Child privacy in the age of the Web 2.0 and 3.0 : challenges and opportunities for policy

We live in an information society, where the flow of information in the virtual environment is unprecedented. Web 2.0 platforms – and recently Web 3.0 platforms and the Internet of Things (IoT) – represent an important step forward in enhancing the lives of both adults and children everywhere, by combining greater efficiencies with a wide availability of new tools that can boost individual creativity and collective production. This new environment has exposed adults and children to fresh challenges that deserve special attention, especially those surrounding privacy. The main objective of this paper is to address the challenges posed to child privacy online and the impact that these challenges might have on other rights such as freedom of expression, access to information and public participation. To do this, the paper first analyses the current (and foreseen) threats to child privacy online and the various approaches adopted by government and/or the private sector to tackle this issue. The paper also examines whether children’s perspectives and needs are considered in international debates on technology regulation, including in regard to the so-called ‘right to be forgotten’. It then contextualizes the protection of privacy (and data protection) in relation to other fundamental rights in the online environment, arguing that in most cases this interaction is rather positive, with the enforcement of the right to privacy serving to protect other rights. The paper concludes by proposing some policy recommendations on how to better address the protection of children’s online privacy. These objectives are achieved through literature review and analysis of legal instruments.

[1]  V. Steeves It's Not Child's Play: The Online Invasion of Children's Privacy , 2007 .

[2]  Stelvio Cimato,et al.  Biometrics and Privacy , 2008 .

[3]  Giovanni Sartor,et al.  The Italian Google-Case: Privacy, Freedom of Speech and Responsibility of Providers for User-Generated Contents , 2010, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[4]  A. Powell Configuring Consent: Emerging Technologies, Unauthorized Sexual Images and Sexual Assault , 2010 .

[5]  Protection of Minors Online: Available Regulatory Approaches , 2011 .

[6]  Privacy and Children's Data - An Overview of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act , 2013 .

[7]  A. Gelb,et al.  Identification for Development: The Biometrics Revolution , 2013 .

[8]  N. Pecora,et al.  Online Data Privacy as a Children's Media Right: Toward Global Policy Principles , 2014 .

[9]  M. Bourreau,et al.  Technology Neutrality in Internet, Telecoms and Data Protection Regulation , 2014 .

[10]  Pierrine Robin The Participation of Children in Care in the Assessment Process , 2014 .

[11]  Siti Zobidah Omar,et al.  Children internet usage: opportunities for self development , 2014 .

[12]  Balancing a Right to be Forgotten with a Right to Freedom of Expression in the Wake of Google Spain v. AEPD , 2015 .

[13]  K. Montgomery Youth and surveillance in the Facebook era , 2015 .

[14]  The EU, children under 13 years, and parental consent: a human rights analysis of a new, age-based bright-line for the protection of children on the Internet , 2015 .

[15]  Louise Axon,et al.  Privacy-awareness in blockchain-based PKI , 2015 .

[16]  Global Kids Online One in three: internet governance and children’s rights , 2016 .

[17]  S. Livingstone,et al.  Global Kids Online: research synthesis 2015-2016 , 2016 .

[18]  Anna Lodinová Application of biometrics as a means of refugee registration: focusing on UNHCR’s strategy , 2016 .

[19]  Wonsun Shin,et al.  Adolescents' privacy concerns and information disclosure online: The role of parents and the Internet , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Mario Viola de Azevedo Cunha,et al.  Between privacy, freedom of information and freedom of expression: Is there a right to be forgotten in Brazil? , 2016, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[21]  S. Steinberg Sharenting: Children's Privacy in the Age of Social Media , 2016 .

[22]  Milda Macenaite,et al.  From universal towards child-specific protection of the right to privacy online: Dilemmas in the EU General Data Protection Regulation , 2017, New Media Soc..

[23]  Is it a Human Right to be Forgotten? Conceptualizing the World View , 2017 .

[24]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  Characterizing Videos, Audience and Advertising in Youtube Channels for Kids , 2017, SocInfo.

[25]  Gabrielle Berman,et al.  Children and the Data Cycle: Rights and Ethics in a Big Data World , 2017, ArXiv.