Exorcising the Ghost of Physical Determinism

The objective of this article is to clarify the major weaknesses of the physical determinist perspective, to understand how the term "determinism" has been used in the field of environment-behavior research and to allay some of the fears that the idea of determinism seems to arouse in researchers. Four major weaknesses of the determinist perspective are discussed: (1) exaggerating the influence of the physical environment by ignoring or underestimating the influence of other factors; (2) assuming that the physical environment has only direct effects on behavior; (3) portraying people as passive in the environmentbehavior relationship by ignoring the role of human choice and goals; and (4) always assuming that the environment is a given and immutable entity and neglecting the processes of creating and modifying environments. Diagrams are used to illustrate different types of environment-behavior relationships and to distinguish between indirect and interaction effects of environment on behavior.

[1]  S. Z. Klausner,et al.  On Man in His Environment. , 1976 .

[2]  E. Tolman.  The determiners of behavior at a choice point. , 1938 .

[3]  William R. Catton,et al.  What Environmental Sociologists Have in Common (whether Concerned with “Built” or “Natural” Environments)* , 1983 .

[4]  R. Gutman,et al.  People and Buildings , 1974 .

[5]  G. Lewthwaite.  ENVIRONMENTALISM AND DETERMINISM: A SEARCH FOR CLARIFICATION , 1966 .

[6]  A. Rapoport.  The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach , 1982 .

[7]  Galen Cranz,et al.  The Politics of Park Design: A History of Urban Parks in America. , 1984 .

[8]  Karen A. Franck,et al.  Community by Design , 1983 .

[9]  John Zeisel,et al.  Sociology and architectural design , 1975 .

[10]  Craig Zimring,et al.  Environmental Design Evaluation , 1978 .

[11]  Gwendolyn Wright.  Building the dream : a social history of housing in America , 1982 .

[12]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser,et al.  Environmental Design Research , 2018 .

[13]  Albert D Hunter,et al.  The Loss of Community: An Empirical Test Through Replication , 1975 .

[14]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  The Logic of Survey Analysis. , 1968 .

[15]  A. Patterson,et al.  Methodological Developments in Environment-Behavioral Research , 1977 .

[16]  Timothy O'Riordan,et al.  Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning , 1979 .

[17]  C. L. Hull.  The problem of intervening variables in molar behavior theory. , 1943 .

[18]  W. H. Ittelson,et al.  An Introduction to environmental psychology , 1977 .

[19]  D. Gans.  People and plans , 1968 .

[20]  Karen A. Franck,et al.  The effects of building size on personal crime and fear of crime , 1982 .

[21]  A. Rapoport.  House form and culture , 1970 .

[22]  W. Michelson.  Man and his urban environment: A sociological approach, with revisions , 1976 .

[23]  Jennifer Tann,et al.  Buildings and Society: Essays on the Social Development of the Built Environment. , 1981 .

[24]  N. J. Habraken,et al.  Supports, an alternative to mass housing , 1972 .

[25]  W. Gove,et al.  Overcrowding in the home: an empirical investigation of its possible pathological consequences. , 1979, American sociological review.

[26]  T. W. Freeman,et al.  Environmental Choice, Human Behavior, and Residential Satisfaction , 1978 .

[27]  N. L. Mintz,et al.  Effects of Esthetic Surroundings: II. Prolonged and Repeated Experience in a “Beautiful” and an “Ugly” Room , 1956 .

[28]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by Design: Tools for Environment-Behavior Research , 1981 .

[29]  Rudolf H. Moos,et al.  The human context: Environmental determinants of behavior , 1976 .

[30]  L. Festinger,et al.  Social pressures in informal groups , 1950 .

[31]  Research on Environment and Behavior: A Personal Statement of Strategy , 1977 .