A Hybrid Decoupled Power Flow Method for Balanced Power Distribution Systems

This paper proposes a hybrid decoupled power flow method for balanced power distribution systems with distributed generation sources. The method formulates the power flow equations in active power and reactive power decoupled form with polar coordinates. Second-order terms are included in the active power mismatch iteration, and constant Jacobian and Hessian matrices are used. A hybrid direct and indirect solution technique is used to achieve efficiency and robustness of the algorithm. Active power correction is solved by means of a sparse lower triangular and upper triangular (LU) decomposition algorithm with partial pivoting, and the reactive power correction is solved by means of restarted generalized minimal residual algorithm with an incomplete LU pre-conditioner. Typical distribution generation models and distribution load models are included. The impact of zero-impedance branches is explicitly modeled through reconfiguring of the adjacent branches with impedances. Numerical examples on a sample distribution system with widespread photovoltaic installations are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  S. McFee,et al.  On the application of a pre-conditioned conjugate gradient algorithm to power network analysis , 1993, Conference Proceedings Power Industry Computer Application Conference.

[2]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  William F. Tinney,et al.  Power Flow Solution by Newton's Method , 1967 .

[4]  H. Chiang,et al.  Solving the nonlinear power flow equations with an inexact Newton method using GMRES , 1998 .

[5]  Robert A. W. van Amerongan A general-purpose version of the fast decoupled load flow , 1989 .

[6]  S. B. Patel Fast super decoupled loadflow , 1992 .

[7]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Improving power flow convergence by Newton Raphson with a Levenberg-Marquardt method , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[8]  Adam Semlyen Fundamental concepts of a Krylov subspace power flow methodology , 1996 .

[9]  Daniel Tylavsky,et al.  The effects of precision and small impedance branches on power flow robustness , 1994 .

[10]  Timothy A. Davis,et al.  Direct methods for sparse linear systems , 2006, Fundamentals of algorithms.

[11]  A. G. Exposito,et al.  Augmented Rectangular Load Flow Model , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[12]  O. Alsac,et al.  Fast Decoupled Load Flow , 1974 .

[13]  J. Nanda,et al.  New findings of convergence properties of fast decoupled load flow algorithms , 1991 .

[14]  S. Iwamoto,et al.  A Fast Load Flow Method Retaining Nonlinearity , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[15]  A. Semlyen,et al.  A New Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Power Flow , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[16]  Jen-Hao Teng Integration of distributed generators into distribution three-phase load flow analysis , 2005, 2005 IEEE Russia Power Tech.

[17]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[18]  M.S. Sachdev,et al.  A second order load flow technique , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[19]  Mark Ayres,et al.  Super Decoupled Loadflow with Distributed Slack Bus , 1985, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[20]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.