Measurements and modelling of free-surface turbulent flows induced by a magnetic stirrer in an unbaffled stirred tank reactor

Abstract Measurements and numerical simulations of turbulent flows with free-surface vortex in an unbaffled reactor agitated by a cylindrical magnetic stirrer are presented. Measurements of the three mean and fluctuating components of the velocity vector are made using a laser Doppler velocimetry in order to characterise the flow field at different speeds of the stirrer. A homogeneous Eulerian–Eulerian multiphase flow model coupled with a volume-of-fluid method for interface capturing is applied to determine the vortex shape and to compute the turbulent flow field in the reactor. Turbulence is modelled using a second-moment differential Reynolds-stress transport (RST) model, but for some cases the k – e / k – ω based shear-stress transport (SST) model is also used. The predictions obtained using the ANSYS CFX-5.7 computational fluid dynamics code are compared with the images of the vortex and the measured distributions of mean axial, radial and tangential velocities and turbulent kinetic energy. The predicted general shape of the liquid free-surface is in good agreement with measurements, but the vortex depth is underpredicted. The overall agreement between the measured and the predicted axial and tangential velocities obtained with the RST model is good. However, the radial velocity is significantly underpredicted. Predictions of the turbulent kinetic energy yield reasonably good agreement with measurements in the bulk flow region, but discrepancy exists near the reactor wall where this quantity is underpredicted. The SST model predictions are generally of the same quality as those of the RST model, with the latter model providing better predictions of the tangential velocity distribution.

[1]  K. C. Lee,et al.  Numerical simulations of the dependency of flow pattern on impeller clearance in stirred vessels , 2001 .

[2]  Alberto Brucato,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in an unbaffled stirred tank driven by a Rushton turbine , 2005 .

[3]  Gerry E. Schneider,et al.  A SKEWED, POSITIVE INFLUENCE COEFFICIENT UPWINDING PROCEDURE FOR CONTROL-VOLUME-BASED FINITE-ELEMENT CONVECTION-DIFFUSION COMPUTATION , 1986 .

[4]  John J. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Modelling vortex formation in an unbaffled stirred tank reactors , 2007 .

[5]  K. Van't Riet,et al.  The trailing vortex system produced by Rushton turbine agitators , 1975 .

[6]  Kevin J. Roberts,et al.  LDA measurements and CFD modeling of a stirred vessel with a retreat curve impeller , 2004 .

[7]  Alberto Brucato,et al.  Turbulent flow in closed and free-surface unbaffled tanks stirred by radial impellers , 1996 .

[8]  Costas Kiparissides,et al.  CFD analysis of turbulence non-homogeneity in mixing vessels: A two-compartment model , 2002 .

[9]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  A stable and accurate convective modelling procedure based on quadratic upstream interpolation , 1990 .

[10]  Catherine Xuereb,et al.  An experimental and computational study of the vortex shape in a partially baffled agitated vessel , 2007 .

[11]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[12]  Alvin W. Nienow,et al.  Macro- and micromixing studies in an unbaffled vessel agitated by a Rushton turbine , 2008 .

[13]  Alfredo Soldati,et al.  Time-dependent finite-volume simulation of the turbulent flow in a free-surface CSTR , 2001 .

[14]  M. Raw,et al.  Robustness of coupled Algebraic Multigrid for the Navier-Stokes equations , 1996 .

[15]  Zdzisław Jaworski,et al.  Modelling of the Turbulent Wall Jet Generated by a Pitched Blade Turbine Impeller: The Effect of Turbulence Model , 2002 .

[16]  Sreenivas Jayanti,et al.  CFD Study of Power and Mixing Time for Paddle Mixing in Unbaffled Vessels , 2002 .

[17]  Alberto Brucato,et al.  Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: A comparison of alternative modelling approaches , 1998 .

[18]  H. V. D. Akker.  The Details of Turbulent Mixing Process and their Simulation , 2006 .

[19]  P. Mavros,et al.  FLOW VISUALIZATION IN STIRRED VESSELS A Review of Experimental Techniques , 2001 .

[20]  Michael Yianneskis,et al.  Assessment of Sliding Mesh CFD Predictions and LDA Measurements of the Flow in a Tank Stirred by a Rushton Impeller , 1998 .

[21]  Kemal Hanjalic,et al.  Advanced turbulence closure models: a view of current status and future prospects , 1994 .

[22]  G. Montante,et al.  Effect of the shaft eccentricity on the hydrodynamics of unbaffled stirred tanks , 2006 .

[23]  Kevin J. Roberts,et al.  Modeling Turbulent Flows with Free-Surface in Unbaffled Agitated Vessels , 2006 .

[24]  T. Gatski,et al.  Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  T. A. Engh,et al.  Flow induced by an impeller in an unbaffled tank—II. Numerical modelling , 1994 .

[26]  A. Inoue,et al.  TURBULENCE IN NON-BAFFLED MIXING VESSEL , 1975 .

[27]  Timothy J. Barth,et al.  The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes , 1989 .

[28]  A. Melling,et al.  Principles and practice of laser-Doppler anemometry , 1976 .

[29]  D. Fletcher,et al.  Single and multiphase CFD approaches for modelling partially baffled stirred vessels: comparison of experimental data with numerical predictions , 2007 .

[30]  Ivan Fort,et al.  Velocity profiles in a closed, unbaffled vessel: comparison between experimental LDV data and numerical CFD predictions , 1997 .

[31]  S. T. Johansen,et al.  Flow induced by an impeller in an unbaffled tank—I. Experimental , 1994 .