Assessing the Geographic Representativeness of Genebank Collections: the Case of Bolivian Wild Potatoes

Abstract: Genebank collection databases can be used for ecogeographical studies under the assumption that the accessions are a geographically unbiased sample. We evaluated the representativeness of a collection of wild potatoes from Bolivia and defined and assessed four types of bias: species, species‐area, hotspot, and infrastructure. Species bias is the sampling of some species more often than others. Species‐area bias is a sampling that is disproportionate to the total area in which a species is found. Hotspot bias is the disproportionate sampling of areas with high levels of diversity. Infrastructure bias is the disproportionate sampling of areas near roads and towns. Each of these biases is present in the Bolivian wild potato collection. The infrastructure bias was strong: 60% of all wild potato accessions were collected within 2 km of a road, as opposed to 22%, if collections had been made randomly. This analysis can serve as a guide for future collecting trips. It can also provide baseline information for the application of genebank data in studies based on geographic information systems.

[1]  A. Winsor.  Sampling techniques. , 2000, Nursing times.

[2]  Eviatar Nevo,et al.  Molecular evolution and ecological stress at global, regional and local scales: The Israeli perspective , 1998 .

[3]  P. Ashton.  Collecting Plant Genetic Diversity: Technical Guidelines , 1998, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[4]  J. H. van den Berg,et al.  Collapse of morphological species in the wild potato Solanum brevicaule complex (Solanaceae: sect. Petota). , 1998, American journal of botany.

[5]  D. Spooner,et al.  Reexamination of series relationships of South American wild potatoes (Solanaceae: Solanum sect. Petota): evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. , 1997, American journal of botany.

[6]  Lee-Ann C. Hayek,et al.  Surveying natural populations , 1997 .

[7]  The Conservation of Plant Biodiversity , 1995 .

[8]  H. Balslev,et al.  Diversity of Huperzia (Lycopodiaceae) in Neotropical montane forests. , 1995 .

[9]  L. Guarino,et al.  An introduction to plant germplasm exploration and collecting: planning, methods and procedures, follow-up , 1995 .

[10]  F. Schueler,et al.  Mapping and GIS analysis of the global distribution of coral reef fishes on an equal-area grid , 1994 .

[11]  D. Spooner,et al.  A Reexamination of Species Boundaries between Solanum megistacrolobum and S. toralapanum (Solanum sect. Petota, series Megistacroloba): Morphological Data , 1994 .

[12]  D. Spooner,et al.  A reexamination of species boundaries and hypotheses of hybridization concerning Solanum megistacrolobum and S. toralapanum (Solanum sect. Petota, series Megistacroloba): molecular data , 1994 .

[13]  J. Lawton,et al.  Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies , 1993, Nature.

[14]  C. Ochoa.  The Potatoes of South America: Bolivia , 1991 .

[15]  J. G. Hawkes,et al.  The potato: evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources , 1990 .

[16]  S. Knapp.  The potatoes of Bolivia: Their breeding value and evolutionary relationships , 1990 .

[17]  A. Brown,et al.  Collection strategies for the wild relatives of field crops. , 1989 .

[18]  A. Magurran.  Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement , 1988, Springer Netherlands.

[19]  H. Ross.  Potato Breeding Problems and Perspectives , 1986 .

[20]  O. H. Frankel,et al.  Tactics of plant exploration. , 1970 .

[21]  O. Frankel,et al.  Genetic resources in plants-their exploration and conservation. , 1970 .

[22]  O. Frankel,et al.  Population structure and sampling methods. , 1970 .