Does the limited use of orthogonal signal correction pre-treatment approach to improve the prediction accuracy of soil organic carbon need attention?

Abstract Visible-Near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy is a relatively modern method that can be used to predict soil properties such as soil organic carbon (SOC). Predictions of soil properties with Vis-NIR requires pre-processing algorithms. Applying a wrong type or applying too extreme pre-processing algorithms may result in the removal of valuable information or may even introduce unwanted variations. This can negatively affect the prediction accuracy of the property being studied. Orthogonal signal correction (OSC) pre-processing method has been used in other fields for visible and near infrared spectra improvement. However, the application of OSC application in soil science remains limited. The main idea behind OSC is the removal of only unwanted variation from the spectrum unlike some other pre-treatment methods which are believed to remove valuable information in the process of removing undesirable variation. This study verifies the effectiveness of the OSC against nine commonly used pre-treatment methods across three different agricultural fields for both lab-dry and in-field spectra. For the prediction, partial least square regression (PLSR) and support vector machine regression (SVMR) algorithms were used. In this study, the OSC method overall improved prediction accuracy the most (e.g. with OSC the best result was R2CV = 0.79, without OSC the best result was R2CV = 0.62) and is therefore a promising tool that should be included in further studies on different soils and other soil properties.

[1]  Craig F. Drury,et al.  Predicting soil organic carbon and total nitrogen using mid- and near-infrared spectra for Brookston clay loam soil in Southwestern Ontario, Canada , 2011, Canadian Journal of Soil Science.

[2]  Simon J. Hook,et al.  Investigating the effects of soil moisture on thermal infrared land surface temperature and emissivity using satellite retrievals and laboratory measurements , 2010 .

[3]  Cindy Ong,et al.  Reflectance measurements of soils in the laboratory: Standards and protocols , 2015 .

[4]  Lubos Boruvka,et al.  Comparison of Field and Laboratory Wet Soil Spectra in the Vis-NIR Range for Soil Organic Carbon Prediction in the Absence of Laboratory Dry Measurements , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[5]  R. Kodešová,et al.  Simple but efficient signal pre-processing in soil organic carbon spectroscopic estimation , 2017 .

[6]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  LOF: identifying density-based local outliers , 2000, SIGMOD '00.

[7]  S. Wold,et al.  Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O‐PLS) , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas A. Blake,et al.  Application of extended inverse scatter correction to mid‐infrared reflectance spectra of soil , 2005 .

[9]  Eyal Ben-Dor,et al.  Internal soil standard method for the Brazilian soil spectral library: Performance and proximate analysis , 2018 .

[10]  S. Wold,et al.  Orthogonal signal correction of near-infrared spectra , 1998 .

[11]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  LOF: identifying density-based local outliers , 2000, SIGMOD 2000.

[12]  Frans van den Berg,et al.  Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra , 2009 .

[13]  Lutgarde M. C. Buydens,et al.  Breaking with trends in pre-processing? , 2013 .

[14]  R. Sanderson,et al.  The Link between Multiplicative Scatter Correction (MSC) and Standard Normal Variate (SNV) Transformations of NIR Spectra , 1994 .

[15]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  The Role of Spatial Variability in Coal Seam Parameters on Gas Outburst Behaviour During Coal Mining , 2008 .

[16]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  Loopy MSC: A Simple Way to Improve Multiplicative Scatter Correction , 2008, Applied spectroscopy.