Experiential Limitation in Judgment and Decision
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ulrike Hahn,et al. Why Three Heads Are a Better Bet than Four: A Reply to Sun, Tweney, and Wang (2010). , 2010 .
[2] Peter Ayton,et al. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[3] K. Fiedler,et al. Does decision quality (always) increase with the size of information samples? Some vicissitudes in applying the law of large numbers. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[4] A. Tversky,et al. Information versus reward in binary choices. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.
[5] J. March,et al. Adaptation as Information Restriction: The Hot Stove Effect , 2001 .
[6] Y. Kareev. Through a narrow window: working memory capacity and the detection of covariation , 1995, Cognition.
[7] Ryan K. Jessup,et al. Feedback Produces Divergence From Prospect Theory in Descriptive Choice , 2008, Psychological science.
[8] A. Tversky,et al. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.
[9] Timothy J. Pleskac,et al. Decisions From Experience and Statistical Probabilities: Why They Trigger Different Choices Than a Priori Probabilities , 2010 .
[10] Craig R. Fox,et al. Information asymmetry in decision from description versus decision from experience , 2009, Judgment and Decision Making.
[11] J. Elman. Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small , 1993, Cognition.
[12] W. Wagenaar,et al. The perception of randomness , 1991 .
[13] Lars-Göran Nilsson,et al. Adult age differences in the realism of confidence judgments: overconfidence, format dependence, and cognitive predictors. , 2008, Psychology and aging.
[14] R. Nickerson,et al. The production and perception of randomness. , 2002, Psychological review.
[15] Timothy J. Pleskac,et al. The game of life , 2008 .
[16] Anders Winman,et al. The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[17] Klaus Fiedler,et al. The ultimate sampling dilemma in experience-based decision making. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[18] Susan F Butler,et al. On producing random binary sequences. , 2009, The American journal of psychology.
[19] J. L. Cowan,et al. The Gambler's Fallacy , 1969 .
[20] Klaus Fiedler,et al. Taking the interface between mind and environment seriously , 2006 .
[21] Richard Gonzalez,et al. On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.
[22] P. Juslin,et al. Naive empiricism and dogmatism in confidence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy effect. , 2000, Psychological review.
[23] R. Hertwig,et al. Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.
[24] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .
[25] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence. , 1991, Psychological review.
[26] Yaakov Kareev,et al. Not that bad after all : generation of random sequences , 1992 .
[27] A. Tversky,et al. Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .
[28] Marcus Lindskog,et al. Naïve point estimation. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[29] M. Landy,et al. Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] Michael E Doherty,et al. Sample size and the detection of correlation--a signal detection account: comment on Kareev (2000) and Juslin and Olsson (2005). , 2005, Psychological review.
[31] Y. Kareev,et al. On the misperception of variability. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[32] Klaus Fiedler,et al. Less Is More in Covariation Detection – Or Is It? , 2005 .
[33] L. Green,et al. Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[34] N. Cowan. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[35] S. Cahan,et al. The effect of working memory capacity limitations on the intuitive assessment of correlation: amplification, attenuation, or both? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[36] Y. Kareev. Seven (indeed, plus or minus two) and the detection of correlations. , 2000, Psychological review.
[37] B. Newell,et al. The Role of Working Memory in Information Acquisition and Decision Making: Lessons from the Binary Prediction Task , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[38] A. Tversky,et al. BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.
[39] Ulrike Hahn,et al. Unrealistic optimism about future life events: a cautionary note. , 2011, Psychological review.
[40] Gordon D. A. Brown,et al. Decision by sampling , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[41] U. Hahn,et al. Perceptuo-motor, cognitive, and description-based decision-making seem equally good , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] Ben R. Newell,et al. Degrees of uncertainty: An overview and framework for future research on experience‐based choice , 2010 .
[43] Adrian R. Camilleri,et al. Description- and experience-based choice: does equivalent information equal equivalent choice? , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[44] G. A. Miller. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .
[45] N. Chater,et al. Are Probabilities Overweighted or Underweighted When Rare Outcomes Are Experienced (Rarely)? , 2009, Psychological science.
[46] K. Fiedler,et al. Clarifying the advantage of small samples: as it relates to statistical Wisdom and Cahan's (2010) normative intuitions. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[47] L. Hasher,et al. Automatic and effortful processes in memory. , 1979 .
[48] J. March. Learning to be risk averse. , 1996 .
[49] Timothy J. Pleskac,et al. Decisions from experience: Why small samples? , 2010, Cognition.
[50] L Hasher,et al. Automatic processing of fundamental information: the case of frequency of occurrence. , 1984, The American psychologist.
[51] Y. Kareev. And Yet the Small-Sample Effect Does Hold: Reply to Juslin and Olsson (2005) and Anderson, Doherty, Berg, and Friedrich (2005). , 2005 .
[52] P. Juslin,et al. Contingency Learning and Biased Group Impressions , 2005 .
[53] I. Erev,et al. On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. , 2005, Psychological review.
[54] W. Edwards,et al. Probability learning in 1000 trials. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.
[55] Angela J. Yu,et al. Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[56] Alvin E. Roth,et al. A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description , 2010 .
[57] K. Fiedler. Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. , 2000, Psychological review.
[58] W. Gaissmaier,et al. Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: when are they successful? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[59] Craig R. Fox,et al. “Decisions from experience” = sampling error + prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004) , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.
[60] Anders Winman,et al. The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals. , 2007, Psychological review.
[61] An T. Oskarsson,et al. What’s Next? Judging Sequences of Binary Events , 2008, Psychological bulletin.
[62] I. Erev,et al. Simultaneous Over- and Underconfidence: The Role of Error in Judgment Processes. , 1994 .
[63] Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al. Randomness in retrospect: Exploring the interactions between memory and randomness cognition , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[64] Jerker Denrell. Adaptive learning and risk taking. , 2007, Psychological review.
[65] Timothy J. Pleskac,et al. The game of life : how small samples render choice simpler , 2008 .
[66] Lynn Hasher,et al. Frequency processing: A twenty-five year perspective. , 2002 .
[67] R. Hertwig,et al. The description–experience gap in risky choice , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[68] Elissa L. Newport,et al. Maturational Constraints on Language Learning , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[69] Adrian R. Camilleri,et al. When and why rare events are underweighted: A direct comparison of the sampling, partial feedback, full feedback and description choice paradigms , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[70] Ulrike Hahn,et al. Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four. , 2009, Psychological review.
[71] K. Kirby,et al. Bidding on the Future: Evidence Against Normative Discounting of Delayed Rewards , 1997 .
[72] I. Erev,et al. Small feedback‐based decisions and their limited correspondence to description‐based decisions , 2003 .
[73] Judge for yourself: reply to Evans and Buehner (2011). , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[74] R. Hertwig. Decisions from Experience , 2015 .
[75] Lola L. Lopes. Doing the impossible: A note on induction and the experience of randomness. , 1982 .
[76] P. Ayton,et al. Psychological conceptions of randomness , 1989 .
[77] M. Buehner,et al. Small samples do not cause greater accuracy--but clear data may cause small samples: comment on Fiedler and Kareev (2006). , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[78] John R. Anderson. The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .
[79] B. Newell,et al. Biased samples not mode of presentation: Re-examining the apparent underweighting of rare events in experience-based choice , 2008 .
[80] Henrik Olsson,et al. Capacity limitations and the detection of correlations: comment on Kareev (2000). , 2005, Psychological review.
[81] Y. Kareev,et al. Through a narrow window: Sample size and the perception of correlation , 1997 .
[82] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action. , 2009, Psychological review.
[83] B. Fischhoff,et al. Calibration of probabilities: the state of the art to 1980 , 1982 .
[84] A. Tversky,et al. Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .
[85] E. Newport. Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: Studies of the acquisition of American sign language , 1988 .