Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] James J. Jenkins,et al. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels , 1983 .
[2] J A Bashford,et al. Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong “bottom-up” cues for phonemic restoration , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[3] Jae Hee Lee,et al. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[5] Daniel Fogerty,et al. The role of vowel and consonant fundamental frequency, envelope, and temporal fine structure cues to the intelligibility of words and sentences. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Christian Lorenzi,et al. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Daniel Fogerty,et al. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] Daniel Fogerty,et al. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] Daniel Fogerty,et al. Perceptual contributions of the consonant-vowel boundary to sentence intelligibility. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] Christian E Stilp,et al. The redundancy of phonemes in sentential context. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[14] D J Van Tasell,et al. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] L. Humes,et al. Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] Robert F. Port,et al. Meter and speech , 2003, J. Phonetics.
[18] Steven Greenberg,et al. Speech intelligibility derived from exceedingly sparse spectral information , 1998, ICSLP.
[19] R L Freyman,et al. Effect of consonant-vowel ratio modification on amplitude envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[20] Bryan E Pfingst,et al. Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] Fei Chen,et al. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Su-Hyun Jin,et al. Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Christian E Stilp,et al. Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[24] A. Liberman,et al. Some Experiments on the Perception of Synthetic Speech Sounds , 1952 .
[25] Daniel Fogerty. Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[26] Jont B. Allen,et al. The influence of stop consonants' perceptual features on the Articulation Index model. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] Kenneth N Stevens,et al. Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] J A Bashford,et al. Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations. , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[29] W. Strange,et al. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Fei Chen,et al. Contributions of cochlea-scaled entropy and consonant-vowel boundaries to prediction of speech intelligibility in noise. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[31] Michael J Owren,et al. The relative roles of vowels and consonants in discriminating talker identity versus word meaning. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restoration. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.