Safety propensity index for signalized and unsignalized intersections: exploration and assessment.

The objective of this study is to develop a safety propensity index (SPI) for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. Through the use of a structural equation modelling (SEM) approach safety is quantified in terms of multiple endogenous variables and related to various dimensions of exogenous variables. The singular valued SPI allows for identification of relationships between variables and lends itself well to a comparative analysis between models. The data provided by the Highway Safety Information System (HSIS) for the California transportation network was utilized for analysis. In total 22,422 collisions at unsignalized intersections and 20,215 collisions at signalized intersections (occurring between 2006 and 2010) were considered in the final models. The main benefits of the approach and the subsequent development of an SPI are (1) the identification of pertinent variables that effect safety at both intersection types, (2) the identification of similarities and differences at both types of intersections through model comparison, and (3) the quantification of safety in the form of an index such that a ranking system can be developed. If further developed, the adopted methodology may assist in safety related decision making and policy analysis.

[1]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Exploring the Association between Traffic Safety and Geometric Design Consistency Based on Vehicle Speed Metrics , 2013 .

[2]  G. Bham,et al.  Multinomial Logistic Regression Model for Single-Vehicle and Multivehicle Collisions on Urban U.S. Highways in Arkansas , 2012 .

[3]  Inge S. Helland,et al.  On the Interpretation and Use of R 2 in Regression Analysis , 1987 .

[4]  Naveen Eluru,et al.  Examining the influence of aggressive driving behavior on driver injury severity in traffic crashes. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Temporal and spatial analyses of rear-end crashes at signalized intersections. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Tom Brijs,et al.  Evaluation of traffic safety at un-signalized intersections using microsimulation: a utilization of proximal safety indicators , 2009 .

[7]  Matthew G Karlaftis,et al.  Effects of road geometry and traffic volumes on rural roadway accident rates. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  David A Noyce,et al.  Injury Severity of Multivehicle Crash in Rainy Weather , 2010 .

[9]  Samer H. Hamdar,et al.  Interrupted versus uninterrupted flow: a safety propensity index for driver behavior. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Poul Greibe,et al.  Accident prediction models for urban roads. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  J. Ramalho-Santos,et al.  Cronbach's alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales , 1999 .

[12]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  DESIGN SPEED, OPERATING SPEED AND POSTED SPEED LIMIT PRACTICES , 2003 .

[13]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Exploring the overall and specific crash severity levels at signalized intersections. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Hoong Chor Chin,et al.  Applying the random effect negative binomial model to examine traffic accident occurrence at signalized intersections. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Negative binomial analysis of intersection accident frequencies , 1996 .

[16]  T. O. Kvålseth.  Cautionary Note about R 2 , 1985 .

[17]  Chao Wang,et al.  Road Traffic Congestion and Crash Severity: Econometric Analysis Using Ordered Response Models , 2010 .

[18]  Klaas Sijtsma,et al.  On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha , 2008, Psychometrika.

[19]  Samer H. Hamdar,et al.  Aggressiveness propensity index for driving behavior at signalized intersections. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Analyzing angle crashes at unsignalized intersections using machine learning techniques. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Predicting Injury Severity Levels in Traffic Crashes: A Modeling Comparison , 2004 .

[22]  Shauna L. Hallmark,et al.  Roadway Lighting Shows Safety Benefits at Rural Intersections , 2010 .

[23]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[24]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  Estimating Rear-End Accident Probabilities at Signalized Intersections: Occurrence-Mechanism Approach , 2003 .

[25]  Jarkko Niittymäki,et al.  General fuzzy rule base for isolated traffic signal control‐rule formulation , 2001 .

[26]  Simon Washington,et al.  Modeling crash types: New insights into the effects of covariates on crashes at rural intersections , 2006 .

[27]  Faming Liang,et al.  Crash Injury Severity Analysis Using a Bayesian Ordered Probit Model , 2007 .

[28]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[29]  Xing Zheng,et al.  An adaptive control algorithm for traffic-actuated signals , 2013 .

[30]  Walid Abdelwahab,et al.  JOINT EFFECTS OF ACCESS AND GEOMETRY ON TWO-LANE RURAL HIGHWAY SAFETY IN BRITISH COLUMBIA , 1994 .

[31]  J. Bared,et al.  Accident Models for Two-Lane Rural Segments and Intersections , 1998 .

[32]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Examining traffic crash injury severity at unsignalized intersections. , 2010, Journal of safety research.

[33]  Jin-Hyuk Chung,et al.  Analysis of traffic accident size for Korean highway using structural equation models. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Maurizio Guida,et al.  Microsimulation Approach for Predicting Crashes at Unsignalized Intersections Using Traffic Conflicts , 2012 .