Comparative Vegetative Growth Responses of Two Peach Cultivars Grown on Size-controlling versus Standard Rootstocks

Vegetative growth of two peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) cultivars Flavorcrest and Loadel growing on six different rootstocks ('Nemaguardʼ, 'Hiawathaʼ, K-146-43, K-146-44, P-30-135, and K-119-50) was analyzed during the third season of growth in an experimental orchard at the University of California Kearney Agricultural Center near Parlier, California. Seasonal trunk cross-sectional area, shoot and internode growth, diurnal stem extension growth rate and summer and dormant pruning weights were measured to determine extent of size-control imparted by the experimental rootstocks compared to the trees on the 'Nemaguardʼ control and to characterize the nature of the size- controlling response. Trunk cross-sectional area growth of trees on the two smallest rootstocks (K-146-43 and K-146-44) was only 25% to 37% of the growth of trees on 'Nemaguardʼ, while trees on the other three rootstocks provided an intermediate level of size control. Generally, the seasonal patterns of shoot growth did not vary substantially among trees on the different rootstocks, but average shoot and internode lengths did correspond with tree size. Vigorous watersprout growth was decreased by more than 80% in the trees on the least vigorous rootstocks compared to trees on 'Nemaguardʼ resulting in major reductions in the extent of summer and winter pruning weights. Variations in vegetative shoot growth appeared to correspond to variations in daily shoot extension growth rates but more research is needed to explore these relationships.

[1]  N. Childers Modern fruit science : orchard and small fruit culture , 1995 .

[2]  Theodore M. DeJong,et al.  EVALUATION OF SIZE CONTROLLING ROOTSTOCKS FOR CALIFORNIA PEACH PRODUCTION , 2001 .

[3]  R. Scorza,et al.  Reciprocal grafts of standard and dwarf peach alter dry-matter partitioning and root physiology , 1992 .

[4]  I. B. Wilson,et al.  Productivity of Peach Trees : Tree Growth and Water Stress in Relation to Fruit Growth and Assimilate Demand , 1978 .

[5]  T. Dejong,et al.  Diurnal patterns of stem extension growth in peach (Prunus persica): Temperature and fluctuations in water status determine growth rate , 1997 .

[6]  A. Felipe,et al.  'MONTIZO' AND 'MONPOL', TWO NEW PLUM ROOTSTOCKS FOR PEACHES , 1997 .

[7]  C. Forshey,et al.  Production Efficiency of a Large and a Small ‘McIntosh’ Apple Tree1 , 1970, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[8]  J. Marsal,et al.  Growth, yield and physiological behavior of size-controlling peach rootstocks developed in California , 2004 .

[9]  D. W. Mckenzie Rootstock-Scion Interaction in Apples with Special Reference to Root Anatomy , 1961 .

[10]  O. Jones MODE-OF-ACTION OF ROOTSTOCK/SCION INTERACTIONS IN APPLE AND CHERRY TREES , 1984 .

[11]  J. Crabbe MORPHOGENETICAL WAYS TOWARDS VIGOR RESTRICTION IN SPONTANEOUS AND MAN-MADE DWARF TREES , 1984 .

[12]  A. Lakso,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE DWARFING CHARACTER AND WATER RELATIONS OF FIVE APPLE ROOTSTOCKS , 1984 .

[13]  Kunihiko Suzuki,et al.  Dwarfing rootstock for peach. , 1990 .

[14]  T. Dejong,et al.  Water stress and crop load effects on fruit fresh and dry weights in peach (Prunus persica). , 1996, Tree physiology.

[15]  T. Dejong,et al.  Crop load and water stress effects on daily stem growth in peach (Prunus persica). , 1997, Tree physiology.

[16]  Paul J. Kramer,et al.  Physiology of Woody Plants , 1983 .

[17]  D W Henderson,et al.  Immediate and subsequent growth responses of maize leaves to changes in water status. , 1971, Plant physiology.

[18]  T. Dejong,et al.  Seasonal patterns of reproductive and vegetative sink activity in early and late maturing peach (Prunus persica) cultivars , 1987 .

[19]  A. D. Webster,et al.  RECENT ADVANCES IN STUDIES ON THE DWARFING MECHANISM OF APPLE ROOTSTOCKS , 1997 .

[20]  Kenneth A. Shackel,et al.  Stem-water Potential as a Sensitive Indicator of Water Stress in Prune Trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French) , 1992 .

[21]  Theodore M. DeJong,et al.  Comparative economic efficiency of four peach production systems in California , 1999 .

[22]  C. D. Murray A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CIRCUMFERENCE AND WEIGHT IN TREES AND ITS BEARING ON BRANCHING ANGLES , 1927, The Journal of general physiology.

[23]  A. P. Preston,et al.  Pruning and Rootstock as Factors in the Production of Primary Branches on Apple Trees , 1968 .