Virtual and digital outcrops in the petroleum industry: A systematic review

Abstract The study of outcrop analogues of petroleum reservoirs is well established in the petroleum industry through the use of digital outcrop models (DOMs). These models, which are also known as virtual outcrop models (VOMs) or 3D outcrops, are of great importance for understanding the behavior of actual reservoirs. This topic has been reviewed by many authors, and the studies vary in detail according to the technologies involved. The present study applies systematic review methodology traversing a number of articles to find the trends in studies utilizing DOMs. The articles included in this review indicate that the technologies used to generate DOMs are still predominantly classified as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and digital photogrammetry, with the first being present in most of the works, and the latter attracting attention owing to the popularity of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). These studies have attracted a significant amount of attention to outcrop analysis, and the information acquired can be used to better fit reservoir simulations. Furthermore, a trend is identified with a focus on outcrop geometry and structural data. This work also discusses some of the available opportunities related to the generation of DOMs as well as emerging technologies that can improve the quality of the outcrop models in order to provide better reservoir simulations. Finally, this work discusses the findings and highlights of the articles answering the initially raised research questions.

[1]  Anjiang Shen,et al.  Three-dimensional carbonate reservoir geomodeling based on the digital outcrop model , 2015 .

[2]  V. Vandeginste,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of diagenetic geobodies for geological carbon dioxide storage , 2015 .

[3]  G. Christodoulides,et al.  Gamma-ray measurements of naturally occurring radioactive samples from cyprus characteristic geological rocks , 2002, physics/0212099.

[4]  Stephen E. Laubach,et al.  A scale-independent approach to fracture intensity and average spacing measurement , 2006 .

[5]  Barbara A. Kitchenham.  Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Literature Reviews , 2006, PROFES.

[6]  Jorge Gomes,et al.  Integrated Workflow For Building 3d Digital Outcrop Models Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - Drones: Field Case Thamama Group, Wadih Rahbah, UAE. , 2017 .

[7]  R. Haszeldine,et al.  The physical characteristics of a CO2 seeping fault: the implications of fracture permeability for carbon capture and storage integrity , 2017 .

[8]  Craig Glennie,et al.  Thin-bedded reservoir analogs in an ancient delta using terrestrial laser scanner and high-resolution ground-based hyperspectral cameras , 2016 .

[9]  I. Lecomte,et al.  Synthetic seismic illumination of small-scale growth faults, paralic deposits and low-angle clinoforms: A case study of the Triassic successions on Edgeøya, NW Barents Shelf , 2016 .

[10]  Lei Sun,et al.  Ground-based hyperspectral imaging and terrestrial laser scanning for fracture characterization in the Mississippian Boone Formation , 2017, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[11]  Tuanfeng Zhang,et al.  MPS-Driven Digital Rock Modeling and Upscaling , 2015, Mathematical Geosciences.

[12]  David Healy,et al.  Calibration and validation of reservoir models: the importance of high resolution, quantitative outcrop analogues , 2008 .

[13]  E. Ramos,et al.  Unlocking the correlation in fluvial outcrops by using a DOM-derived virtual datum: Method description and field tests in the Huesca fluvial fan, Ebro Basin (Spain) , 2015 .

[14]  John A. Howell,et al.  Distribution of discontinuous mudstone beds within wave-dominated shallow-marine deposits: Star Point Sandstone and Blackhawk Formation, Eastern Utah , 2014 .

[15]  Craig Glennie,et al.  Review of Earth science research using terrestrial laser scanning , 2017 .

[16]  David Hodgetts,et al.  Applications of digital outcrop models: two fluvial case studies from the Triassic Wolfville Fm., Canada and Oukaimeden Sandstone Fm., Morocco , 2009 .

[17]  Shuhab D. Khan,et al.  Study of Upper Albian rudist buildups in the Edwards Formation using ground-based hyperspectral imaging and terrestrial laser scanning , 2016 .

[18]  I. Lecomte,et al.  Seismic interpretation of sill complexes in sedimentary basins: implications for the sub-sill imaging problem , 2017, Journal of the Geological Society.

[19]  Shuhab D. Khan,et al.  Quantitative characterization of a naturally fractured reservoir analog using a hybrid lidar-gigapixel imaging approach , 2018 .

[20]  T. Aigner,et al.  NEAR WELL‐SCALE HETEROGENEITIES IN A KHUFF OUTCROP EQUIVALENT (SAIQ PLATEAU, AL JABAL AL AKHDAR, SULTANATE OF OMAN) , 2011 .

[21]  J. Pringle,et al.  Application of photogrammetry to generate quantitative geobody data in ephemeral fluvial systems , 2019, The Photogrammetric Record.

[22]  Stefano Tavani,et al.  Open Plot Project: an open-source toolkit for 3-D structural data analysis , 2010 .

[23]  Hiranya Sahoo,et al.  Creating three-dimensional channel bodies in LiDAR-integrated outcrop characterization: A new approach for improved stratigraphic analysis , 2015 .

[24]  D. Hodgetts,et al.  Quantifying spatial and architectural relationships from fluvial outcrops , 2019, Geosphere.

[25]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[26]  Qinglu Zeng,et al.  LIDAR-based fracture characterization and controlling factors analysis: An outcrop case from Kuqa Depression, NW China ☆ , 2018 .

[27]  Carlos Roberto de Souza Filho,et al.  A review on spectral processing methods for geological remote sensing , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[28]  O. Abdullatif,et al.  Workflow of integration of digital outcrop modeling and sedimentology of the Early Triassic Upper Khartam Member of Khuff Formation, central Saudi Arabia , 2017, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[29]  S. Buckley,et al.  Quantifying clinothem geometry in a forced‐regressive river‐dominated delta, Panther Tongue Member, Utah, USA , 2010 .

[30]  M. Mutti,et al.  From ramp to platform: building a 3D model of depositional geometries and facies architectures in transitional carbonates in the Miocene, northern Sardinia , 2010 .

[31]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison , 2015, Scientometrics.

[32]  Caroline Lessio Cazarin,et al.  A Multioutcrop Sharing and Interpretation System: Exploring 3-D Surface and Subsurface Data , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[33]  John A. Howell,et al.  The application of outcrop analogues in geological modelling: a review, present status and future outlook , 2014 .

[34]  Samuel T. Thiele,et al.  Review of drones, photogrammetry and emerging sensor technology for the study of dykes: Best practises and future potential , 2019, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.

[35]  David Hodgetts,et al.  A new approach for outcrop characterization and geostatistical analysis of a low-sinuosity fluvial-dominated succession using digital outcrop models: Upper Triassic Oukaimeden Sandstone Formation, central High Atlas, Morocco , 2009 .

[36]  S. Buckley,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanning in geology: data acquisition, processing and accuracy considerations , 2008, Journal of the Geological Society.

[37]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Virtual outcrop models of petroleum reservoir analogues: a review of the current state-of-the-art , 2006 .

[38]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[39]  A. Nicol,et al.  Quantitative geometric description of fracture systems in an andesite lava flow using terrestrial laser scanner data , 2017, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.

[40]  T. Seers,et al.  Comparison of digital outcrop and conventional data collection approaches for the characterization of naturally fractured reservoir analogues , 2013 .

[41]  Richard R. Jones,et al.  Characterization of fluvial architectural elements using a three-dimensional outcrop data set: Escanilla braided system, South-Central Pyrenees, Spain , 2007 .

[42]  Margot Gerritsen,et al.  MODELING FLUID FLOW IN OIL RESERVOIRS , 2005 .

[43]  Danilo Schneider,et al.  Terrestrial lidar and hyperspectral data fusion products for geological outcrop analysis , 2013, Comput. Geosci..

[44]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[45]  Jan C. Rivenæs,et al.  Introduction to Reservoir Modelling , 2015 .

[46]  Angela Boland,et al.  Doing a Systematic Review. A Student's Guide. Third Edition , 2023, Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique.

[47]  David Hodgetts,et al.  Integrating Digital and Traditional Field Techniques Using Virtual Reality Geological Studio (VRGS) , 2007 .

[48]  B. Koehrer,et al.  Comparing fracture statistics from outcrop and reservoir data using conventional manual and t-LiDAR derived scanlines in Ca2 carbonates from the Southern Permian Basin, Germany , 2018, Marine and Petroleum Geology.

[49]  David Hodgetts,et al.  Laser scanning and digital outcrop geology in the petroleum industry: A review , 2013 .

[50]  Charles Kerans,et al.  Three-dimensional geological and synthetic seismic model of Early Permian redeposited basinal carbonate deposits, Victorio Canyon, west Texas , 2007 .

[51]  J. Gale,et al.  Quantifying aperture, spacing and fracture intensity in a carbonate reservoir analogue: Crato Formation, NE Brazil , 2018, Marine and Petroleum Geology.

[52]  R. Gawthorpe,et al.  LiDAR-based digital outcrops for sedimentological analysis: workflows and techniques , 2013 .

[53]  J. Howell,et al.  Three-dimensional characterisation of sedimentary heterogeneity and its impact on subsurface flow behaviour through the braided-to-meandering fluvial deposits of the Castissent Formation (late Ypresian, Tremp-Graus Basin, Spain) , 2019, Marine and Petroleum Geology.

[54]  M. Ramkumar,et al.  High resolution facies architecture and digital outcrop modeling of the Sandakan formation sandstone reservoir, Borneo: Implications for reservoir characterization and flow simulation , 2019, Geoscience Frontiers.

[55]  John A. Howell,et al.  From outcrop to reservoir simulation model: Workflow and procedures , 2007 .

[56]  C. Kerans,et al.  Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling , 2005 .

[57]  Thomas K. Rockwell,et al.  Automated Classification and Correlation of Drill Cores using High-Resolution Hyperspectral Images and Supervised Pattern Classification Algorithms. Applications to Paleoseismology , 2006 .

[58]  J. A. Howell,et al.  Three-dimensional geological models from outcrop data using digital data collection techniques: an example from the Tanqua Karoo depocentre, South Africa , 2005, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[59]  J. Howell,et al.  Impact of deltaic clinothems on reservoir performance: Dynamic studies of reservoir analogs from the Ferron Sandstone Member and Panther Tongue, Utah , 2010 .

[60]  Kimberly R Powell,et al.  Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics. , 2017, Nursing outlook.

[61]  John A. Howell,et al.  LIME: Software for 3-D visualization, interpretation, and communication of virtual geoscience models , 2019, Geosphere.

[62]  Luo Wenzhong,et al.  Fracture Patterns and Controlling Factors using LIDAR: An Outcrop Case Study of Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, NW China , 2016 .

[63]  L. Zou,et al.  Historical shear deformation of rock fractures derived from quantitative three-dimensional description of fracture surfaces on digital outcrop models (DOMs) , 2018 .

[64]  Christian Carlsson,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanning for use in Virtual Outcrop Geology , 2010 .

[65]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[66]  I. Lecomte,et al.  From field analogues to realistic seismic modelling: a case study of an oil-producing andesitic sill complex in the Neuquén Basin, Argentina , 2018, Journal of the Geological Society.

[67]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Virtual Outcrops: 3-D reservoir analogues , 2001 .

[68]  M. Huysmans,et al.  Multi-scale three-dimensional distribution of fracture- and igneous intrusion-controlled hydrothermal dolomite from digital outcrop model, Latemar platform, Dolomites, northern Italy , 2015 .

[69]  M. Hariri,et al.  Analysis of lineaments within the Wajid Group, SW Saudi Arabia, and their tectonic significance , 2017, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[70]  Xueming Xu,et al.  Digital Geologic Mapping of the Ferron Sandstone, Muddy Creek, Utah, with GPS and Reflectorless Laser Rangefinders , 2001, GPS Solutions.

[71]  P. Arbués,et al.  From conventional outcrop datasets and digital outcrop models to flow simulation in the Pont de Montanyana point-bar deposits (Ypresian, Southern Pyrenees) , 2018, Marine and Petroleum Geology.

[72]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review , 2003 .

[73]  L. Tomassetti,et al.  Modeling lateral facies heterogeneity of an upper Oligocene carbonate ramp (Salento, southern Italy) , 2018, Marine and Petroleum Geology.

[74]  Gillian Elizabeth Pickup,et al.  The Development of Appropriate Upscaling Procedures , 2000 .

[75]  John A. Howell,et al.  Overlapping faults and their effect on fluid flow in different reservoir types: A LIDAR-based outcrop modeling and flow simulation study , 2009 .

[76]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering , 2006, ICSE.

[77]  A. Pignalosa,et al.  Distribution and arrest of vertical through-going joints in a seismic-scale carbonate platform exposure (Sorrento peninsula, Italy): insights from integrating field survey and digital outcrop model , 2017 .