Distribution features and intellectual structures of digital humanities: A bibliometric analysis

The purpose of this paper is to conduct a retrospective bibliometric analysis of documents about digital humanities, an emerging but interdisciplinary movement. It examines the distribution of research outputs and languages, identifies the active journals and institutions, dissects the network of categories and cited references, and interprets the hot research topics.,The source data are derived from the Web of Science (WoS) core collection. To reveal the holistic landscape of this field, VOSviewer and CiteSpace as popular visualization tools are employed to process the bibliographic data including author, category, reference, and keyword. Furthermore, the parameter design of the visualization tools follows the general procedures and methods for bibliometric analysis.,There is an obviously rapid growth in digital humanities research. English is still the leading academic language in this field. The most influential authors all come from or have scientific relationships with Europe and North America, and two leading countries of which are the UK and USA. Digital humanities is the result of a dynamic dialogue between humanistic exploration and digital means. This research field is closely associated with history, literary and cultural heritage, and information and library science.,This analysis relies on the metadata information extracted from the WoS database; however, some valuable literatures in the field of digital humanities may not be retrieved from the database owing to the inherent challenge of topic search. This study is also restricted by the scope of publications, the limitation regarding the source of data is that WoS database may have underrepresented publications in this domain.,The output of this paper could be a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners interesting in the knowledge domain of digital humanities. Moreover, the conclusions of this retrospective analysis can be deemed as the comparable foundation for future study.

[1]  Marija Dalbello,et al.  A genealogy of digital humanities , 2011, J. Documentation.

[2]  Weiguang Wang,et al.  Visualization and quantitative study in bibliographic databases: A case in the field of university-industry cooperation , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[3]  Melissa Terras,et al.  Opening Access to collections: the making and using of open digitised cultural content , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[4]  Francisco Baena-Sánchez,et al.  Codificación y representación cartográfica de noticias. Aplicación de las humanidades digitales al estudio del periodismo de la Edad moderna , 2014 .

[5]  Gregory Mone.  What's next for digital humanities? , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[6]  Kees Ribbens,et al.  Digital Historical Research: Context, Concepts and the Need for Reflection , 2013 .

[7]  Trevor M. Harris,et al.  The Spatial Humanities: GIS and the Future of Humanities Scholarship , 2010 .

[8]  David M. Berry,et al.  Understanding digital humanities , 2012 .

[9]  J. Ruan,et al.  A Visualization Review of Cloud Computing Algorithms in the Last Decade , 2016 .

[10]  Johanna Drucker,et al.  Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display , 2011, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[11]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Exploratory Chronotopic Data Analysis , 2016, GIScience.

[12]  Diana Hicks,et al.  The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences , 1999, Scientometrics.

[13]  Sara Tonelli,et al.  ALCIDE: Extracting and visualising content from large document collections to support humanities studies , 2016, Knowl. Based Syst..

[14]  S. Kamarthi,et al.  Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature , 2017, PloS one.

[15]  Xin Man,et al.  State of the art on food waste research: a bibliometrics study from 1997 to 2014 , 2017 .

[16]  Junli Li,et al.  Global ontology research progress: a bibliometric analysis , 2015, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Charles Travis,et al.  Visual Geo-Literary and Historical Analysis, Tweetflickrtubing, and James Joyce's Ulysses (1922) , 2015 .

[18]  S. Travis Waller,et al.  Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis , 2017, Scientometrics.

[19]  Pei-Chun Lee,et al.  Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight , 2010, Scientometrics.

[20]  Linda L. Rath,et al.  Low-barrier-to-entry data tools: creating and sharing humanities data , 2016, Libr. Hi Tech.

[21]  M. Terras,et al.  A Decade in Digital Humanities , 2016 .

[22]  Louise Bouchard,et al.  Research on health inequalities: A bibliometric analysis (1966-2014). , 2015, Social science & medicine.

[23]  Cristina Dai Prá Martens,et al.  Research on entrepreneurial orientation: current status and future agenda , 2016 .

[24]  Jie Zhu,et al.  Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis , 2017, Scientometrics.

[25]  Weidong Liu,et al.  Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[26]  W. McCarty.  Humanities Computing: Essential Problems, Experimental Practice , 2002, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[27]  Noemi Sinkovics,et al.  Enhancing the foundations or theorising through bibliometric mapping , 2016 .

[28]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[29]  Rex H.-G. Chen,et al.  Visualizing the world's scientific publications , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  J. Bragge,et al.  Aesthetics in the age of digital humanities , 2016 .

[31]  Derek Greene,et al.  Discovering structure in social networks of 19th century fiction , 2016, WebSci.

[32]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[33]  W. Kaltenbrunner.  Scholarly Labour and Digital Collaboration in Literary Studies , 2015 .

[34]  Zsófia Ruttkay.  Pervasive computing for sustaining cultural heritage , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS).

[35]  Niels Brügger.  When the present web is later the past: web historiography, digital history and internet studies , 2012 .

[36]  Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books , 2010, Science.

[37]  Concepción S. Wilson,et al.  The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics , 2001, Scientometrics.

[38]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Knowledge Base , 2012 .

[39]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Defining the intellectual structure of information systems and related college of business disciplines: a bibliometric analysis , 2012, Scientometrics.

[40]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.

[41]  Tibor Koltay,et al.  Library and information science and the digital humanities: Perceived and real strengths and weaknesses , 2016, J. Documentation.

[42]  Antonio Pulgarín,et al.  The scientific production of Ibero-American authors on information literacy (1985–2013) , 2015, Scientometrics.

[43]  Desmond Schmidt,et al.  The role of markup in the digital humanities , 2012 .

[44]  William A. Kretzschmar,et al.  Library collaboration with large digital humanities projects , 2010, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[45]  Alex H. Poole,et al.  The conceptual ecology of digital humanities , 2017, J. Documentation.

[46]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer , 2017, Scientometrics.

[47]  Polina Mozhaeva Renha,et al.  Information Environment of Digital Humanities: Analysis of Information Interactions , 2016 .

[48]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  How are they different? A quantitative domain comparison of information visualization and data visualization (2000–2014) , 2016, Scientometrics.

[49]  Raymond Pun,et al.  Conceptualizing the integration of digital humanities in instructional services: Possibilities to enhance digital literacy in the 21st century , 2015, Libr. Hi Tech.

[50]  Li Zhang,et al.  Bibliometrics and Visualization Analysis of Artificial Blood Vessel Research , 2014 .

[51]  John Unsworth,et al.  A Companion to Digital Humanities , 2008 .

[52]  Jatin Nathwani,et al.  Visualization of International Energy Policy Research , 2016 .

[53]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Poemage: Visualizing the Sonic Topology of a Poem , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[54]  Uta Hinrichs,et al.  Speculative Practices: Utilizing InfoVis to Explore Untapped Literary Collections , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[55]  M. Gold.  Debates in the Digital Humanities , 2012 .

[56]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Web site design with the patron in mind: A step-by-step guide for libraries , 2006 .

[57]  Stefania Mariano,et al.  The construct of absorptive capacity in knowledge management and intellectual capital research: content and text analyses , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[58]  Sue Stone,et al.  Humanities scholars: Information Needs and Uses , 1982, J. Documentation.

[59]  Sheenagh Pietrobruno.  Between narratives and lists: performing digital intangible heritage through global media , 2014 .

[60]  D. Price,et al.  Little Science, Big Science and Beyond , 1986 .

[61]  Jinbo Song,et al.  A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: analysis and visualization , 2016, Scientometrics.

[62]  Shouyang Wang,et al.  Exploring evolution and emerging trends in business model study: a co-citation analysis , 2017, Scientometrics.

[63]  Qin He,et al.  Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[64]  Gerben Zaagsma,et al.  On Digital History , 2013 .

[65]  Daniel G. Tracy,et al.  Assessing Digital Humanities Tools: Use of Scalar at a Research University , 2016 .

[66]  Ping Xie.  Study of international anticancer research trends via co-word and document co-citation visualization analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[67]  Ricardo Eito-Brun,et al.  50 years of space research in Europe: a bibliometric profile of the European Space Agency (ESA) , 2016, Scientometrics.

[68]  Susan Hockey,et al.  The History of Humanities Computing , 2007 .

[69]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[70]  Xing Zhai,et al.  Rehabilitation using virtual reality technology: a bibliometric analysis, 1996–2015 , 2016, Scientometrics.

[71]  C. D. Green,et al.  A digital future for the history of psychology? , 2016, History of psychology.