The Discriminant Value of Personality, Motivation, and Online Relationship Quality in Predicting Attraction to Online Social Support on Facebook

This study investigates the relationship between personality traits, user motivations, relationship quality, and attraction to online social support in a sample of young adults (N = 278) in Greece who use Facebook. Self-report questionnaires on personality, motives, relationship quality, online social support, and sociodemographic factors were administered. According to the results, men in contrast to women were significantly more attracted to online social support. Predictors of online relationship quality were the existence of close relationships, entertainment, and conscientiousness. Motives, personality, relationship quality, and gender were good predictors of attraction to online social support. Implications for psychologists and future research are discussed.

[1]  Agata Blachnio,et al.  Psychological Determinants of Using Facebook: A Research Review , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  J. L. Bender,et al.  Seeking Support on Facebook: A Content Analysis of Breast Cancer Groups , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  John Raacke,et al.  MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  Tracii Ryan,et al.  Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  G. Miller,et al.  Handbook of Interpersonal Communication , 1985 .

[6]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Strength of Internet Ties, The , 2006 .

[7]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Personality and self reported mobile phone use , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[9]  Geert Hofstede,et al.  National cultures revisited , 1983 .

[10]  Jennifer Tichon,et al.  The Process of Sharing Social Support in Cyberspace , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  Scott E. Caplan.  A Theory of Problematic Internet Use and Psychosocial Well-Being , 2003 .

[12]  P. Costa,et al.  Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[13]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Social network use and personality , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Erina L. MacGeorge.  Gender Differences in Attributions and Emotions in Helping Contexts , 2003 .

[16]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Konstantinos Kafetsios,et al.  Emotion and support perceptions in everyday social interaction: Testing the “less is more” hypothesis in two cultures , 2012 .

[18]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Me and my 400 friends: the anatomy of college students' Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[19]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  The Facebook Paths to Happiness: Effects of the Number of Facebook Friends and Self-Presentation on Subjective Well-Being , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  Yan Bing Zhang,et al.  Social Interactions Across Media , 2004 .

[21]  Yard. Doç. Dr. Yeşim Ulusu.  DETERMINANT FACTORS OF TIME SPENT ON FACEBOOK: BRAND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND USAGE TYPES , 2010 .

[22]  Laura Price,et al.  Motivations for Social Internet Use , 2005 .

[23]  Erin Ryan Harbaugh.  The Effect of Personality Styles (Level of Introversion- Extroversion) on Social Media Use , 2010 .

[24]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Culture and Social Support: Who Seeks It and Why? , 2004 .

[25]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[27]  Marika Lüders,et al.  Too Many Facebook “Friends”? Content Sharing and Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  The impact of the Internet on the social lives of users: A representative sample from 13 countries , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Using facebook after losing a job: differential benefits of strong and weak ties , 2013, CSCW.

[30]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  The Influence of Cultural Differences on the Use of Social Network Services and the Formation of Social Capital , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Facebook Therapy? Why Do People Share Self-Relevant Content Online? , 2012 .

[32]  The five-factor model: issues and applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[33]  J. House,et al.  Social relationships and health. , 1988, Science.

[34]  Lindsay T. Graham,et al.  A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[35]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Internet and personality , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Psychological Predictors of Young Adults' Use of Social Networking Sites , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[37]  Soo Jeong Youn,et al.  Using online social media, Facebook, in screening for major depressive disorder among college students , 2013 .

[38]  Garyfalia Ampanozi,et al.  Suicide announcement on Facebook. , 2011, Crisis.

[39]  M. White,et al.  Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. , 2000, Computers in nursing.

[40]  Pushmeet Kohli,et al.  Personality and patterns of Facebook usage , 2012, WebSci '12.

[41]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Weak-Tie Support Network Preference and Perceived Life Stress Among Participants in Health-Related, Computer-Mediated Support Groups , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[43]  F. Griffiths,et al.  Social networks--the future for health care delivery. , 2012, Social science & medicine.

[44]  White Mh,et al.  Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. , 2000 .

[45]  G. Kleftaras.  Psychosocial Factors and Later Life Depressive Symptoms in a Greek Community Sample , 2006 .

[46]  Y. Kashima,et al.  From social talk to social action: shaping the social triad with emotion sharing. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  Andrew M. Ledbetter,et al.  Relational quality and media use in interpersonal relationships , 2007, New Media Soc..

[48]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[49]  A. S. Nurullah.  Received and Provided Social Support: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions , 2012 .

[50]  Asimina Vasalou,et al.  Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of "true commitment" in Facebook , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[51]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Facebook Friends with (Health) Benefits? Exploring Social Network Site Use and Perceptions of Social Support, Stress, and Well-Being , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[52]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[53]  Benjamin H. Gottlieb,et al.  Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists. , 2000 .

[54]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  Social Networking Profiles: An Examination of Student Attitudes Regarding Use and Appropriateness of Content , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[55]  P. Costa,et al.  NEO inventories for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) : professional manual , 2010 .

[56]  Lin Qiu,et al.  Cultural Differences and Switching of In-Group Sharing Behavior Between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) Social Networking Site , 2013 .

[57]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Brothers' Keepers: Situating Kinship Relations in Broader Networks of Social Support , 1989 .

[58]  Tel Amiel,et al.  Individual differences in Internet usage motives , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[60]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Alt.support: modeling social support online , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[61]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[62]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[63]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Changes in use and perception of facebook , 2008, CSCW.

[64]  Rosanna E. Guadagno,et al.  Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[65]  David Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Facebook Effect: The Inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World , 2010 .

[66]  James B. Hittner,et al.  Relationships among Internet use, personality, and social support , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[67]  Y. Poortinga,et al.  The Relationship of Family Bonds to Family Structure and Function Across Cultures , 1997 .

[68]  Elizabeth D. Cox,et al.  Feeling bad on Facebook: depression disclosures by college students on a social networking site , 2011, Depression and anxiety.

[69]  John Suler,et al.  Psychological Aspects of Cyberspace: Reflections on the Psychology and Social Science of Cyberspace , 2008 .

[70]  Kyriaki G. Giota,et al.  The role of personality and depression in problematic use of social networking sites in Greece , 2013 .

[71]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  Online social networks: why we disclose , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..