Entanglement certification from theory to experiment

Entanglement is an important resource for quantum technologies. There are many ways quantum systems can be entangled, ranging from the two-qubit case to entanglement in high dimensions or between many parties. Consequently, many entanglement quantifiers and classifiers exist, corresponding to different operational paradigms and mathematical techniques. However, for most quantum systems, exactly quantifying the amount of entanglement is extremely demanding, if at all possible. Furthermore, it is difficult to experimentally control and measure complex quantum states. Therefore, there are various approaches to experimentally detect and certify entanglement when exact quantification is not an option. The applicability and performance of these methods strongly depend on the assumptions regarding the involved quantum states and measurements, in short, on the available prior information about the quantum system. In this Review, we discuss the most commonly used quantifiers of entanglement and survey the state-of-the-art detection and certification methods, including their respective underlying assumptions, from both a theoretical and an experimental point of view.Entanglement is often considered the defining feature separating classical physics from quantum physics and provides the basis for many quantum technologies. This Review discusses recent progress in the challenging task of conclusively proving that a physical system features entanglement, surveying detection and certification methods.Key pointsEntanglement detection and certification are of high significance for ensuring the security of quantum communication, improving the sensitivity of sensing devices, and benchmarking devices for quantum computation and simulation.Recent years have seen continuous progress in the development of tools for entanglement certification and an increase in control over a wide variety of experimental setups suitable for entanglement creation.Goals for the development of entanglement detection techniques are device-independence and assumption-free certification.Current challenges include the extension of well-understood methods for two qubits to many-body and/or high-dimensional quantum systems and their application in entanglement experiments with ions, atoms and photons.An important focus of recent research is the reduction in the number of measurements required for entanglement certification to cope with increasing system dimensions.

[1]  Nathan K Langford,et al.  Generation of hyperentangled photon pairs. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[2]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Entanglement and extreme planar spin squeezing , 2017, 1705.09090.

[3]  Matej Pivoluska,et al.  Measurements in two bases are sufficient for certifying high-dimensional entanglement , 2017, Nature Physics.

[4]  J. Cirac,et al.  Improvement of frequency standards with quantum entanglement , 1997, quant-ph/9707014.

[5]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement , 2000, Nature.

[6]  M. Reed Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I: Functional Analysis , 1972 .

[7]  B. Lanyon,et al.  Observation of entangled states of a fully-controlled 20 qubit system , 2017, 1711.11092.

[8]  Morgan W. Mitchell,et al.  Simultaneous tracking of spin angle and amplitude beyond classical limits , 2017, Nature.

[9]  R. Namiki,et al.  Spin squeezing of a cold atomic ensemble with the nuclear spin of one-half. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[10]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Mixed-State Entanglement and Distillation: Is there a “Bound” Entanglement in Nature? , 1998, quant-ph/9801069.

[11]  J. P. Woerdman,et al.  Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[12]  Laura Mančinska,et al.  Everything You Always Wanted to Know About LOCC (But Were Afraid to Ask) , 2012, 1210.4583.

[13]  Noah Linden,et al.  A ug 2 01 3 Inequalities for the Ranks of Quantum States , 2014 .

[14]  R. B. Blakestad,et al.  Creation of a six-atom ‘Schrödinger cat’ state , 2005, Nature.

[15]  D. James,et al.  Qubit quantum state tomography , 2004 .

[16]  J. Whitfield,et al.  Quantum Simulation of Helium Hydride Cation in a Solid-State Spin Register. , 2014, ACS nano.

[17]  B. Lanyon,et al.  Universal Digital Quantum Simulation with Trapped Ions , 2011, Science.

[18]  Geza Toth Entanglement witnesses in spin models , 2005 .

[19]  Christoph Simon,et al.  Three-photon energy–time entanglement , 2012, Nature Physics.

[20]  L. Pezzè,et al.  Entanglement, nonlinear dynamics, and the heisenberg limit. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[21]  G. Vidal On the characterization of entanglement , 1998 .

[22]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum metrology. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[23]  K. R. Brown,et al.  Microwave quantum logic gates for trapped ions , 2011, Nature.

[24]  Anthony D. Castellano,et al.  Genuine 12-Qubit Entanglement on a Superconducting Quantum Processor. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[25]  M. Horodecki,et al.  The asymptotic entanglement cost of preparing a quantum state , 2000, quant-ph/0008134.

[26]  Roman Orus,et al.  A Practical Introduction to Tensor Networks: Matrix Product States and Projected Entangled Pair States , 2013, 1306.2164.

[27]  L. Pezzè,et al.  Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles , 2016, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[28]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Collective state measurement of mesoscopic ensembles with single-atom resolution. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[29]  C. F. Roos,et al.  Efficient tomography of a quantum many-body system , 2016, Nature Physics.

[30]  H. M. Bharath,et al.  Adiabatic quenches and characterization of amplitude excitations in a continuous quantum phase transition , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Gerardo Adesso,et al.  Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful? , 2016, Physical review letters.

[32]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Quantum entanglement , 2007, quant-ph/0702225.

[33]  P. Kunkel,et al.  Spatially distributed multipartite entanglement enables EPR steering of atomic clouds , 2017, Science.

[34]  Zahra Raissi Sharif,et al.  Maximally Entangled Set of Multipartite Quantum States , 2015 .

[35]  W. Wootters,et al.  Distributed Entanglement , 1999, quant-ph/9907047.

[36]  Reconstructing quantum states efficiently , 2010, 1002.3780.

[37]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Maximally Non-Local and Monogamous Quantum Correlations , 2006, Physical review letters.

[38]  James K Thompson,et al.  Conditional spin squeezing of a large ensemble via the vacuum Rabi splitting. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[39]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Experimental quantum teleportation , 1997, Nature.

[40]  B. Terhal Bell inequalities and the separability criterion , 1999, quant-ph/9911057.

[41]  J. Eisert,et al.  Quantum many-body systems out of equilibrium , 2014, Nature Physics.

[42]  Géza Tóth,et al.  Entanglement between two spatially separated atomic modes , 2017, Science.

[43]  T. Monz,et al.  An open-system quantum simulator with trapped ions , 2011, Nature.

[44]  Anton Zeilinger,et al.  Experimental access to higher-dimensional entangled quantum systems using integrated optics , 2015, 1502.06504.

[45]  Jing-Ling Chen,et al.  Measure of genuine multipartite entanglement with computable lower bounds , 2011, 1101.2001.

[46]  R. Ursin,et al.  Distribution of high-dimensional entanglement via an intra-city free-space link , 2016, Nature Communications.

[47]  Robert Fickler,et al.  Measuring azimuthal and radial modes of photons. , 2018, Optics express.

[48]  N. Linke,et al.  High-Fidelity Quantum Logic Gates Using Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[49]  Debbie Leung,et al.  Typical entanglement of stabilizer states , 2005, quant-ph/0510232.

[50]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[51]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Experimental Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement beyond qubits , 2018, Nature Photonics.

[52]  C. Mora,et al.  Class of positive-partial-transpose bound entangled states associated with almost any set of pure entangled states , 2006, quant-ph/0607061.

[53]  F. Schmidt-Kaler,et al.  Assessing the progress of trapped-ion processors towards fault-tolerant quantum computation , 2017, 1705.02771.

[54]  A. Winter,et al.  “Squashed entanglement”: An additive entanglement measure , 2003, quant-ph/0308088.

[55]  Gerardo Adesso,et al.  Continuous Variable Quantum Information: Gaussian States and Beyond , 2014, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[56]  Wineland,et al.  Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[57]  A Retzker,et al.  Trapped-Ion Quantum Logic with Global Radiation Fields. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[58]  O. Gühne,et al.  Quantifying Entanglement of Maximal Dimension in Bipartite Mixed States. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[59]  M. Nielsen Conditions for a Class of Entanglement Transformations , 1998, quant-ph/9811053.

[60]  T. Moroder,et al.  Taming multiparticle entanglement. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[61]  Adetunmise C. Dada,et al.  Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities , 2011, 1104.5087.

[62]  F. Schmidt-Kaler,et al.  Scalable Creation of Long-Lived Multipartite Entanglement. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[63]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[64]  G. Tóth,et al.  Entanglement detection , 2008, 0811.2803.

[65]  F. Verstraete,et al.  General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[66]  P. Horodecki,et al.  Schmidt number for density matrices , 1999, quant-ph/9911117.

[67]  N. J. Engelsen,et al.  Bell Correlations in Spin-Squeezed States of 500 000 Atoms. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[68]  P. Grangier,et al.  Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment : A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities , 1982 .

[69]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Universal Quantum Simulators , 1996, Science.

[70]  Marco T'ulio Quintino,et al.  Better local hidden variable models for two-qubit Werner states and an upper bound on the Grothendieck constant $K_G(3)$ , 2016, 1609.06114.

[71]  Klaus Mølmer,et al.  Entanglement and extreme spin squeezing. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[72]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Detecting non-locality in multipartite quantum systems with two-body correlation functions , 2013, 1306.6860.

[73]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Gaussian quantum information , 2011, 1110.3234.

[74]  R. Jozsa,et al.  On the role of entanglement in quantum-computational speed-up , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[75]  John M. Martinis,et al.  State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit , 2015, Nature.

[76]  John Chiaverini,et al.  Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges , 2019, Applied Physics Reviews.

[77]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Free-Space distribution of entanglement and single photons over 144 km , 2006, quant-ph/0607182.

[78]  Martin B. Plenio,et al.  Entanglement on mixed stabilizer states: normal forms and reduction procedures , 2005, quant-ph/0505036.

[79]  Harry Buhrman,et al.  The quantum technologies roadmap: a European community view , 2018, New Journal of Physics.

[80]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Bell-Type Test of Energy-Time Entangled Qutrits , 2004 .

[81]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[82]  Emanuel Knill,et al.  High Fidelity Universal Gate Set for 9Be+ Ion Qubits | NIST , 2016 .

[83]  R Raussendorf,et al.  A one-way quantum computer. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[84]  Reid,et al.  Demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[85]  M. Aspelmeyer,et al.  Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical oscillators , 2017, Nature.

[86]  R. Blatt,et al.  Quantum simulations with trapped ions , 2011, Nature Physics.

[87]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[88]  A. Vaziri,et al.  Experimental two-photon, three-dimensional entanglement for quantum communication. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[89]  Robin Blume-Kohout,et al.  Maximum likelihood quantum state tomography is inadmissible , 2018, 1808.01072.

[90]  Franco Nori,et al.  Quantum spin squeezing , 2010, 1011.2978.

[91]  U. Schollwoeck The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states , 2010, 1008.3477.

[92]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Quantifying Photonic High-Dimensional Entanglement. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[93]  Moore,et al.  Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[94]  Koji Azuma,et al.  Fundamental limitation on quantum broadcast networks , 2016, 1609.03994.

[95]  Philipp Treutlein,et al.  Quantum metrology with a scanning probe atom interferometer. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[96]  O. Gühne,et al.  Absolutely Maximally Entangled States of Seven Qubits Do Not Exist. , 2016, Physical Review Letters.

[97]  O. Gühne,et al.  Estimating entanglement measures in experiments. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[98]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions , 1998, quant-ph/9810080.

[99]  Ludovico Lami,et al.  Genuine-multipartite entanglement criteria based on positive maps , 2016, 1609.08126.

[100]  B. Kraus,et al.  Entanglement manipulation of multipartite pure states with finite rounds of classical communication , 2016, 1607.05145.

[101]  Meng Khoon Tey,et al.  QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT: Deterministic entanglement generation from driving through quantum phase transitions , 2017 .

[102]  P. Zoller,et al.  Many-particle entanglement with Bose–Einstein condensates , 2000, Nature.

[103]  Matthias Christandl,et al.  Tensor rank is not multiplicative under the tensor product , 2017, ArXiv.

[104]  Onur Hosten,et al.  Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms , 2016, Nature.

[105]  J. Latorre,et al.  Absolute maximal entanglement and quantum secret sharing , 2012, 1204.2289.

[106]  Oliver Rudolph Further Results on the Cross Norm Criterion for Separability , 2005, Quantum Inf. Process..

[107]  Carlos Palazuelos,et al.  Resource Theory of Entanglement with a Unique Multipartite Maximally Entangled State. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[108]  Marcus Huber,et al.  Detection of high-dimensional genuine multipartite entanglement of mixed states. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[109]  Mark R. Dowling,et al.  Energy as an entanglement witness for quantum many-body systems (15 pages) , 2004, quant-ph/0408086.

[110]  Ebrahim Karimi,et al.  Limitations to the determination of a Laguerre–Gauss spectrum via projective, phase-flattening measurement , 2014, 1401.3512.

[111]  O. Gühne,et al.  Entanglement criteria for Dicke states , 2013, 1305.2818.

[112]  V. Vuletić,et al.  States of an ensemble of two-level atoms with reduced quantum uncertainty. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[113]  Massimiliano Proietti,et al.  Independent high-purity photons created in domain-engineered crystals , 2017, 1712.07140.

[114]  J. Cirac,et al.  Experimental demonstration of quantum memory for light , 2004, Nature.

[115]  John Watrous Many Copies May Be Required for Entanglement Distillation , 2004 .

[116]  Werner,et al.  Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[117]  M. Steffen,et al.  Measurement of the Entanglement of Two Superconducting Qubits via State Tomography , 2006, Science.

[118]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  12-Photon Entanglement and Scalable Scattershot Boson Sampling with Optimal Entangled-Photon Pairs from Parametric Down-Conversion. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[119]  Matej Pivoluska,et al.  Layered quantum key distribution , 2017, 1709.00377.

[120]  Eric Lantz,et al.  Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in twin images. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[121]  B. Julsgaard,et al.  Experimental long-lived entanglement of two macroscopic objects , 2001, Nature.

[122]  Ueda,et al.  Squeezed spin states. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[123]  G. Tóth,et al.  Spin squeezing inequalities for arbitrary spin. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[124]  Johan Håstad,et al.  Tensor Rank is NP-Complete , 1989, ICALP.

[125]  Hans J. Briegel,et al.  Spin squeezing and entanglement , 2008, 0806.1048.

[126]  Oliver Rudolph A new class of entanglement measures , 2000, math-ph/0005011.

[127]  M. Horodecki,et al.  Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions , 1996, quant-ph/9605038.

[128]  M. Huber,et al.  Witnessing genuine multipartite entanglement with positive maps. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[129]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Classification of mixed three-qubit states. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[130]  Michael A. Nielsen,et al.  Majorization and the interconversion of bipartite states , 2001, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[131]  P. Windpassinger,et al.  Mesoscopic atomic entanglement for precision measurements beyond the standard quantum limit , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[132]  Michael J. Biercuk,et al.  Engineered 2D Ising interactions on a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins , 2012 .

[133]  Robin Blume-Kohout,et al.  Entanglement verification with finite data. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[134]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Generation and detection of atomic spin entanglement in optical lattices , 2015, Nature Physics.

[135]  A. J. Scott Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions , 2003, quant-ph/0310137.

[136]  Félix Bussières,et al.  Temporal Multimode Storage of Entangled Photon Pairs. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[137]  G. Vidal,et al.  Computable measure of entanglement , 2001, quant-ph/0102117.

[138]  D. Bruß,et al.  Are general quantum correlations monogamous? , 2011, Physical review letters.

[139]  Hermann Kampermann,et al.  Determining lower bounds on a measure of multipartite entanglement from few local observables , 2012, 1205.3119.

[140]  T. V'ertesi,et al.  More efficient Bell inequalities for Werner states , 2008, 0806.0096.

[141]  Cécilia Lancien,et al.  High-Dimensional Entanglement in States with Positive Partial Transposition. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[142]  O. Gühne,et al.  03 21 7 2 3 M ar 2 00 6 Scalable multi-particle entanglement of trapped ions , 2006 .

[143]  W. P. Bowen,et al.  Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: From concepts to applications , 2008, 0806.0270.

[144]  M. Plenio Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[145]  M W Mitchell,et al.  Spin-squeezing of a large-spin system via QND measurement DRAFT , 2011, 2012 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[146]  J. Cirac,et al.  Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways , 2000, quant-ph/0005115.

[147]  Jean-Daniel Bancal,et al.  Bell correlations in a Bose-Einstein condensate , 2016, Science.

[148]  Gilad Gour Family of concurrence monotones and its applications , 2005 .

[149]  Thomas Feurer,et al.  Versatile shaper-assisted discretization of energy–time entangled photons , 2013, 1310.4610.

[150]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[151]  M B Plenio,et al.  Measuring entanglement in condensed matter systems. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[152]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Entanglement with negative Wigner function of almost 3,000 atoms heralded by one photon , 2015, Nature.

[153]  Michal Horodecki,et al.  A Few Steps More Towards NPT Bound Entanglement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[154]  A. Politi,et al.  Manipulation of multiphoton entanglement in waveguide quantum circuits , 2009, 0911.1257.

[155]  Gilad Gour,et al.  Almost all multipartite qubit quantum states have trivial stabilizer , 2016, 1609.01327.

[156]  G. Buller,et al.  Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera , 2012, Nature Communications.

[157]  B. Kraus,et al.  Operational Multipartite Entanglement Measures. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[158]  James Schneeloch,et al.  Quantifying high-dimensional entanglement with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations , 2017, 1709.03626.

[159]  D. Hume,et al.  Scalable spin squeezing for quantum-enhanced magnetometry with Bose-Einstein condensates. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[160]  Ekert,et al.  Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[161]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Creating high dimensional entanglement using mode-locked lasers , 2002, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[162]  Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro,et al.  Quantification of multidimensional entanglement stored in a crystal , 2016, 1609.05033.

[163]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of Laguerre–Gaussian modes , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[164]  G. Tóth,et al.  Generation of macroscopic singlet states in a cold atomic ensemble. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[165]  J. Maldacena The Large-N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity , 1997, hep-th/9711200.

[166]  J. Cirac,et al.  Delocalized entanglement of atoms in optical lattices. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[167]  G. Tóth,et al.  Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement with two local measurements. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[168]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Quantum Information with Continuous Variables , 2004, quant-ph/0410100.

[169]  N. Gisin,et al.  Grothendieck's constant and local models for noisy entangled quantum states , 2006, quant-ph/0606138.

[170]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Equilibration, thermalisation, and the emergence of statistical mechanics in closed quantum systems , 2015, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[171]  Ryo Namiki,et al.  Unconditional quantum-noise suppression via measurement-based quantum feedback. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[172]  M. Fadel,et al.  Spatial entanglement patterns and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in Bose-Einstein condensates , 2017, Science.

[173]  Matison,et al.  Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories , 1972 .

[174]  M. J. Padgett,et al.  Bounds and optimisation of orbital angular momentum bandwidths within parametric down-conversion systems , 2011, 1112.3910.

[175]  M B Plenio,et al.  Spatial entanglement of bosons in optical lattices , 2013, Nature Communications.

[176]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[177]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[178]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[179]  K. Mølmer,et al.  SPIN SQUEEZING IN AN ENSEMBLE OF ATOMS ILLUMINATED WITH SQUEEZED LIGHT , 1997 .

[180]  R. Bertlmann,et al.  Bloch vectors for qudits , 2008, 0806.1174.

[181]  Yu Shi,et al.  Quantum Entanglement in Condensed Matter Systems , 2002 .

[182]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Schmidt number witnesses and bound entanglement , 2000, quant-ph/0009109.

[183]  S. Szarek,et al.  How often is a random quantum state k-entangled? , 2010, 1010.1485.

[184]  Graham P. Greve,et al.  Deterministic Squeezed States with Collective Measurements and Feedback. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[185]  G. Tóth,et al.  Multiparticle entanglement criteria for nonsymmetric collective variances , 2017, 1708.06986.

[186]  Jens Eisert,et al.  Quantitative entanglement witnesses , 2006, quant-ph/0607167.

[187]  Leonid Gurvits,et al.  Classical complexity and quantum entanglement , 2004, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[188]  T. Monz,et al.  14-Qubit entanglement: creation and coherence. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[189]  Otfried Guhne,et al.  Separability criteria for genuine multiparticle entanglement , 2009, 0905.1349.

[190]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[191]  J. Eisert,et al.  Colloquium: Area laws for the entanglement entropy , 2010 .

[192]  T. Paterek,et al.  Correlation-tensor criteria for genuine multiqubit entanglement , 2011, 1110.4108.

[193]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Experimental Ten-Photon Entanglement. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[194]  G. Tóth,et al.  Entanglement detection in the stabilizer formalism , 2005, quant-ph/0501020.

[195]  Michał Horodecki,et al.  Separability of Mixed Quantum States: Linear Contractions and Permutation Criteria , 2006, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[196]  C. Macchiavello,et al.  Quantum hypergraph states , 2012, 1211.5554.

[197]  M. B. Plenio,et al.  Quantifying entanglement with scattering experiments , 2014 .

[198]  Yong-Cheng Ou,et al.  Violation of monogamy inequality for higher-dimensional objects , 2006, quant-ph/0612127.

[199]  Leonid Gurvits Classical deterministic complexity of Edmonds' Problem and quantum entanglement , 2003, STOC '03.

[200]  G. Tóth,et al.  Multipartite entanglement and high precision metrology , 2010, 1006.4368.

[201]  D. Gross,et al.  Most quantum States are too entangled to be useful as computational resources. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[202]  B. Kraus,et al.  Transformations among Pure Multipartite Entangled States via Local Operations are Almost Never Possible , 2017, Physical Review X.

[203]  J. Eisert,et al.  Area laws for the entanglement entropy - a review , 2008, 0808.3773.

[204]  Christian Kurtsiefer,et al.  Experimental detection of multipartite entanglement using witness operators. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[205]  Shellee D. Dyer,et al.  A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015 .

[206]  O. Gühne,et al.  Relaxations of separability in multipartite systems: Semidefinite programs, witnesses and volumes , 2015, 1504.01029.

[207]  J. Eisert,et al.  Unifying several separability conditions using the covariance matrix criterion , 2008, 0803.0757.

[208]  W. Thirring,et al.  A Geometric picture of entanglement and Bell inequalities , 2001, quant-ph/0111116.

[209]  D. Gross,et al.  Efficient quantum state tomography. , 2010, Nature communications.

[210]  Heralded Polynomial-Time Quantum State Tomography , 2010, 1002.3839.

[211]  Yi-Kai Liu,et al.  Direct fidelity estimation from few Pauli measurements. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[212]  G. Tóth,et al.  Entanglement and extreme spin squeezing of unpolarized states , 2016, 1605.07202.

[213]  C. Gerving,et al.  Spin-nematic squeezed vacuum in a quantum gas , 2011, Nature Physics.

[214]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Pixel entanglement: experimental realization of optically entangled d=3 and d=6 qudits. , 2005 .

[215]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Detecting nonlocality in many-body quantum states , 2014, Science.

[216]  Oliver Rudolph Some properties of the computable cross-norm criterion for separability , 2002, quant-ph/0212047.

[217]  Xiongfeng Ma,et al.  Detecting multipartite entanglement structure with minimal resources , 2017, npj Quantum Information.

[218]  Nicolai Friis,et al.  Geometry of two-qubit states with negative conditional entropy , 2016, 1609.04144.

[219]  Christine Silberhorn,et al.  Continuous‐variable quantum information processing , 2010, 1008.3468.

[220]  B. Moor,et al.  Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways , 2001, quant-ph/0109033.

[221]  Augusto Smerzi,et al.  Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement , 2010, 1006.4366.

[222]  N. Bohr II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[223]  Marcus Huber,et al.  Weak randomness in device-independent quantum key distribution and the advantage of using high-dimensional entanglement , 2013, 1301.2455.

[224]  S. Massar,et al.  Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[225]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144km , 2007 .

[226]  M. Oberthaler,et al.  Squeezing and Entanglement in a Bose-Einstein Condensate , 2010 .

[227]  Cheng-Zhi Peng,et al.  Observation of eight-photon entanglement , 2011, Nature Photonics.

[228]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Observation of three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement , 1998, quant-ph/9810035.

[229]  J. Cirac,et al.  Goals and opportunities in quantum simulation , 2012, Nature Physics.

[230]  Otfried Gühne,et al.  Characterizing Genuine Multilevel Entanglement. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[231]  W. Ertmer,et al.  Satisfying the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen criterion with massive particles , 2015, Nature communications.

[232]  Michael Epping,et al.  Multi-partite entanglement can speed up quantum key distribution in networks , 2016, 1612.05585.

[233]  Laura Mančinska,et al.  Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics , 2018, Science.

[234]  Michael J. Biercuk,et al.  Engineered two-dimensional Ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins , 2012, Nature.

[235]  S. Wehner,et al.  Bell Nonlocality , 2013, 1303.2849.

[236]  A. Vaziri,et al.  Experimental quantum cryptography with qutrits , 2005, quant-ph/0511163.

[237]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Generation and confirmation of a (100 × 100)-dimensional entangled quantum system , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[238]  Giuliano Benenti,et al.  Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos , 2006 .

[239]  J. Eisert Entanglement in quantum information theory , 2006, quant-ph/0610253.

[240]  Ling-An Wu,et al.  A matrix realignment method for recognizing entanglement , 2003, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[241]  A. Sørensen,et al.  Spin squeezing of atomic ensembles via nuclear-electronic spin entanglement. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[242]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[243]  Entanglement and permutational symmetry. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[244]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Entangling Photons Radiated by Independent Pulsed Sources a , 1995 .

[245]  V. Vedral,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility as a macroscopic entanglement witness , 2005 .

[246]  Robert Fickler,et al.  Entanglement distribution beyond qubits or: How I stopped worrying and learned to love the noise , 2019 .

[247]  Peter Zoller,et al.  Measuring multipartite entanglement through dynamic susceptibilities , 2015, Nature Physics.

[248]  M. Fadel,et al.  Spatial entanglement patterns and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in a Bose-Einstein condensate , 2019, Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM) V: Quantum Technologies.

[249]  R. Blatt,et al.  Entangled states of trapped atomic ions , 2008, Nature.

[250]  Pavel Sekatski,et al.  Flexible resources for quantum metrology , 2016, 1610.09999.

[251]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Automated Search for new Quantum Experiments. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[252]  N. Wallach,et al.  Classification of multipartite entanglement of all finite dimensionality. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[253]  A. Varon,et al.  A trapped-ion-based quantum byte with 10−5 next-neighbour cross-talk , 2014, Nature Communications.

[254]  G. Tóth,et al.  Entanglement criteria based on local uncertainty relations are strictly stronger than the computable cross norm criterion , 2006, quant-ph/0604050.

[255]  W. Ertmer,et al.  Twin Matter Waves for Interferometry Beyond the Classical Limit , 2011, Science.

[256]  Giuseppe Vallone,et al.  Polarization entangled state measurement on a chip , 2010, CLEO: 2011 - Laser Science to Photonic Applications.

[257]  S. Danilin,et al.  Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in a three-level superconducting circuit , 2015, Nature Communications.

[258]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Quantifying high dimensional entanglement with two mutually unbiased bases , 2015, 1512.05315.

[259]  S. Wehner,et al.  Fully device-independent conference key agreement , 2017, 1708.00798.

[260]  Marcus Huber,et al.  Structure of multidimensional entanglement in multipartite systems. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[261]  G Weihs,et al.  Experimental demonstration of four-photon entanglement and high-fidelity teleportation. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[262]  W. Wootters Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two Qubits , 1997, quant-ph/9709029.

[263]  E. Polzik,et al.  Spin squeezed atoms: a macroscopic entangled ensemble created by light , 1999 .

[264]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states , 2006, quant-ph/0609130.

[265]  V. Vedral,et al.  Entanglement in Many-Body Systems , 2007, quant-ph/0703044.

[266]  Ashley Montanaro,et al.  Optimal Verification of Entangled States with Local Measurements. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[267]  G. Tóth,et al.  Evaluating convex roof entanglement measures. , 2014, Physical Review Letters.

[268]  J. Eisert,et al.  Multiparty entanglement in graph states , 2003, quant-ph/0307130.

[269]  L. Mandel,et al.  Generation of spin squeezing via continuous quantum nondemolition measurement , 2000, Physical review letters.

[270]  Gilad Gour,et al.  Monogamy of entanglement without inequalities , 2017, Quantum.

[271]  Ali Asadian,et al.  Heisenberg-Weyl Observables: Bloch vectors in phase space , 2015, 1512.05640.

[272]  J. Schmiedmayer,et al.  Integrated Mach–Zehnder interferometer for Bose–Einstein condensates , 2013, Nature Communications.

[273]  J H Eberly,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of high transverse entanglement in optical parametric down conversion. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[274]  J I de Vicente,et al.  Entangled Pure State Transformations via Local Operations Assisted by Finitely Many Rounds of Classical Communication. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[275]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[276]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems , 2008, 0907.2796.

[277]  P. Grangier,et al.  Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's Theorem , 1981 .

[278]  D. Bruß Characterizing Entanglement , 2001, quant-ph/0110078.

[279]  D. Gauthier,et al.  High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light , 2014, 1402.7113.

[280]  Guang-Can Guo,et al.  Entanglement Detection by Violations of Noisy Uncertainty Relations: A Proof of Principle. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[281]  Géza Tóth,et al.  Optimal spin squeezing inequalities detect bound entanglement in spin models. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[282]  M. Mitchell,et al.  Ultrasensitive Atomic Spin Measurements with a Nonlinear Interferometer , 2013, 1310.5889.

[283]  C. Macchiavello,et al.  Multipartite entanglement in quantum algorithms , 2010, 1007.4179.

[284]  Giuseppe Vallone,et al.  Polarization entangled states measurement on a chip , 2011, Optics + Optoelectronics.

[285]  J. Barrett Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality , 2001, quant-ph/0107045.

[286]  M. Oberthaler,et al.  Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit , 2010, Nature.

[287]  F. Illuminati,et al.  Entanglement in continuous-variable systems: recent advances and current perspectives , 2007, quant-ph/0701221.

[288]  M. Rispoli,et al.  Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system , 2015, Nature.

[289]  O. Gühne,et al.  Covariance matrices and the separability problem. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[290]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Bell Inequalities Tailored to Maximally Entangled States. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[291]  Christian Reimer,et al.  Quantum optical microcombs , 2019, Nature Photonics.

[292]  G. Tóth,et al.  Quantum metrology from a quantum information science perspective , 2014, 1405.4878.

[293]  M. Kasevich,et al.  Squeezed States in a Bose-Einstein Condensate , 2001, Science.

[294]  Hans J. Briegel,et al.  Multipartite entanglement in spin chains , 2005, quant-ph/0502160.

[295]  Guifre Vidal Entanglement monotones , 1998, quant-ph/9807077.

[296]  Giuseppe Vitagliano,et al.  Spin squeezing and entanglement for an arbitrary spin , 2013, 1310.2269.

[297]  Anders Karlsson,et al.  Security of quantum key distribution using d-level systems. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[298]  J. Eisert,et al.  Entanglement in Graph States and its Applications , 2006, quant-ph/0602096.

[299]  L. Pezzè,et al.  Resolution-enhanced entanglement detection , 2016, 1612.06320.

[300]  B. Lanyon,et al.  Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many-body system , 2014, Nature.

[301]  Sevag Gharibian,et al.  Strong NP-hardness of the quantum separability problem , 2008, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[302]  Géza Tóth,et al.  Detecting multiparticle entanglement of Dicke states. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[303]  R. Werner,et al.  State-Independent Uncertainty Relations and Entanglement Detection in Noisy Systems. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[304]  Roberto Morandotti,et al.  On-chip generation of high-dimensional entangled quantum states and their coherent control , 2017, Nature.

[305]  B. Moor,et al.  Normal forms and entanglement measures for multipartite quantum states , 2001, quant-ph/0105090.

[306]  Collective spin of 10^{11} hot atoms with reduced quantum uncertainty , 2018 .

[307]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Active learning machine learns to create new quantum experiments , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[308]  J. Eisert,et al.  Reliable quantum certification of photonic state preparations , 2014, Nature Communications.

[309]  S. Barnett,et al.  Measuring the orbital angular momentum of a single photon. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[310]  Runyao Duan,et al.  Tensor rank and stochastic entanglement catalysis for multipartite pure states. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[311]  V. Vuletić,et al.  Implementation of cavity squeezing of a collective atomic spin. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[312]  C. Schwemmer,et al.  Systematic errors in current quantum state tomography tools. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[313]  Manuel Gessner,et al.  Efficient entanglement criteria for discrete, continuous, and hybrid variables , 2016, 1608.02421.

[314]  O. Guhne,et al.  Multiparticle covariance matrices and the impossibility of detecting graph-state entanglement with two-particle correlations , 2010, 1006.1594.

[315]  Immanuel Bloch,et al.  Spatially Resolved Detection of a Spin-Entanglement Wave in a Bose-Hubbard Chain. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[316]  T. Harty,et al.  High-Fidelity Trapped-Ion Quantum Logic Using Near-Field Microwaves. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[317]  R. Mcweeny On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2000 .

[318]  J. Sperling,et al.  Multipartite entanglement witnesses. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[319]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Experimental GHZ Entanglement beyond Qubits , 2017, 1708.03881.

[320]  Martin B. Plenio,et al.  An introduction to entanglement measures , 2005, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[321]  Daniel J. Lum,et al.  Compressively characterizing high-dimensional entangled states with complementary, random filtering , 2016, 1605.04792.

[322]  M. Hastings Superadditivity of communication capacity using entangled inputs , 2009 .

[323]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Practical quantum key distribution with polarization entangled photons , 2005 .

[324]  H. Hofmann,et al.  Violation of local uncertainty relations as a signature of entanglement , 2002, quant-ph/0212090.

[325]  H. Briegel,et al.  Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[326]  J. Dressel,et al.  Benchmarks of nonclassicality for qubit arrays , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[327]  Vlatko Vedral,et al.  Crucial role of quantum entanglement in bulk properties of solids (4 pages) , 2004, quant-ph/0410138.

[328]  A. Osterloh,et al.  Constructing N-qubit entanglement monotones from antilinear operators (4 pages) , 2004, quant-ph/0410102.

[329]  W. Wootters,et al.  Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements , 1989 .

[330]  B E Anderson,et al.  Accurate and Robust Unitary Transformations of a High-Dimensional Quantum System. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[331]  Augusto Smerzi,et al.  Non-classical states of atomic ensembles: fundamentals and applications in quantum metrology , 2016 .

[332]  Kevin C. Cox,et al.  Reduced spin measurement back-action for a phase sensitivity ten times beyond the standard quantum limit , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[333]  M. B. Plenio,et al.  Quantum gates and memory using microwave-dressed states , 2011, Nature.

[334]  J. Siewert,et al.  Quantifying entanglement resources , 2014, 1402.6710.

[335]  Yun Li,et al.  Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology , 2010, Nature.

[336]  Guang-Can Guo,et al.  Experimental witness of genuine high-dimensional entanglement , 2018, Physical Review A.

[337]  T. Moroder,et al.  Entanglement witnesses for graph states: General theory and examples , 2011, 1106.1114.

[338]  Pérès Separability Criterion for Density Matrices. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[339]  Gilad Gour,et al.  Monogamy of the entanglement of formation , 2018, Physical Review A.

[340]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  10-Qubit Entanglement and Parallel Logic Operations with a Superconducting Circuit. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[341]  M. Padgett,et al.  Testing for entanglement with periodic coarse graining , 2015, 1506.01095.

[342]  Harry Buhrman,et al.  The European Quantum Technologies Roadmap , 2017, 1712.03773.

[343]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.