Teamwork in controlling multiple robots

Simultaneously controlling increasing numbers of robots requires multiple operators working together as a team. Helping operators allocate attention among different robots and determining how to construct the human-robot team to promote performance and reduce workload are critical questions that must be answered in these settings. To this end, we investigated the effect of team structure and search guidance on operators' performance, subjective workload, work processes and communication. To investigate team structure in an urban search and rescue setting, we compared a pooled condition, in which team members shared control of 24 robots, with a sector condition, in which each team member control half of all the robots. For search guidance, a notification was given when the operator spent too much time on one robot and either suggested or forced the operator to change to another robot. A total of 48 participants completed the experiment with two persons forming one team. The results demonstrate that automated search guidance neither increased nor decreased performance. However, suggested search guidance decreased average task completion time in Sector teams. Search guidance also influenced operators' teleoperation behaviors. For team structure, pooled teams experienced lower subjective workload than sector teams. Pooled teams communicated more than sector teams, but sector teams teleoperated more than pool teams.

[1]  Dana E. Sims,et al.  Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? , 2005 .

[2]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[3]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Building large-scale robot systems: Distributed role assignment in dynamic, uncertain domains , 2003 .

[4]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[5]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[6]  Prasanna Velagapudi,et al.  Process and Performance in Human-Robot Teams , 2011 .

[7]  M L Cummings,et al.  Choice modeling of relook tasks for UAV search missions , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[8]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Validating human-robot interaction schemes in multitasking environments , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[9]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[10]  E. Salas,et al.  Team cognition : understanding the factors that drive process and performance , 2004 .

[11]  T. Dickinson,et al.  Task structure, work structure, and team performance. , 1969 .

[12]  Paul Scerri,et al.  17. Scaling-up Human Control for Large UAV Teams , 2006 .

[13]  Prasanna Velagapudi,et al.  Choosing Autonomy Modes for Multirobot Search , 2010, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Jacob W. Crandall,et al.  Attention Allocation Efficiency in Human-UV Teams , 2007 .

[15]  E. Entin,et al.  Communication overhead: The hidden cost of team cognition. , 2004 .

[16]  Michael Lewis,et al.  USARSim: Simulation for the Study of Human-Robot Interaction , 2007 .