Teat Condition in Dairy Cows

De spenen van melkkoeien zijn de eerstelijns afweer tegen mastitis veroorzakende bacterien. Het melken kan de speenconditie aantasten. Het is bewezen dat ernstige speenpunt-beschadigingen lijden tot meer mastitis. Maar de meer algemeen voorkomende veranderingen in de conditie van de speen door het melken zijn niet gerelateerd aan uiergezondheidsproblemen. Dit proefschrift was gericht op het verband tussen speenconditie, melken en het optreden van mastitis. In dit werk zijn 2 typen van speenconditie-veranderingen bekeken: speenpuntvereelting en zwelling van spenen door het melkenThe dairy cow's teat is the first line of defence against mastitis pathogens. The milking process may affect the teat's condition, increasing the risk of mastitis. It is well-proven that teat-ends with severe erosions or broken skin will have an increased risk of mastitis. However, more common changes in teat condition because of milking have not been related to udder health problems. The focus of this thesis was on the relationship between teat-end condition, machine milking and occurrence of mastitis. In this thesis, two types of changes of teat-end condition were distinguished: callosity rings around the orifice and machine-induced teat swelling. A classification system of the callosity rings around the orifice was defined: the teat-end callosity (TEC) classification system. In this system, a distinction is made between roughness of the callosity ring (TECR) and thickness of the callosity ring (TECT). The developed TEC classification system was used in a 1½ year longitudinal field study on 15 farms to examine the relationship between TEC and the incidence of clinical mastitis. Teats with a thin and smooth TEC ring showed the lowest incidence risk of clinical mastitis. To evaluate TEC in the field, a simplified 4-category scoring system is suggested and used in an observational study on 200 dairy farms. Variation in %ROUGH between farms is explained by cow factors such as teat-end shape and machine-on time and milking machine factors such as the liner and the vacuum. In order to measure machine-induced teat swelling, a methodology, using ultrasound, has been developed. Using this method, the changes of teat tissue in relation to machine milking and the recovery time of teat tissue after milking were evaluated. 8 h after milking, the teat-end width and the teat-canal length still differed from before milking. The teat-wall thickness and the teat-cistern width were recovered after 6 and 8 h. The overall conclusion of this thesis is that a healthy teat of a dairy cow has a good balance between the physiological reaction to machine milking and maintaining its first line of defence mechanism against invading mastitis pathogens. Increasing rates of IMI were related to one or more of the following: a high degree of machine-induced swelling, a high level of TECT, a high level of TECR and the absence of TEC. Pathways through which these machine-induced changes lowered the resistance of the teat to bacterial invasion are the openness of the teat canal, harbouring of pathogens in TEC, and significantly increased or decreased level of keratin regeneration rate. Part of the impaired reaction of the teat to machine milking may lay in the peak milkflow rate. Suggestions are made to adjust the characteristics of machine milking to the milk flow profile of an individual cow. This can minimise machine-induced teat condition problems. Teat condition changes can be used as an early warning signal for enhanced risk of clinical mastitis. Classification of teat condition is an essential tool in milking machine research and a useful monitoring tool of the quality of milking in the field. Protocols for systematic evaluation of teat condition are available

[1]  M. Auldist,et al.  Effects of mastitis on raw milk and dairy products , 1998 .

[2]  P C Bartlett,et al.  Costs of clinical mastitis and mastitis prevention in dairy herds. , 1993, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[3]  P. Ruegg,et al.  The relationship between antibiotic residue violations and somatic cell counts in Wisconsin dairy herds. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  L. Green,et al.  Risk factors associated with clinical mastitis in low somatic cell count British dairy herds. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  Mcdonald Js Radiographic method for anatomic study of the teat canal: changes with lactation age. , 1968 .

[6]  P. Huijsmans,et al.  The Dutch quality system for milking machine maintenance in 2003 and 2004 , 2001 .

[7]  B. Poutrel Susceptibility to mastitis: a review of factors related to the cow. , 1982, Annales de recherches veterinaires. Annals of veterinary research.

[8]  Mcdonald Js Radiographic method for anatomic study of the teat canal: changes between milking periods. , 1975 .

[9]  J. O'shea Machine milking factors affecting mastitis. A literature review , 1987 .

[10]  H N Erb,et al.  Design and validation of a dynamic discrete event stochastic simulation model of mastitis control in dairy herds. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  J. Hamann,et al.  Measurement of machine-induced changes in thickness of the bovine teat , 1990, Journal of Dairy Research.

[12]  F. Neijenhuis,et al.  EVALUATION OF BOVINE TEAT CONDITION IN COMMERCIAL DAIRY HERDS: 1. NON-INFECTIOUS FACTORS , 2001 .

[13]  N. E. Jensen,et al.  The dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infection in nine Danish dairy herds. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.

[14]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[15]  L. O. Ely,et al.  Effect of region, herd size, and milk production on reasons cows leave the herd. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  Schalm Ow,et al.  A radiographic study of the effects of mechanical milking and machine vaccum on the teat structures of the bovine mammary gland. , 1956 .

[17]  R. Bruckmaier Milk ejection during machine milking in dairy cows , 2001 .

[18]  D. Wilson,et al.  Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and Pennsylvania: prevalence and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  P. Moroni,et al.  Field study on the relationship between teat thickness changes and intramammary infections , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.

[20]  P. Cockcroft,et al.  The likelihood of subclinical mastitis in quarters with different types of teat lesions in the dairy cow. , 2000 .

[21]  O. Osterås,et al.  Field studies show associations between pulsator characteristics and udder health , 1995, Journal of Dairy Research.

[22]  S. Waage,et al.  Clinical bovine mastitis in Norway. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  G. A. Mein,et al.  Mechanics of the teat and teatcup liner during milking: information from radiographs , 1973, Journal of Dairy Research.

[24]  L B Hansen,et al.  Heritabilities of teat end shape and teat diameter and their relationships with somatic cell score. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  C. C. Thiel,et al.  Compressive load applied by the teatcup liner to the bovine teat , 1987, Journal of Dairy Research.

[26]  G. Bakken Relationships between Udder and Teat Morphology, Mastitis and Milk Production in Norwegian Red Cattle , 1981 .

[27]  H. Barkema,et al.  Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  G. Mein,et al.  The bovine teat canal: information from measurement of velocity of milk flow from the teat , 1986, Journal of Dairy Research.

[29]  P. Moroni,et al.  Relationship between teat tissue immune defences and intramammary infections. , 2000, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[30]  Bara Vinković,et al.  ENVIRONMENT AND ANIMAL HEALTH , 2001 .

[31]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Milking interval, milk production and milk flow-rate in an automatic milking system , 2001 .

[32]  R. Farnsworth Observations on Teat Lesions , 1995 .

[33]  M. Rasmussen Influence of switch level of automatic cluster removers on milking performance and udder health , 1993, Journal of Dairy Research.

[34]  E. R. Jackson An outbreak of teat sores in a commercial dairy herd possibly associated with milking machine faults , 1970, Veterinary Record.

[35]  A. Henken,et al.  Multivariate epidemiological approach to coccidiosis in broilers. , 1992, Poultry science.

[36]  J. Hillers,et al.  Effect of teat-end shape on milking rate and udder health. , 1980 .

[37]  M. Nielen,et al.  Low somatic cell count: a risk factor for subsequent clinical mastitis in a dairy herd. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  A. Rathore Teat shape and production associated with opening and prolapse of the teat orifice in Friesian cows. , 1977, The British veterinary journal.

[39]  C. Cannon,et al.  The Anatomy and Physiology of the Teat Sphincter , 1942 .

[40]  E. V. Caruolo,et al.  Ultrasonograms of Lactating Mammary Glands , 1967 .

[41]  P. Bartlett,et al.  Milk production and somatic cell count in Michigan dairy herds. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  S. Spencer,et al.  Relationship among udder and teat morphology and milking characteristics. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[43]  Lacy-Hulbert Sj,et al.  Physical characteristics of the bovine teat canal and their influence on susceptibility to streptococcal infection. , 1995 .

[44]  D. Boichard,et al.  Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits, and milking ease in first lactation Holsteins. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[45]  R. J. Grindal,et al.  Influence of milk flow rate and streak canal length on new intramammary infection in dairy cows , 1991, Journal of Dairy Research.

[46]  Sue J. Welham,et al.  Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual , 1994 .

[47]  Schultze Wd,et al.  Changes in penetrability of bovine papillary duct to endotoxin after milking. , 1983 .

[48]  G. Rogers,et al.  Heritability of intramammary infections at first parturition and relationships with sire transmitting abilities for somatic cell score, udder type traits, productive life, and protein yield. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[49]  M. Rasmussen,et al.  Effects of milkline vacuum, pulsator airline vacuum, and cluster weight on milk yield, teat condition, and udder health. , 2000, Journal of Dairy Science.

[50]  F. Neijenhuis,et al.  Teat condition and mastitis , 2004 .

[51]  D. Gleeson,et al.  Effect of machine milking on bovine teat sinus injury and teat canal keratin , 2003 .

[52]  F. H. Dodd Mastitis--progress on control. , 1983, Journal of dairy science.

[53]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Milk flow patterns at the end of milking at the whole udder or quarter levels: relationship to somatic cell counts , 2002 .

[54]  F. Neijenhuis,et al.  EVALUATION OF BOVINE TEAT CONDITION IN COMMERCIAL DAIRY HERDS: 3. GETTING THE NUMBERS RIGHT , 2001 .

[55]  R. Miller,et al.  Influence of pulsationless milking on teat canal keratin and mastitis. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[56]  F. Neijenhuis,et al.  EVALUATION OF BOVINE TEAT CONDITION IN COMMERCIAL DAIRY HERDS: 2. INFECTIOUS FACTORS AND INFECTIONS , 2001 .

[57]  L. Green,et al.  Study of clinical mastitis in British dairy herds with bulk milk somatic cell counts less than 150,000 cells/ml , 2002, Veterinary Record.

[58]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Effects of α- and β-adrenergic receptor stimulation and oxytocin receptor blockade on milking characteristics in dairy cows before and after removal of the teat sphincter , 2003 .

[59]  F. H. Dodd,et al.  Mastitis control and herd management. , 1981 .

[60]  E. Rothenanger Association and dissociation of single quarter and total milk flow in dairy cows: effects of milking with and without pre-stimulation , 1995 .

[61]  P. D. Wood,et al.  The biometry of lactation , 1977, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[62]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Maximising the milking capacity of an automatic milking system. , 2000 .

[63]  M. Rasmussen,et al.  Pressure in the teat cistern and the mouth of the calf during suckling , 1998, Journal of Dairy Research.

[64]  K. Smith Mastitis control: a discussion. , 1983, Journal of Dairy Science.

[65]  B. Mcdaniel,et al.  Heritabilities of Teat Traits and their Relationships with Milk Yield, Somatic Cell Count, and Percent Two-Minute Milk , 1985 .

[66]  A. Bramley,et al.  Effect of milking without pulsation on teat duct colonization with Streptococcus agalactiae and penetrability to endotoxin. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[67]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Interruption of machine milking in dairy cows: effects on intramammary pressure and milking characteristics , 1995, Journal of Dairy Research.

[68]  G. Mein,et al.  Biological responses of the bovine teat to milking: information from measurements of milk flow-rate within single pulsation cycles , 1981, Journal of Dairy Research.

[69]  Y. Schukken,et al.  Incidence of clinical mastitis in a random sample of dairy herds in the southern Netherlands , 1996, Veterinary Record.

[70]  H. Seegers,et al.  Risk of clinical mastitis in dairy herds with a high proportion of low individual milk somatic-cell counts. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[71]  W. Klee,et al.  The relationship between milk yield and the incidence of some diseases in dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[72]  J. W. Pankey,et al.  Premilking udder hygiene. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.

[73]  F. Degraves,et al.  Economics of mastitis and mastitis control. , 1993, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[74]  S. Oliver,et al.  Prevalence of mastitis pathogens in herds participating in a mastitis control program. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.

[75]  J. Dearing,et al.  Effects of automatic milking on body condition score and fertility of dairy cows. , 2004 .

[76]  R. J. Grindal,et al.  Effect of duration of teat cup liner closure per pulsation cycle on bovine mastitis. , 1981, Journal of dairy science.

[77]  H. Erb,et al.  Risk factors for clinical mastitis in herds with a low bulk milk somatic cell count. 1. Data and risk factors for all cases. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[78]  D. Shuster,et al.  Factors affecting milk somatic cells and their role in health of the bovine mammary gland. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[79]  H N Erb,et al.  Partial budget of the discounted annual benefit of mastitis control strategies. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[80]  W. Howard,et al.  Economics of mastitis control. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[81]  A. Ibrahim,et al.  B-mode ultrasonography of the bovine udder and teat. , 1986, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[82]  A. Rathore,et al.  Teat orifice stretchability associated with teat diameter gradient and milk yield in lactating cows , 1977 .

[83]  G. Mein,et al.  Milking the 30,000-pound herd. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[84]  R. Miller,et al.  Increased susceptibility to intramammary infection following removal of teat canal keratin. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[85]  H. Barkema,et al.  Incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds grouped in three categories by bulk milk somatic cell counts. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[86]  F. Grommers,et al.  Incidence of clinical mastitis on farms with low somatic cell counts in bulk milk , 1989, Veterinary Record.

[87]  J. Hamann,et al.  Teat thickness changes may provide biological test for effective pulsation , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.

[88]  J. Hillerton,et al.  Hyperkeratosis of the teat duct orifice in the dairy cow , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.

[89]  I. Naumann,et al.  Investigation of milk flow from udder quarters. , 2000 .

[90]  A. Zecconi,et al.  Machine-induced teat tissue reactions and infection risk in a dairy herd free from contagious mastitis pathogens , 1992, Journal of Dairy Research.

[91]  S. Waage,et al.  Identification of risk factors for clinical mastitis in dairy heifers. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[92]  H. Allore,et al.  Cow- and quarter-level risk factors for Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[93]  A. Zecconi,et al.  Machine effects on cytological defence mechanisms in the teat tissue , 2004 .

[94]  S. Wells,et al.  Key health issues for dairy cattle--new and old. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[95]  H. Hogeveen,et al.  Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[96]  C. Burvenich,et al.  Machine-induced changes in the status of the bovine teat with respect to the new infection risk , 1994 .

[97]  A. Hope Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. , 2000 .

[98]  J. Verhoeff,et al.  Effects of a mastitis control programme on the incidence of clinical mastitis. , 1981, The Veterinary quarterly.

[99]  S. Martin,et al.  Disease, production and culling in Holstein-Friesian cows , 1984 .

[100]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  B-mode ultrasonography of mammary glands of cows, goats and sheep during α- and β-adrenergic agonist and oxytocin administration , 1992, Journal of Dairy Research.

[101]  V. Myllys,et al.  Effect of abrasion of teat orifice epithelium on development of bovine staphylococcal mastitis. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[102]  I. Vågsholm,et al.  Teat lesions with reference to housing and milking management. , 1990, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.

[103]  H. D. Larsen,et al.  The Effect of Post Milking Teat Dip and Suckling on Teat Skin Condition, Bacterial Colonisation, and Udder Health , 1998, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[104]  van Rensburg Ib,et al.  The morphology of the bovine teat canal: a preliminary report. , 1972 .

[105]  Bruce Roberts,et al.  Charlotte, North Carolina , 1958 .

[106]  R J Harmon,et al.  Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[107]  L. Dempfle,et al.  Studies on genetic evaluation of udder health using the LactoCorder , 1999 .

[108]  J. Goff,et al.  Physiological changes at parturition and their relationship to metabolic disorders. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[109]  A. Capuco,et al.  Effects of teatcup liner tension on teat canal keratin and teat condition in cows , 2000, Journal of Dairy Research.

[110]  E. O'Callaghan,et al.  Effect of vacuum fluctuations and liner slip on new infection rates. , 1980 .

[111]  R. W. Adkinson,et al.  Effects of vacuum and pulsation ratio on udder health. , 1982, Journal of dairy science.

[112]  Woolford Mw,et al.  Influence of pulsationless milking on teat canal keratin growth and turnover. , 1996 .

[113]  H. Worstorff,et al.  Effects of buckling pressure and teat length on calculated liner-open phases , 2002 .

[114]  J. Hamann,et al.  Teat tissue reactions to milking: effects of vacuum level. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.

[115]  G. A. Mein,et al.  Responses of the bovine teat to machine milking: measurement of changes in thickness of the teat apex , 1988, Journal of Dairy Research.

[116]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Automatic milking : a better understanding , 2004 .

[117]  R. J. Grindal,et al.  Influence of milk flow rate on new intramammary infection in dairy cows , 1991, Journal of Dairy Research.

[118]  R. P. Natzke,et al.  Change in Udder Health with Overmilking , 1978 .

[119]  F. Neijenhuis,et al.  Milking characteristics of two liners , 2001 .

[120]  R. Miller,et al.  Genetic parameters of several measures of milk flow rate and milking time. , 1976, Journal of dairy science.

[121]  M. Ireland,et al.  Clinical mastitis in dairy cattle in Ontario: frequency of occurrence and bacteriological isolates. , 1998, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[122]  C. Heuer,et al.  Hyperketonemia and the impairment of udder defense: a review. , 2000, Veterinary research.

[123]  Y. Gröhn,et al.  The association between previous 305-day milk yield and disease in New York State dairy cows. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[124]  H. Barkema,et al.  Risk factors for clinical mastitis in a random sample of dairy herds from the southern part of The Netherlands. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[125]  G. Banos,et al.  Genetic correlations among somatic cell scores, productive life, and type traits from the United States and udder health measures from Denmark and Sweden. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[126]  R. Sieber,et al.  Differential diagnosis of bovine teat lesions. , 1984, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Large animal practice.

[127]  O. Lind,et al.  Teat reactions in cows associated with machine milking. , 1992, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.

[128]  Whittlestone Wg,et al.  Machine milking and Mastitis , 1969 .

[129]  F. H. Dodd,et al.  Control of Udder Infection by Management , 1964 .

[130]  R. Sieber,et al.  Prevalence of chronic teat-end lesions and their relationship to intramammary infection in 22 herds of dairy cattle. , 1981, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[131]  H. Barkema,et al.  Relationship between teat-end callosity and occurrence of clinical mastitis. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[132]  P. Ruegg,et al.  The effect of manual forestripping on milking performance of Holstein dairy cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[133]  H. Barkema,et al.  Classification and longitudinal examination of callused teat ends in dairy cows. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[134]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  MILK EJECTION AND MILK REMOVAL OF SINGLE QUARTERS IN HIGH YIELDING DAIRY COWS NIST , 1999 .

[135]  R. Miller,et al.  Regeneration of teat canal keratin in lactating dairy cows. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[136]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Impact of automatic milking on animal health. , 2004 .

[137]  Ties Boerma,et al.  Getting the numbers right. , 2005, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[138]  R. Sieber The relationship of bovine teat end lesions to mastitis & machine milking. , 1980 .

[139]  J. Dearing,et al.  Changes in teat condition in Dutch herds converting from conventional to automated milking. , 2004 .

[140]  H. Barkema,et al.  The effects of machine milking on teat condition. , 2001 .

[141]  S. Nickerson Bovine mammary gland: structure and function; relationship to milk production and immunity to mastitis , 1994 .

[142]  C. McCulloch,et al.  Effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[143]  D. Gleeson,et al.  Effect of liner design, pulsator setting, and vacuum level on bovine teat tissue changes and milking characteristics as measured by ultrasonography , 2004, Irish veterinary journal.

[144]  F. H. Dodd,et al.  A method of controlling udder disease , 1966, The Veterinary Record.

[145]  J. Dearing,et al.  Cow factors related to the increase of somatic cell count after introduction of automatic milking. , 2004 .

[146]  D. Logue,et al.  The release of bradykinin in bovine mastitis. , 1999, Life sciences.

[147]  S. Spencer,et al.  Relationships of Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Counts to Prevalence of Intramammary Infection and to Indices of Herd Production 1. , 1982, Journal of food protection.

[148]  Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al.  Entrepreneurial behaviour of dutch dairy farmers under a milk quota system: goals, objectives and attitudes , 2004 .

[149]  H. Erb,et al.  Risk factors for clinical mastitis in herds with a low bulk milk somatic cell count. 2. Risk factors for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[150]  G. A. Mein,et al.  Machine milking and lactation. , 1992 .

[151]  B. Jayarao,et al.  Bulk-tank milk analysis. A useful tool for improving milk quality and herd udder health. , 2003, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[152]  R. Sieber,et al.  Milking machine effects on impacts and teat end lesions. , 1980 .