The porosity and permeability prediction methods for carbonate reservoirs with extremely limited logging data: Stepwise regression vs. N-way analysis of variance

Abstract The available theories and methods for logging interpretation have achieved lots of excellent outcomes in the silicate and carbonate formations. But due to the complicated pore-throat systems and developed fractures, many practical physical models suitable for the silicate formations often need to aid more parameters to character the carbonate, resulting in the difficulties increasing in the reservoir evaluation. As the multivariate linear regression has the capability to calculate targets only using fitting model as a simple linear equation, both useful algorithms of stepwise regression and N-way analysis of variance are proposed in the study of porosity and permeability prediction. The stepwise regression selects out the significant curves from the abundant logging data based on the variance contribution calculation and colinearity verification, thus making the established fitting model optimal. The N-way analysis of variance also performs well on the selection of the significant logs but its calculation only needs to conduct once. Additionally, according to the results of analysis of variance and multiple comparisons, those fitted values can be accurately corrected by the creative algorithm of fitting correction in further step. The logging data derived from three wells of LULA oilfield within Santos Basin are chosen to verify the proposed methods. In the porosity prediction, the mean absolute error of fitted results for the stepwise regression in all verified cases is 3.41, 3.87, 2.89, 3.62, 1.57, and for the N-way analysis of variance is 2.84, 2.68, 2.76, 2.92 and 1.19. In the permeability prediction, the error is 66.28, 1132 400, 146.8, 3617, 0.37 for the stepwise regression, and for the N-way is 48.34, 1098.4, 191.9, 3187.7 and 0.62. Through the verified effects of the cases, all the statistical results indicate that both proposed methods are capable to predict the porosity and permeability in a cost-efficient way. Meanwhile, through the multiple comparisons with the core data, the fitted values obtained by the N-way analysis of variance are more accurate than those from the stepwise regression in general.

[1]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[2]  G. E. Archie,et al.  Introduction to Petrophysics of Reservoir Rocks , 1950 .

[3]  Luiz Fernando De Ros,et al.  Infiltrated Clays in Fluvial Jurassic Sandstones of Reconcavo Basin, Northeastern Brazil , 1990 .

[4]  Xiaoliang Zhao,et al.  A simulation method for modified isochronal well testing to determine shale gas well productivity , 2015 .

[5]  A. Timur An Investigation Of Permeability, Porosity, And Residual Water Saturation Relationships , 1968 .

[6]  G A Diamond,et al.  Clinical trials and statistical verdicts: probable grounds for appeal. , 1983, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  N. Standish,et al.  Estimation of the Porosity of Particle Mixtures by a Linear-Mixture Packing Model , 1991 .

[8]  Gang Chen,et al.  Historical pipeline construction cost analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Sri Niwas,et al.  Estimation of hydraulic parameters of shaly sandstone aquifers from geoelectrical measurements , 2000 .

[10]  Jean Sulem,et al.  Evaluation of a permeability-porosity relationship in a low-permeability creeping material using a single transient test , 2009 .

[11]  Robert A. Wattenbarger,et al.  Triple-porosity Models: One Further Step Towards Capturing Fractured Reservoirs Heterogeneity , 2011 .

[12]  P. Szatmari,et al.  Style and pattern of salt diapirs due to thin-skinned gravitational gliding, Campos and Santos basins, offshore Brazil , 1993 .

[13]  Darwin V. Ellis,et al.  Well Logging for Earth Scientists , 1987 .

[14]  Xinwei Liao,et al.  Case studies on the CO2 storage and EOR in heterogeneous, highly water-saturated, and extra-low permeability Chinese reservoirs , 2016 .

[15]  A. P. Byrnes,et al.  Aspects of porosity prediction using multivariate linear regression , 1991 .

[16]  D. McLachlan,et al.  Measurement and analysis of a model dual-conductivity medium using a generalised effective-medium theory , 1988 .

[17]  M. Rosenblatt Remarks on a Multivariate Transformation , 1952 .

[18]  P. Cobbold,et al.  Segmentation of an obliquely rifted margin, Campos and Santos basins, southeastern Brazil , 2001 .

[19]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[20]  C. Cipolla,et al.  Reservoir Modeling in Shale-Gas Reservoirs , 2010 .

[21]  E. R. Atkins,et al.  The Significance of Particle Shape in Formation Resistivity Factor-Porosity Relationships , 1961 .

[22]  L. F. Athy Density, Porosity, and Compaction of Sedimentary Rocks , 1930 .

[23]  Zhenhua Rui,et al.  A new method to determine Biot's coefficients of Bakken samples , 2014 .

[24]  D. L. Luffel,et al.  New Core Analysis Methods for Measuring Reservoir Rock Properties of Devonian Shale , 1992 .

[25]  M. Nemčok,et al.  South Atlantic divergent margin evolution: rift-border uplift and salt tectonics in the basins of SE Brazil , 2008 .

[26]  W. Mohriak,et al.  South Atlantic Ocean Salt Tectonics, Volcanic Centers, Fracture Zones And Their Relationship With The Origin And Evolution Of The South Atlantic Ocean: Geophysical Evidence In The Brazilian And West African Margins. , 2001 .

[27]  Gang Chen,et al.  An analysis of inaccuracy in pipeline construction cost estimation , 2012 .

[28]  L. L. Raymer,et al.  An Improved Sonic Transit Time-To-Porosity Transform , 1980 .

[29]  John Killough,et al.  A New Approach for the Simulation of Fluid Flow In Unconventional Reservoirs Through Multiple Permeability Modeling , 2013 .

[30]  Mojtaba Asoodeh,et al.  Core Porosity Estimation through Different Training Approaches for Neural Network: Back-Propagation Learning vs. Genetic Algorithm , 2013 .

[31]  Cedric A. B. Smith,et al.  Personal Probability and Statistical Analysis , 1965 .

[32]  A. Taghavi Improved Permeability Estimation through use of Fuzzy Logic in a Carbonate Reservoir from Southwest, Iran , 2005 .

[33]  Xinwei Liao,et al.  The qualitative and quantitative fracture evaluation methodology in shale gas reservoir , 2015 .

[34]  Eugene R. Brush,et al.  Postrift sequence stratigraphy, paleogeography, and fill history of the deep-water Santos Basin, offshore southeast Brazil , 2004 .

[35]  P. H. Nelson,et al.  Permeability-porosity relationships in sedimentary rocks , 1994 .

[36]  Lei Wang,et al.  Review of multi-scale and multi-physical simulation technologies for shale and tight gas reservoirs , 2017 .

[37]  David S. Schechter,et al.  An integrated workflow for characterization and simulation of complex fracture networks utilizing microseismic and horizontal core data , 2016 .

[38]  Jincai Zhang,et al.  Pore pressure prediction from well logs: Methods, modifications, and new approaches , 2011 .

[39]  J. Dickey The Weighted Likelihood Ratio, Linear Hypotheses on Normal Location Parameters , 1971 .

[40]  Chen Zhiming,et al.  Semi-analytical model of the transient pressure behavior of complex fracture networks in tight oil reservoirs , 2016 .

[41]  Paul W. J. Glover,et al.  A generalized Archie’s law for n phases , 2010 .

[42]  Fei Peng,et al.  Development of industry performance metrics for offshore oil and gas project , 2017 .

[43]  Webster Ueipass Mohriak Salt Tectonics in Atlantic-Type Sedimentary Basins: Brazilian and West African Perspectives Applied to the North Atlantic Margin , 2005 .

[44]  Bjørn Ursin,et al.  Porosity and permeability prediction from wireline logs using artificial neural networks: a North Sea case study , 2001 .

[45]  Ian Davison Tectonics of the South Atlantic Brazilian Salt Basins , 2005 .

[46]  L. Vernik,et al.  Predicting lithology and transport properties from acoustic velocities based on petrophysical classification of siliciclastics , 1994 .

[47]  Cheng Xun-jie A Frequently Mistaken Concept in "Hypothesis Test" ——A dispute triggered by China Undergraduate Mathematical Contest in Modeling , 2013 .

[48]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[49]  Amir Maher Sayed Lala,et al.  The application of petrophysics to resolve fluid flow units and reservoir quality in the Upper Cretaceous Formations: Abu Sennan oil field, Egypt , 2015 .

[50]  M. Z. Kalam,et al.  Carbonate Reservoir Rock Typing - The Link between Geology and SCAL , 2008 .

[51]  Glenn L. Bowers,et al.  Pore Pressure Estimation From Velocity Data: Accounting for Overpressure Mechanisms Besides Undercompaction , 1995 .

[52]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[53]  S. Ehrenberg,et al.  Preservation of Anomalously High Porosity in Deeply Buried Sandstones by Grain-Coating Chlorite: Examples from the Norwegian Continental Shelf , 1992 .

[54]  S. Ings,et al.  Salt tectonics on passive margins: examples from Santos, Campos and Kwanza basins , 2012 .

[55]  H. J. Ramey,et al.  The Flow of Real Gases Through Porous Media , 1965 .

[56]  I. Davison Geology and tectonics of the South Atlantic Brazilian salt basins , 2007, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[57]  Roberto Fainstein,et al.  Offshore Brazil Santos Basin Exploration Potential From Recently Acquired Seismic Data , 2001 .

[58]  Jan Sperl PERMEABILITY AND POROSITY OF ROCKS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP BASED ON LABORATORY TESTING , 2008 .

[59]  Fred Kofi Boadu,et al.  Predicting oil saturation from velocities using petrophysical models and artificial neural networks , 2001 .

[60]  Nader Dutta,et al.  Geopressure prediction using seismic data: Current status and the road ahead , 2002 .

[61]  Seyed Ali Moallemi,et al.  A fuzzy logic approach for estimation of permeability and rock type from conventional well log data: an example from the Kangan reservoir in the Iran Offshore Gas Field , 2006 .

[62]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  Innovative methods for flow-unit and pore-structure analyses in a tight siltstone and shale gas reservoir , 2012 .

[63]  Albert Cui,et al.  A Nearly Complete Characterization of Permeability to Hydrocarbon Gas and Liquid for Unconventional Reservoirs: A Challenge to Conventional Thinking , 2013 .

[64]  J. Berger,et al.  Testing Precise Hypotheses , 1987 .

[65]  A. R. Gregory,et al.  ELASTIC WAVE VELOCITIES IN HETEROGENEOUS AND POROUS MEDIA , 1956 .

[66]  Fei Peng,et al.  Investigation into the performance of oil and gas projects , 2017 .

[67]  Ray Rui,et al.  Multi-index and two-level evaluation of shale gas reserve quality , 2016 .

[68]  G. E. Archie The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[69]  D. Lindley A STATISTICAL PARADOX , 1957 .

[70]  Amir Raoof,et al.  A New Method for Generating Pore-Network Models of Porous Media , 2010 .

[71]  Farzam Javadpour,et al.  Relationship of permeability, porosity and depth using an artificial neural network , 2000 .

[72]  Bruce S. Hart,et al.  Comparison of linear regression and a probabilistic neural network to predict porosity from 3‐D seismic attributes in Lower Brushy Canyon channeled sandstones, southeast New Mexico , 2001 .

[73]  Abbas Majdi,et al.  Identification of well logs with significant impact on prediction of oil and gas reservoirs permeability using statistical analysis of RSE values , 2010 .

[74]  A. Costa,et al.  Permeability‐porosity relationship: A reexamination of the Kozeny‐Carman equation based on a fractal pore‐space geometry assumption , 2006 .

[75]  Salvatore Torquato,et al.  Rigorous link between fluid permeability, electrical conductivity, and relaxation times for transport in porous media , 1991 .

[76]  J. Berger,et al.  Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence , 1987 .

[77]  K. Su,et al.  Experimental study on gas permeability of mudstones , 2008 .

[78]  F. Jerry Lucia,et al.  Carbonate Reservoir Characterization , 2002 .

[79]  S. Youssef,et al.  From computed microtomography images to resistivity index calculations of heterogeneous carbonates using a dual-porosity pore-network approach: influence of percolation on the electrical transport properties. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.