Accuracy of femur reconstruction from sparse geometric data using a statistical shape model

Abstract Sparse geometric information from limited field-of-view medical images is often used to reconstruct the femur in biomechanical models of the hip and knee. However, the full femur geometry is needed to establish boundary conditions such as muscle attachment sites and joint axes which define the orientation of joint loads. Statistical shape models have been used to estimate the geometry of the full femur from varying amounts of sparse geometric information. However, the effect that different amounts of sparse data have on reconstruction accuracy has not been systematically assessed. In this study, we compared shape model and linear scaling reconstruction of the full femur surface from varying proportions of proximal and distal partial femur geometry in combination with morphometric and landmark data. We quantified reconstruction error in terms of surface-to-surface error as well as deviations in the reconstructed femur’s anatomical coordinate system which is important for biomechanical models. Using a partial proximal femur surface, mean shape model-based reconstruction surface error was 1.8 mm with 0.15° or less anatomic axis error, compared to 19.1 mm and 2.7–5.6° for linear scaling. Similar results were found when using a partial distal surface. However, varying amounts of proximal or distal partial surface data had a negligible effect on reconstruction accuracy. Our results show that given an appropriate set of sparse geometric data, a shape model can reconstruct full femur geometry with far greater accuracy than simple scaling.

[1]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[2]  Marleen de Bruijne,et al.  2D-3D shape reconstruction of the distal femur from stereo X-ray imaging using statistical shape models , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Massimo Sartori,et al.  Subject-specific knee joint geometry improves predictions of medial tibiofemoral contact forces. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  L. Joskowicz,et al.  Gradient-based 2-D/3-D rigid registration of fluoroscopic X-ray to CT , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Prasanth B. Nair,et al.  Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  Ju Zhang,et al.  An anatomical region-based statistical shape model of the human femur , 2014, Comput. methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis..

[10]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  A Statistical Model of Shape and Bone Mineral Density Distribution of the Proximal Femur for Fracture Risk Assessment , 2011, MICCAI.

[11]  Thor F Besier,et al.  Predictive statistical models of baseline variations in 3-D femoral cortex morphology. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  Stéphane Lavallée,et al.  Incorporating a statistically based shape model into a system for computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament surgery , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Prasanth B. Nair,et al.  Use of a statistical model of the whole femur in a large scale, multi-model study of femoral neck fracture risk. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  A statistical finite element model of the knee accounting for shape and alignment variability. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  F.E. Zajac,et al.  An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann,et al.  Robust statistical shape models for MRI bone segmentation in presence of small field of view , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Pelvic Bones from CT Data Based on a Statistical Shape Model , 2008, VCBM.

[20]  Poul M. F. Nielsen,et al.  Automatic Meshing of Femur Cortical Surfaces from Clinical CT Images , 2012, MeshMed.

[21]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the bone and extraction of the bone–cartilage interface from magnetic resonance images of the knee , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  Statistical deformable bone models for robust 3D surface extrapolation from sparse data , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[23]  John Rasmussen,et al.  Scaling of musculoskeletal models from static and dynamic trials , 2015 .

[24]  Guoyan Zheng,et al.  A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  H F J M Koopman,et al.  Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  Ayman Habib,et al.  OpenSim: Open-Source Software to Create and Analyze Dynamic Simulations of Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.