The effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions delivered by community pharmacists: randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS To undertake the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists to reduce hazardous or harmful drinking. DESIGN This parallel group randomized trial allocated participants individually to brief alcohol intervention (n = 205) or a leaflet-only control condition (n = 202), with follow-up study after 3 months. SETTING Sixteen community pharmacies in one London Borough, UK. PARTICIPANTS A total of 407 pharmacy customers (aged 18 years or over) with Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) scores 8-19, inclusive. INTERVENTION A brief motivational discussion of approximately 10 minutes' duration, for which 17 pharmacists received a half-day of training. MEASUREMENTS Hazardous or harmful drinking was assessed using the AUDIT administered by telephone by a researcher blind to allocation status. The two primary outcomes were: (1) change in AUDIT total scores and (2) the proportions no longer hazardous or harmful drinkers (scoring < 8) at 3 months. The four secondary outcomes were: the three subscale scores of the AUDIT (for consumption, problems and dependence) and health status according to the EQ-5D (a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome). FINDINGS At 3 months 326 (80% overall; 82% intervention, 78% control) participants were followed-up. The difference in reduction in total AUDIT score (intervention minus control) was -0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.59 to 0.45, P = 0.28. The odds ratio for AUDIT ˂ 8 (control as reference) was 0.87, 95% CI = 0.50 to 1.51, P = 0.61). For two of the four secondary outcomes (dependence score: -0.46, 95% CI = -0.82 to -0.09, P = 0.014; health status score: -0.09, 95% CI = -0.16 to -0.02, P = 0.013) the control group did better, and in the other two there were no differences (consumption score: -0.05, 95% CI = -0.54 to 0.44, P = 0.85; non-dependence problems score: -0.13, 95% CI = -0.66 to 0.41). Sensitivity analyses did not change these findings. CONCLUSIONS A brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists appears to have had no effect in reducing hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption.

[1]  J. Mccambridge,et al.  Mechanisms of Action of Brief Alcohol Interventions Remain Largely Unknown – A Narrative Review , 2014, Front. Psychiatry.

[2]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Research participation effects: a skeleton in the methodological cupboard , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  A. Sorhaindo,et al.  Patient preferences and performance bias in a weight loss trial with a usual care arm☆☆☆ , 2014, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  D. Elbourne,et al.  In randomization we trust? There are overlooked problems in experimenting with people in behavioral intervention trials☆ , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  J. Mccambridge,et al.  The early history of ideas on brief interventions for alcohol , 2014, Addiction.

[6]  K. Kypri,et al.  Regression to the mean and alcohol consumption: A cohort study exploring implications for the interpretation of change in control groups in brief intervention trials , 2014, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[7]  S. Rollnick,et al.  Should brief interventions in primary care address alcohol problems more strongly? , 2013, Addiction.

[8]  P. Milligan,et al.  Alcohol brief intervention in community pharmacies: a feasibility study of outcomes and customer experiences , 2013, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

[9]  J. Mccambridge Brief intervention content matters , 2013, Drug and alcohol review.

[10]  A. Edwards,et al.  Training practitioners to deliver opportunistic multiple behaviour change counselling in primary care: a cluster randomised trial , 2013, BMJ.

[11]  P. Milligan,et al.  The impact of training and delivering alcohol brief intervention on the knowledge and attitudes of community pharmacists: a before and after study. , 2013, Drug and alcohol review.

[12]  C. Whittlesea,et al.  Effectiveness of alcohol brief intervention delivered by community pharmacists: study protocol of a two-arm randomised controlled trial , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[13]  N. Heather,et al.  Effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care (SIPS trial): pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial , 2013, BMJ.

[14]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Can Simply Answering Research Questions Change Behaviour? Systematic Review and Meta Analyses of Brief Alcohol Intervention Trials , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  M. Tully Pharmacy Practice Research 2011 , 2011 .

[16]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Effects of Study Design and Allocation on participant behaviour - ESDA: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2011, Trials.

[17]  P. Milligan,et al.  Community pharmacy service users' views and perceptions of alcohol screening and brief intervention. , 2010, Drug and alcohol review.

[18]  Helen Young,et al.  Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations , 2010 .

[19]  A. Blenkinsopp,et al.  The feasibility of providing community pharmacy‐based services for alcohol misuse: A literature review , 2009, The International journal of pharmacy practice.

[20]  A. Team Reducing Alcohol Harm: Health services in England for alcohol misuse , 2009 .

[21]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analyses of strategies targeting alcohol problems in emergency departments: interventions reduce alcohol-related injuries. , 2008, Addiction.

[22]  N. Heather,et al.  Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  R. Room,et al.  Alcohol and public health , 2005, The Lancet.

[24]  J. Strang,et al.  Development of a structured generic drug intervention model for public health purposes: a brief application of motivational interviewing with young people. , 2003, Drug and alcohol review.

[25]  R. Rosenthal Covert communication in classrooms, clinics, courtrooms, and cubicles. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[26]  J. Finney,et al.  Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations. , 2002, Addiction.

[27]  Regina Y. Liu Bootstrap Procedures under some Non-I.I.D. Models , 1988 .

[28]  International Pharmaceutical Federation , 1976 .

[29]  THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION , 1954 .

[30]  A. Team,et al.  AUDIT(Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test)を用いた自己スクリーニングとセルフ教材が勤労男性の問題飲酒に及ぼす影響 , 2017 .

[31]  Thomas Babor,et al.  Brief intervention for hazardous and harmful drinking: a manual for use in primary care. , 2001 .

[32]  Maristela Monteiro,et al.  AUDIT - The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care. , 2001 .

[33]  A. Kasuya EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. , 1990, Health policy.

[34]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .