervical lymph nodes , 2013, European Radiology.

[21]  Yoshiyuki Noto,et al.  Reduction of dark-band-like metal artifacts caused by dental implant bodies using hypothetical monoenergetic imaging after dual-energy computed tomography. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[22]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Spectral optimization of chest CT angiography with reduced iodine load: experience in 80 patients evaluated with dual-source, dual-energy CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[23]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Ultralow-Dose Chest Computed Tomography for Pulmonary Nodule Detection: First Performance Evaluation of Single Energy Scanning With Spectral Shaping , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[24]  Julian L Wichmann,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Late Iodine–Enhancement Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for the Detection of Chronic Myocardial Infarction Compared With Late Gadolinium–Enhancement 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[25]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Image Fusion in Dual Energy Computed Tomography: Effect on Contrast Enhancement, Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Image Quality in Computed Tomography Angiography , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[26]  Ralf W. Bauer,et al.  Dual-Energy CT of Head and Neck Cancer: Average Weighting of Low- and High-Voltage Acquisitions to Improve Lesion Delineation and Image Quality—Initial Clinical Experience , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[27]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Dual-energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.