Optimizing Performance of Manufacturing Systems by Evaluating Performance Effectiveness Function

Managing change in manufacturing companies is complex. This complexity tends to increase when organisations overstretch improvement targets above their current ability to apply adequate effort to succeed. This paper describes a performance effectiveness function that estimates performance gain that is achievable levels of effort required to apply to the improvement project. The performance effectiveness function maps the often non-linear relationship between actual performance gain and applied effort. The outcome when applying the function may be used by organisations to set realistic performance gain targets with a better chance of success and to have realistic expectations on the level of performance they may achieve from an improvement project.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[2]  Abid Haleem,et al.  Implementing lean manufacturing system: ISM approach , 2013 .

[3]  Osamu Mizuno,et al.  Estimation of project success using Bayesian classifier , 2006, ICSE '06.

[4]  Tim Baines,et al.  Developing and evaluating a methodology for business process improvement , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[5]  Markus Kohlbacher,et al.  Process ownership, process performance measurement and firm performance , 2011 .

[6]  J. Antony,et al.  Gearing Six Sigma into UK manufacturing SMEs: results from a pilot study , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[7]  John H. Blackstone,et al.  The evolution of a management philosophy: The theory of constraints , 2007 .

[8]  Alfredo Candia-Véjar,et al.  The optimization of success probability for software projects using genetic algorithms , 2011, J. Syst. Softw..

[9]  Paul J. Componation,et al.  Identification of Effective Problem-Solving Tools to Support Continuous Process Improvement Teams , 2000 .

[10]  T. Saaty Relative measurement and its generalization in decision making why pairwise comparisons are central in mathematics for the measurement of intangible factors the analytic hierarchy/network process , 2008 .

[11]  C. Tennant,et al.  Selection of six sigma projects in the UK , 2006 .

[12]  Satya S. Chakravorty,et al.  Prioritizing Improvement Projects: Benefit & Effort (B&E) Analysis , 2012 .

[13]  J. Davis,et al.  Determining a Project's Probability of Success , 2001 .

[14]  Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes,et al.  An integrated methodology to prioritise improvement initiatives in low volume-high integrity product manufacturing organisations , 2013 .