Spreading the Word: Geography, Policy and University Knowledge Diffusion

Using new data on citations to university patents and scientific publications, and measures of distance based on Google maps, we study how geography affects university knowledge diffusion. We show that knowledge flows from patents are localized in two respects: they decline sharply with distance up to about 100 miles, and they are strongly constrained by state borders, controlling for distance. While distance also constrains knowledge spillovers from publications, the state border does not. We investigate how the strength of the state border effect varies with university and state characteristics. It is larger for patents from public, as compared to private, universities and this is partly explained by the local development policies of universities. The border effect is larger in states with stronger non-compete laws that affect intra-state labor mobility, and those with greater reliance on in-state educated scientists and engineers. We confirm the impact of non-compete statutes by studying a policy reform in Michigan that introduced such restrictions.

[1]  Giovanni Peri,et al.  Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation , 2005, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[2]  L. Fleming,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Disentangling the Role of State Borders, Metropolitan Boundaries and Distance , 2010 .

[3]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Geographic Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations , 1993 .

[4]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[5]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  University Knowledge Transfer: Private Ownership, Incentives, and Local Development Objectives , 2009, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[6]  T. Åstebro,et al.  Universities, Entrepreneurship and Local Economic Development , 2009 .

[7]  James B. Rebitzer,et al.  Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: Some Evidence Concerning the Microfoundations of a High-Technology Cluster , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[9]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  Currency Unions in Prospect and Retrospect , 2010 .

[10]  James D. Adams,et al.  Research Productivity in a System of Universities , 1996 .

[11]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988 , 1995, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[12]  David Marsden,et al.  The growth of extended 'entry tournaments' and the decline of institutionalised occupational labour markets in Britain , 2010 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[14]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Regional Disadvantage? Non-Compete Agreements and Brain Drain , 2010 .

[15]  Guido M. Schuster,et al.  Real-time voice over packet-switched networks , 1998, IEEE Netw..

[16]  James D. Adams,et al.  Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity Growth , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Peter Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from Inventor- and Examiner-added Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[18]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Capturing Knowledge: The Location Decision of New Ph.D.s Working in Industry , 2009 .

[19]  Brent R. Moulton.  An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables on Micro Unit , 1990 .

[20]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[21]  Mark J. Garmaise.  Ties that Truly Bind: Noncompetition Agreements, Executive Compensation, and Firm Investment , 2011 .

[22]  Murat Torlak,et al.  A fast blind source separation for digital wireless applications , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).

[23]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Gone but not Forgotten: Knowledge Flows, Labor Mobility, and Enduring Social Relationships , 2006 .

[24]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[25]  James D. Adams,et al.  Comparative Localization of Academic and Industrial Spillovers , 2001 .

[26]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[27]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[28]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[29]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[30]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Innovation , 2006 .