Temptations of turnout and modernisation: E-voting discourses in the UK and The Netherlands

Purpose – The aim of the research described was to identify reasons for differences between discourses on electronic voting in the UK and The Netherlands, from a qualitative point of view. Design/methodology/approach – From both countries, eight e-voting experts were interviewed on their expectations, risk estimations, cooperation and learning experiences. The design was based on the theory of strategic niche management. A qualitative analysis of the data was performed to refine the main variables and identify connections. Findings – The results show that differences in these variables can partly explain the variations in the embedding of e-voting in the two countries, from a qualitative point of view. Key differences include the goals of introducing e-voting, concerns in relation to verifiability and authenticity, the role of the Electoral Commissions and a focus on learning versus a focus on phased introduction. Research limitations/implications – The current study was limited to two countries. More empirical data can reveal other relevant subvariables, and contribute to a framework that can improve our understanding of the challenges of electronic voting. Originality/value – This study shows the context-dependent character of discussions on information security. It can be informative for actors involved in e-voting in the UK and The Netherlands, and other countries using or considering electronic voting.

[1]  Daan Lenstra,et al.  Reliability and security of information , 2006 .

[2]  Tim Storer,et al.  Electronic Voting in the UK: Current Trends in Deployment , Requirements and Technologies , 2005, PST.

[3]  Joe Mohen,et al.  The case for internet voting , 2001, CACM.

[4]  H. H. Asquith The Ballot in England , 1888 .

[5]  Charles Gross The Early History of the Ballot in England , 1898 .

[6]  Johan Schot,et al.  Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management , 2002 .

[7]  Wolter Pieters,et al.  Acceptance of Voting Technology: Between Confidence and Trust , 2006, iTrust.

[8]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  Electronic Voting in the United Kingdom: Lessons and Limitations from the UK Experience , 2004 .

[9]  R.J.F. Hoogma,et al.  Experimenting with sustainable transport innovations : a workbook for strategic niche management , 1999 .

[10]  Dan S. Wallach,et al.  Analysis of an electronic voting system , 2004, IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004. Proceedings. 2004.

[11]  Brian S. Krueger Point, Click, & Vote: The Future of Internet Voting and The Politics of Internet Communication , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[12]  Kristin Shrader-Frechette,et al.  Perceived Risks Versus Actual Risks: Managing Hazards through Negotiation , 1990 .

[13]  Rebecca T. Mercuri A better ballot box , 2002 .

[14]  Roy G. Saltman The history and politics of voting technology , 2006 .

[15]  P. Verbeek What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[16]  Hans A. von Spakovsky,et al.  Gauging the risks of internet elections , 2001, CACM.

[17]  R. Gibson,et al.  Elections Online: Assessing Internet Voting in Light of the Arizona Democratic Primary , 2001 .

[18]  E.M.G.M. Hubbers,et al.  Stemmen via internet geen probleem , 2004 .

[19]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[20]  Joseph H. Park,et al.  England's Controversy over the Secret Ballot , 1931 .