Magnetocardiographic Intra‐QRS Fragmentation Analysis in the Identification of Patients with Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia after Myocardial Infarction

KORHONEN, P., et al.: Magnetocardiographic Intra‐QRS Fragmentation Analysis in the Identification of Patients with Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia after Myocardial Infarction. The aim of this study was to investigate if magnetocardiographic (MCG) analysis of cardiac micropotentials within the QRS complex can identity patients prone to ventricular arrhythmias, and to compare it to MCG time‐domain, late‐field analysis. The study population consisted of 136 patients with remote MI, 53 with and 83 without a history of VT. After averaging and high pass filtering of multichannel MCG signals, time‐domain parameters describing the end‐QRS activity and fragmentation index M and score S describing the whole QRS complex were computed. Fragmentation and time‐domain parameters differed between the VT and control groups: fragmentation index M was 12 ± 3 versus 9 ± 2 (P < 0.001), fragmentation score S was 83 ± 42 versus 56 ± 21 (P < 0.001), and filtered QRS duration was 144 ± 32 versus 114 ± 19 ms (P < 0.001) in VT and control groups, respectively. A combination of fragmentation parameters yielded 87% sensitivity and 61% specificity in VT identification. Corresponding figures for a time‐domain parameter combination were 81% and 72%. Sensitivity of time‐domain analysis was 88% and specificity was 75% in a subgroup with anterior MI. In multivariate analysis, fragmentation and time‐domain analyses discriminated VT patients from controls independently of the extent of coronary artery disease or left ventricular dysfunction. MCG in postinfarction patients reveals pathology associated with propensity to ventricular arrhythmias inside and not only at the end of the QRS complex. MCG seems most accurate in the anterior infarct location.

[1]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Late Fields of the Magnetocardiographic QRS Complex as Indicators of Propensity to Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia after Myocardial Infarction , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  E. Caref,et al.  Improved diagnostic value of combined time and frequency domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram after myocardial infarction. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  L Trahms,et al.  Magnetocardiographic analysis of the two-dimensional distribution of intra-QRS fractionated activation. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  M. Keller,et al.  A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P Lander,et al.  Analysis of abnormal intra-QRS potentials. Improved predictive value for arrhythmic events with the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1997, Circulation.

[6]  N Engl,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. , 1997, Circulation.

[7]  M Borggrefe,et al.  Predictive value of wavelet correlation functions of signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients after anterior versus inferior myocardial infarction. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  L. Horan,et al.  The Comparative Predictive Accuracy of Spectral Turbulence Analysis and Time‐Domain Analysis for Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Postinfarction Patients with Conduction Defects , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[9]  T. Katila,et al.  High-resolution and signal-averaged electrocardiography to separate post-myocardial infarction patients with and without ventricular tachycardia. , 1994, European heart journal.

[10]  L Toivonen,et al.  Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction by high-resolution magnetocardiography and electrocardiography. , 1993, Journal of electrocardiology.

[11]  E. Caref,et al.  Spectral turbulence analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and its predictive accuracy for inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Standards for analysis of ventricular late potentials using high resolution or signal-averaged electrocardiography. A statement by a Task Force Committee between the European Society of Cardiology, the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. , 1991, European heart journal.

[13]  T. Katila,et al.  Analysis of High Resolution MCG Recordings of Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 1989 .

[14]  J. Lekkala,et al.  Comparative study of the normal vector magnetocardiogram and vector electrocardiogram. , 1986, Journal of electrocardiology.

[15]  A H Harken,et al.  Relation between late potentials on the body surface and directly recorded fragmented electrograms in patients with ventricular tachycardia. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  M. Simson Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[17]  R Lazzara,et al.  Recording from the body surface of arrhythmogenic ventricular activity during the S-T segment. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.