Generating better energy indicators: Addressing the existence of multiple scales and multiple dimensions

High energy prices and the growing concern for “Peak Oil” have put energy analysis, once again, on the front burner. However, before speculating about possible roadmaps regarding our energy future, it would be wise to develop better quantitative analyses. This paper flags the existence of systemic epistemological flaws in the current use of aggregate energy indicators and presents an alternative approach capable of dealing with the issue of multiple dimensions and multiple scales. Starting from a critical appraisal of the aggregate indicator “Economic Energy Intensity” it shows that economic and biophysical variables are often correlated and that their value is determined by characteristics which can only observed across different levels and scales. Complex metabolic systems (systems that use energy to maintain and reproduce themselves) are operating simultaneously at different scales. This implies that changes in the characteristics of parts, defined at the local scale, and changes in the characteristics of the whole, defined at the large scale can only be obtained after establishing a scaling mechanism in the analysis. In order to deal with the issue of scale in energy accounting, we propose to make a distinction between three different categories: (i) primary energy sources (PES) – establishing a link between energy quantities and the associated requirement of biophysical gradients, at the large scale, on the interface black-box/context; (ii) energy carriers (EC) – defining the set of energy inputs required by technical devices for expressing useful functions, at the local scale, within the parts operating inside the black-box; (iii) end uses (EU) the set of functions to be expressed by society across hierarchical levels for reproducing itself. Finally, the paper presents examples of quantitative results obtained using an innovative method of analysis – Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism (MuSIASEM). We conclude that by using this new accounting method it is possible to generate a better understanding of external and internal constraints determining the desirability and viability of the metabolic pattern of societies.

[1]  D. Stern,et al.  Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy , 2000 .

[2]  Deirdre McCann,et al.  Working time around the world , 2007 .

[3]  Cutler J. Cleveland,et al.  Encyclopedia of Energy , 2004 .

[4]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Accounting for growth: the role of physical work , 2005 .

[5]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessments of Societal Metabolism: Integrating Biophysical and Economic Representations Across Scales , 2000 .

[6]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  The efficient use of energy: Tracing the global flow of energy from fuel to service , 2010 .

[7]  Malcolm Slesser Net energy as an energy planning tool , 1987 .

[8]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Are energy statistics useful for making energy scenarios , 2012 .

[9]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Complex Systems and Energy , 2004 .

[10]  Cutler J. Cleveland,et al.  Energy quality and energy surplus in the extraction of fossil fuels in the U.S. , 1992 .

[11]  Robert K. Kaufmann,et al.  A biophysical analysis of the energy/real GDP ratio: implications for substitution and technical change , 1992 .

[12]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900–1998 , 2003 .

[13]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society , 1972 .

[14]  James G. Speight,et al.  A review of: Odum, Howard T. “Environmental Accounting: Energy and Environmental Decision Making”. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996. $79.95. , 1996 .

[15]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  Energy at the Crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties , 2005 .

[16]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multiple-Scale Integrated Assessment of Societal Metabolism: Introducing the Approach , 2000 .

[17]  C. Hall,et al.  Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective , 1984, Science.

[18]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  Multi-scale integrated analysis of sustainability: a methodological tool to improve the quality of narratives , 2005 .

[19]  F. Cottrell,et al.  Energy and Society: The Relation Between Energy, Social Change, and Economic Development. , 1956 .

[20]  Mario Giampietro,et al.  The Metabolic Pattern of Societies: Where Economists Fall Short , 2011 .

[21]  Jordi Roca,et al.  Energy and CO2 emissions in Spain : Methodology of analysis and some results for 1980-1990 , 1995 .