Information sharing and trust during major incidents: Findings from the oil industry

Communication and information sharing during the response to a major incident on oil rigs have been identified as significantly influencing capability to control, manage, and limit the effect of the incident. This article reports on one of the few studies of information sharing during such incidents. Interviews drawing on the critical incident technique were conducted with offshore emergency responders and supplemented by internal organizational reports and observations of emergency response exercises. We propose a counterintuitive relationship between trust and information sharing. We argue that better information sharing plays a crucial role in instilling or enhancing trust and that in the time-bound, uncertain, and highly volatile context of offshore emergency response, if trust collapses, then it must be rebuilt swiftly and this can be done through more effective information sharing. We explore this argument using the activity theory concept of contradictions and argue that apparent contradictions in the activity system and the behavior of emergency responders should be analyzed and interpreted by taking into account crucial contextual characteristics. The article draws on further support from relevant literature, including that of the information science, organization, and communication fields. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Harry Daniels,et al.  Learning and expanding with activity theory , 2009 .

[2]  Todd A. Mooradian,et al.  Who Trusts? Personality, Trust and Knowledge Sharing , 2006 .

[3]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Dynamics of communication in emergency management , 2002 .

[4]  Reijo Miettinen Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: Contradictions of High-Technology Capitalism and the Emergence of New Forms of Work , 2009 .

[5]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[6]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Sharing 'worlds of risk'; improving communication with crew resource management , 2001 .

[7]  Gülay Barbarosoglu,et al.  An interactive approach for hierarchical analysis of helicopter logistics in disaster relief operations , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Sung-Un Yang,et al.  Communication management and trust: Their role in building resilience to "surprises" such as natural disasters, pandemic flu, and terrorism , 2008 .

[11]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. , 2000, Ergonomics.

[12]  J. Lamprecht,et al.  E and P companies, suppliers move to international standards , 1991 .

[13]  Robert C. Ginnett,et al.  CREWS AS GROUPS: THEIR FORMATION AND THEIR LEADERSHIP. , 1993 .

[14]  Fuelling Conflict The Oil Industry and Armed Conflict , 2002 .

[15]  B. Jennings Qualitative analysis: a case of software or 'peopleware?'. , 2007, Research in nursing & health.

[16]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Information sharing: an exploration of the literature and some propositions , 2010, Inf. Res..

[17]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Organizational knowledge and communities of practice , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[19]  Larry Reynolds The Trust Effect: Creating the High Trust, High Performance Organization , 1999 .

[20]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  A re-examination of information seeking behaviour in the context of activity theory , 2006, Inf. Res..

[21]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[22]  Leon Mann,et al.  Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance , 2010 .

[23]  L.W.D. Cullen,et al.  The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster , 1993 .

[24]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm , 2004 .

[25]  Kristina Lauche,et al.  Incident Command Skills in the Management of an Oil Industry Drilling Incident: A Case Study , 2005 .

[26]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications , 1995, EWHCI.

[27]  D. Paton,et al.  Developing disaster management capability: an assessment centre approach , 2002 .

[28]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Information behaviour: an interdisciplinary perspective , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[29]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Emergency Decision Making in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[31]  C. Owen Beyond teamwork! Reconceptualising communication, coordination and collaboration in air traffic control , 2004 .

[32]  G. Kovács,et al.  The application of "swift trust" to humanitarian logistics , 2010 .

[33]  Stacey M. Conchie,et al.  The Role of Distrust in Offshore Safety Performance , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  Barbara G. Kanki,et al.  Cockpit Resource Management , 1993 .

[35]  CHRISTINE A. HALVERSON,et al.  Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories? , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[36]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[37]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[38]  K. Weick The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[39]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Identifying the Right Stuff: Selecting and Training On‐Scene Emergency Commanders , 1995 .

[40]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[41]  A. Hemetsberger,et al.  Collective Development in Open-Source Communities: An Activity Theoretical Perspective on Successful Online Collaboration , 2009 .

[42]  Mark Kaszniak,et al.  CSB investigation of the explosions and fire at the BP texas city refinery on March 23, 2005 , 2006 .

[43]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Modeling of BP Texas City refinery incident , 2007 .

[44]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  A Decentralized Trust Model to Reduce Information Unreliability in Complex Disaster Relief Operations , 2006, EG-ICE.

[45]  V. Kaptelinin Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[46]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  E. Lerner,et al.  The Golden Hour : Scientific Fact or Medical ‘ ‘ Urban Legend ’ ’ ? , 2001 .

[48]  Stephen Marsh,et al.  The role of trust in information science and technology , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[49]  A. Light,et al.  Critical incident technique and explicitation interviewing in studies of information behavior , 2003 .

[50]  Rhona Flin,et al.  Personality and emergency command ability , 1996 .

[51]  K. Weick Drop Your Tools: An Allegory for Organizational Studies. , 1996 .

[52]  Max Stephenson,et al.  Making humanitarian relief networks more effective: operational coordination, trust and sense making. , 2005, Disasters.

[53]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. , 1993 .

[54]  Jonas Landgren,et al.  A study of emergency response work: patterns of mobile phone interaction , 2007, CHI.

[55]  Colin Summerhayes,et al.  Deep Water – The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future of Offshore Drilling , 2011 .

[56]  P. Bonacich Communication networks and collective action , 1987 .

[57]  A. J. Grimes Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies , 1985 .

[58]  S. Robbins Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies, Applications , 1979 .

[59]  David Allen,et al.  Information behavior and decision making in time-constrained practice: A dual-processing perspective , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[60]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[61]  Tom Wilson,et al.  Information behaviour: an inter-disciplinary perspective , 1997 .

[62]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Information use environments. , 1991 .

[63]  K. Dirks The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  Charles Vaught,et al.  A Study of First Moments in Underground Mine Emergency Response , 2010 .

[65]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments , 2003 .

[66]  B. Nardi Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition , 1995 .

[67]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Asch’s Moral Epistemology for Socially Shared Knowledge , 2014 .

[68]  N. Denzin,et al.  Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials , 2012 .

[69]  Rjoè,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work , 2005 .

[70]  Bente E. Moen,et al.  What is most important for safety climate: The company belonging or the local working environment? – A study from the Norwegian offshore industry , 2009 .

[71]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[72]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[73]  A. Toomela Activity Theory Is a Dead End for Cultural-Historical Psychology , 2000 .

[74]  Nico Martins,et al.  A model for managing trust. , 2002 .

[75]  K. James The organizational science of disaster/terrorism prevention and response: Theory‐building toward the future of the field , 2011 .

[76]  David K. Allen,et al.  Sociospatial context and information behavior: Social exclusion and the influence of mobile information technology , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[77]  M. Reed,et al.  Organizations and Rationality: the Odd Couple? , 1991 .

[78]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Challenges in sharing information effectively: examples from command and control , 2006, Inf. Res..

[79]  J. Schraagen,et al.  Information Sharing During Crisis Management in Hierarchical vs. Network Teams , 2010 .