Chapter 4 – Biofouling Control

Publisher Summary Control of biofilm growth can occur due to the removal forces created by water flow across the biofilm. In addition, control can be evident through natural agencies. There are two basic methods—chemical control and physical control—and in certain situations benefits accrue from a combination of these two methods. Chemical control technology may be grouped into three broad sectors—biocides that kill microorganisms, biostats that interfere with metabolism, and surface active agents that restrict adhesion to surfaces. However, due to concern for the environment, a complication that arises is the ultimate destination of the chemical additive. An alternative to the use of chemicals for the control of biofouling relies on physical technologies. Because of the vital need to control biofouling in industrial equipment to improve operation and reduce operating cost, the problem has attracted the attention of researchers into physical techniques. An additional incentive to investigate the opportunities of physical control is the possibility of increased and stricter legislation concerning the development and use of biocides. Finally, it is desirable to monitor closely the extent of biofouling so that effective steps may be taken to prevent serious consequences occurring, such as unscheduled interruptions in production.

[1]  H. Rossmoore,et al.  Applications and mode of action of formaldehyde condensate biocides. , 1988, Advances in applied microbiology.

[2]  T. Bott,et al.  Biocide Dosing Strategies for Biofilm Control , 2005 .

[3]  Paul R. Puckorius,et al.  Ozone Use In Cooling Tower Systems – Current Guidelines – Where It Works , 1993 .

[4]  B. Little,et al.  3 – Marine Biofouling , 1988 .

[5]  A. Grill Review of the tribology of diamond-like carbon , 1993 .

[6]  K. J. Hüttinger Surface Bound Biocides — A Novel Possibility to Prevent Biofouling , 1988 .

[7]  S. Gorman,et al.  Antimicrobial activity, uses and mechanism of action of glutaraldehyde. , 1980, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[8]  M. O. Pereira,et al.  Effect of Different Concentrations of Ortho-phthalaldehyde on Biofilms Formed by Pseudomonas fluorescens Under Different Flow Conditions , 2003, Biofouling.

[9]  T. Munton,et al.  Interaction of glutaraldehyde with spheroplasts of Escherichia coli. , 1973, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[10]  M. Nimni,et al.  Mechanism of crosslinking of proteins by glutaraldehyde II. Reaction with monomeric and polymeric collagen. , 1982, Connective tissue research.

[11]  M. R. Brown,et al.  Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response , 1990, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[12]  A. D. Russell,et al.  Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance , 1999, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[13]  Liu Tianqing,et al.  Ultrasound enhancement of biocide efficiency. , 2004, Ultrasonics sonochemistry.

[14]  T. Bott The Use of Biocides in Industry , 1992 .

[15]  G. Mcdonnell Peroxygens and other forms of oxygen : Their use for effective cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization , 2007 .

[16]  T. Reg Bott,et al.  The control of biofilms in tubes using wire‐wound inserts , 2000 .

[17]  T. R. Bott Potential Physical Methods for the Control of Biofouling in Water Systems , 2001 .

[18]  T. Bott Biofouling Control with Ultrasound , 2000 .

[19]  T. Bott Ozone as a disinfectant in process plant , 1991 .

[20]  T. R. Bott,et al.  Mechanisms of biofilm formation on aluminium tubes , 2008 .

[21]  S. Denyer Mechanisms of action of biocides , 1990 .