Looking inside the bag of tools: creating research encounters with parents with an intellectual disability

This paper examines the development of fieldwork methodology in a study that investigated the parenting experiences and parent support needs of a group of parents with an intellectual disability. It considers the ways in which the original planning for the project changed as the fieldwork unfolded, requiring adaptations to our methodological expectations and in the process deepening our understanding of the phenomena we were studying and reinforcing for us the importance of relationships in fieldwork‐based research. Three themes in particular are considered that became central to this research: research relationships; safety for participants/positioning of the researcher; suspending assumptions about impairment and disability and influences on life experiences.

[1]  Berth Danermark,et al.  Metatheory, Interdisciplinarity and Disability Research: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2006 .

[2]  D. Goodley,et al.  Doing Disability Research: Activist lives and the academy , 2000 .

[3]  Tony Gilbert,et al.  Involving people with learning disabilities in research: issues and possibilities. , 2004, Health & social care in the community.

[4]  Sally French,et al.  Telling stories for a politics of hope , 2006 .

[5]  J. Swain,et al.  Public Research, Private Concerns: Ethical issues in the use of open-ended interviews with people who have learning difficulties , 1998 .

[6]  C. Tregaskis,et al.  Disability Research by Disabled and Non‐Disabled People: Towards a Relational Methodology of Research Production , 2005 .

[7]  Colin Barnes,et al.  What a Difference a Decade Makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research , 2003 .

[8]  T. Booth,et al.  Findings from a Court Study of Care Proceedings Involving Parents with Intellectual Disabilities , 2004 .

[9]  T. Parmenter,et al.  Working with the Experts: Collaborative research with people with an intellectual disability , 2000 .

[10]  Dan Goodley,et al.  'Learning Difficulties', the Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging epistemologies , 2001 .

[11]  G Martin,et al.  'Valuing people'--a new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century: how may it impinge on primary care? , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[12]  T. Wolfer,et al.  Relationship Disruption in Adults with Cognitive Disabilities , 2004 .

[13]  D. Atkinson.  Research as Social Work: Participatory Research in Learning Disability , 2005 .

[14]  T. Shakespeare.  Rules of Engagement: Doing disability research , 1996 .

[15]  Jan Walmsley,et al.  Using Autobiographical Approaches with People with Learning Difficulties , 1999 .

[16]  Getting to the Heart of the Matter: Making Meaning—Three Challenges for Family Researchers , 2000, Qualitative health research.

[17]  John M. Davis.  Disability Studies as Ethnographic Research and Text: Research strategies and roles for promoting social change? , 2000 .

[18]  Colin Barnes,et al.  Qualitative Research: Valuable or Irrelevant? , 1992 .

[19]  Rich Furman,et al.  Establishing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Social Work , 2006 .

[20]  M. McCarthy.  Sexuality and Women with Learning Disabilities , 1999 .

[21]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[22]  Kirsten Stalker.  Some Ethical and Methodological Issues in Research with People with Learning Difficulties , 1998 .