Cosmetic outcomes of infraumbilical, supraumbilical, and transumbilical entry routes in laparoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to determine which of the umbilical entry routes for intraperitoneal access has a better cosmetic result. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1). In total, 105 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were included. A vertical or transverse umbilical incision is appropriately made for the trocar to be inserted, and an infraumbilical, supraumbilical, or transumbilical route was preferred for initial intraperitoneal access. Demographic data of patients, body mass indices, entry point of the trocars (infraumbilical-transumbilical-supraumbilical), type of incision (vertical-transverse), duration of the operation, and scar properties at postoperative week 12 were prospectively collected and analyzed. The Vancouver scar scale was used to evaluate the cosmetic results. RESULTS Cosmetic results did not differ statistically between the transumbilical-infraumbilical-supraumbilical groups. The variables, such as vascularity, height, and total score, of the Vancouver scar scale were significantly higher in patients who had transverse incisions. There was no statistically significant effect of using a Veress needle with the cosmetic results. There was no statistically significant correlation between age, gravida, body mass indices, skin thickness, time of entry, duration of the operation, and cosmetic results in terms of vascularity, height, and total score. CONCLUSION During laparoscopic surgery, each patient should be assessed individually for the satisfaction of the patient and, thereby, of the surgeon in terms of cosmetic outcomes. Vertical incision offers superior cosmetic effects than transverse incision. Further research is required to define long-term scar-related outcomes of the laparoscopic intraperitoneal access techniques.

[1]  G. Carrougher,et al.  What score on the Vancouver Scar Scale constitutes a hypertrophic scar? Results from a survey of North American burn-care providers. , 2015, Burns.

[2]  Jean Calleja-Agius,et al.  Skin connective tissue and ageing. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[3]  Zhenjie Wu,et al.  Perioperative outcomes and cosmesis analysis of patients undergoing laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy: a comparison of transumbilical, transperitoneal subcostal, and retroperitoneal subcostal approaches. , 2013, Urology.

[4]  A. Ternamian,et al.  Laparoscopic entry: a review of Canadian general surgical practice. , 2011, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[5]  R. Sinha Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using only conventional instruments: an initial report. , 2011, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[6]  T. Nozaki,et al.  Longitudinal Incision of the Umbilicus for Laparoendoscopic Single Site Adrenalectomy: A Particular Intraumbilical Technique , 2010, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[7]  F. Tomaselli,et al.  Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) – A matched pair analysis , 2010 .

[8]  R. Pitkin,et al.  Operative laparoscopy: a second look after 18 years. , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Dohyoung Kim,et al.  Minimal-Scar Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) , 2009, Obesity surgery.

[10]  Mayank Jain,et al.  Primary access-related complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the closed technique: experience of a single surgical team over more than 15 years , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  F. Franchignoni,et al.  How to assess postsurgical scars: A review of outcome measures , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  Bishara S Atiyeh,et al.  Keloid or Hypertrophic Scar: The Controversy: Review of the Literature , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[13]  David Molloy,et al.  Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry , 2002, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[14]  P. Gentileschi,et al.  Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  L. Price,et al.  Anatomy of the left upper quadrant for cannula insertion. , 2000, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[16]  N. Kadar A new technique of primary trocar insertion for laparoscopy. , 1997, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[17]  J. Dingfelder Direct laparoscope trocar insertion without prior pneumoperitoneum. , 1978, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[18]  J. Bonnar,et al.  Abdominal Wound Dehiscence after Caesarean Section , 1971, British medical journal.