Functioning of alcohol use disorder criteria among men and women with arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol.

BACKGROUND Many states require screening of individuals arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol to determine recidivism risk and the need for treatment based on severity of alcohol problems. Several screening instruments use DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse and dependence to assess alcohol problems in this population, but whether they adequately measure alcohol problems in individuals with DUIs has not been examined. In addition, gender differences in DUI samples suggest that female offenders have more severe alcohol problems than male offenders. The current study examines differences in alcohol criteria functioning by DUI history and gender using an item response theory (IRT) approach. METHODS Data from diagnostic interviews with 8,605 participants in the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism, including 1,655 who ever reported a DUI arrest (20% women), were used to examine differences in alcohol criteria functioning between men and women with and without DUIs. The factor underlying item response was conceptualized as unidimensional, representing alcohol problem severity. RESULTS Social/interpersonal problems, larger/longer, and inability/persistent desire to quit displayed greater discrimination of IRT-defined alcohol problem severity among individuals with DUIs than those without. Irrespective of DUI status, women had a higher threshold than men for time spent drinking or recovering. Women without DUIs had a higher threshold than similar men for social/interpersonal problems. Taken as a whole, the criteria yielded similar amounts of information in all groups. CONCLUSIONS DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse and dependence adequately detect alcohol problem severity in individuals with DUIs, and some are better at detecting severity in this particularly high-risk group than in individuals without DUIs. However, the criteria as a whole are equally effective in measuring alcohol problem severity among individuals with and without DUIs and may be used with confidence in screening DUI offenders.

[1]  Janet B W Williams,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[2]  K. Tessner,et al.  Psychopathology in offspring from families of alcohol dependent female probands: a prospective study. , 2011, Journal of psychiatric research.

[3]  S. Lapham,et al.  Does screening classification predict long-term outcomes of DWI offenders? , 2010, American journal of health behavior.

[4]  Richard A. Brown,et al.  Assessing the severity of hazardous drinking and related consequences among incarcerated women. , 2010, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[5]  M. Rubio‐Stipec,et al.  The dimensionality of alcohol use disorders and alcohol consumption in a cross-national perspective. , 2010, Addiction.

[6]  T. Harford,et al.  The dimensionality of DSM-IV alcohol use disorders among adolescent and adult drinkers and symptom patterns by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. , 2009, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[7]  R. Brooner,et al.  An item response theory modeling of alcohol and marijuana dependences: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study. , 2009, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[8]  L. Bierut,et al.  Alcohol criteria endorsement and psychiatric and drug use disorders among DUI offenders: greater severity among women and multiple offenders. , 2009, Addictive behaviors.

[9]  J. Hewitt,et al.  Toward DSM-V: an item response theory analysis of the diagnostic process for DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in adolescents. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[10]  Richard A LaBrie,et al.  Substance and psychiatric disorders among men and women repeat driving under the influence offenders who accept a treatment-sentencing option. , 2008, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[11]  Debi A. LaPlante,et al.  The epidemiology of psychiatric disorders among repeat DUI offenders accepting a treatment-sentencing option. , 2007, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  B. Grant,et al.  The role of alcohol consumption in future classifications of alcohol use disorders. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[13]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Does gender contribute to heterogeneity in criteria for cannabis abuse and dependence? Results from the national epidemiological survey on alcohol and related conditions. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[14]  R. Krueger,et al.  Investigating gender differences in alcohol problems: a latent trait modeling approach. , 2007, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[15]  D. Thissen,et al.  Using effect sizes for research reporting: examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning. , 2006, Psychological methods.

[16]  S. Lapham,et al.  Psychiatric disorders in a sample of repeat impaired-driving offenders. , 2006, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[17]  B. Grant,et al.  Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions , 2006, Psychological Medicine.

[18]  C. Kahler,et al.  A Rasch model analysis of DSM-IV Alcohol abuse and dependence items in the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. , 2006, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[19]  B. Grant,et al.  Estimating the effect of help-seeking on achieving recovery from alcohol dependence. , 2006, Addiction.

[20]  S. Lapham,et al.  Accuracy of alcohol diagnosis among DWI offenders referred for screening. , 2004, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[21]  Li-Tzy Wu,et al.  Alcohol dependence and use of treatment services among women in the community. , 2004, The American journal of psychiatry.

[22]  Todd M. Moore,et al.  Item functioning of the alcohol dependence scale in a high-risk sample. , 2003, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[23]  S C Lapham,et al.  REVIEW OF SCREENING INSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING DWI [DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED/IMPAIRED] OFFENDERS , 2002 .

[24]  M. Olfson,et al.  Perceived need and help-seeking in adults with mood, anxiety, or substance use disorders. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[25]  S. Lapham,et al.  Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among persons convicted of driving while impaired. , 2001, Archives of general psychiatry.

[26]  Daniel L. Koller,et al.  Alcoholism susceptibility loci: confirmation studies in a replicate sample and further mapping. , 2000, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[27]  M. Hesselbrock,et al.  A validity study of the SSAGA--a comparison with the SCAN. , 1999, Addiction.

[28]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[29]  M. Hesselbrock,et al.  The clinical course of alcohol-related problems in alcohol dependent and nonalcohol dependent drinking women and men. , 1998, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[30]  J. Rice,et al.  Genome-wide search for genes affecting the risk for alcohol dependence. , 1998, American journal of medical genetics.

[31]  T Reich,et al.  Can we subtype alcoholism? A latent class analysis of data from relatives of alcoholics in a multicenter family study of alcoholism. , 1996, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[32]  J. Nurnberger,et al.  Reliability of individual diagnostic criterion items for psychoactive substance dependence and the impact on diagnosis. , 1995, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[33]  S. Lapham,et al.  Alcohol abuse screening instruments: normative test data collected from a first DWI offender screening program. , 1995, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[34]  G. J. Mellenbergh,et al.  Generalized linear item response theory. , 1994 .

[35]  J. Nurnberger,et al.  A new, semi-structured psychiatric interview for use in genetic linkage studies: a report on the reliability of the SSAGA. , 1994, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[36]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Multiple Group IRT Modeling: Applications to Item Bias Analysis , 1985 .

[37]  J. Feighner,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. , 1972, Archives of general psychiatry.