Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.

PURPOSE To test the hypothesis that rapid and accurate performance of the proficient observer in mammogram interpretation involves a shift in the mechanism of image perception from a relatively slow search-to-find mode to a relatively fast holistic mode. MATERIALS AND METHODS This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and participant informed consent was obtained; patient informed consent was not required. The eye positions of three full-time mammographers, one attending radiologist, two mammography fellows, and three radiology residents were recorded during the interpretation of 20 normal and 20 subtly abnormal mammograms. The search time required to first locate a cancer, as well as the initial eye scan path, was determined and compared with diagnostic performance as measured with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS The median time for all observers to fixate a cancer, regardless of the decision outcome, was 1.13 seconds, with a range of 0.68 second to 3.06 seconds. Even though most of the lesions were fixated, recognition of them as cancerous ranged from 85% (17 of 20) to 10% (two of 20), with corresponding areas under the ROC curve of 0.87-0.40. The ROC index of detectability, d(a), was linearly related to the time to first fixate a cancer with a correlation (r(2)) of 0.81. CONCLUSION The rapid initial fixation of a true abnormality is evidence for a global perceptual process capable of analyzing the visual input of the entire retinal image and pinpointing the spatial location of an abnormality. It appears to be more highly developed in the most proficient observers, replacing the less efficient initial search-to-find strategies.

[1]  H L Kundel,et al.  Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search. , 1975, Radiology.

[2]  Richard G. Swensson,et al.  A two-stage detection model applied to skilled visual search by radiologists , 1980 .

[3]  R. C. Murry,et al.  The effect of search time on perception. , 1981, Radiology.

[4]  H L Kundel,et al.  Searching for lung nodules. A comparison of human performance with random and systematic scanning models. , 1987, Investigative radiology.

[5]  M. Myles-Worsley,et al.  The influence of expertise on X-ray image processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  J W Oestmann,et al.  Lung lesions: correlation between viewing time and detection. , 1988, Radiology.

[7]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[8]  H L Kundel,et al.  Searching for lung nodules. The guidance of visual scanning. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[9]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Recording and analyzing eye-position data using a microcomputer workstation , 1992 .

[10]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  J. Schall Neural Basis of Saccade Target Selection , 1995, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[12]  Neil Charness,et al.  The role of practice and coaching in entrepreneurial skill domains: An international comparison of life-span chess skill acquisition. , 1996 .

[13]  H L Kundel,et al.  Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses , 1996, Medical Imaging.

[14]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[15]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Learning to recognize objects , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  B P Wood,et al.  Visual expertise. , 1999, Radiology.

[17]  H L Kundel,et al.  A perceptually tempered display for digital mammograms. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvements in adults' visual sensitivity? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvements in adults' visual sensitivity? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Claudia Mello-Thoms,et al.  Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Helen C. Cowley,et al.  Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[22]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Diagnostic use of scale information for componential and holistic recognition. , 2003 .

[23]  Chicago 2004 , 2004, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[24]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Watching Single Cells Pay Attention , 2005, Science.

[25]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 , 2005, Science.