Teat Condition in Dairy Cows
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Auldist,et al. Effects of mastitis on raw milk and dairy products , 1998 .
[2] P C Bartlett,et al. Costs of clinical mastitis and mastitis prevention in dairy herds. , 1993, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
[3] P. Ruegg,et al. The relationship between antibiotic residue violations and somatic cell counts in Wisconsin dairy herds. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.
[4] L. Green,et al. Risk factors associated with clinical mastitis in low somatic cell count British dairy herds. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.
[5] Mcdonald Js. Radiographic method for anatomic study of the teat canal: changes with lactation age. , 1968 .
[6] P. Huijsmans,et al. The Dutch quality system for milking machine maintenance in 2003 and 2004 , 2001 .
[7] B. Poutrel. Susceptibility to mastitis: a review of factors related to the cow. , 1982, Annales de recherches veterinaires. Annals of veterinary research.
[8] Mcdonald Js. Radiographic method for anatomic study of the teat canal: changes between milking periods. , 1975 .
[9] J. O'shea. Machine milking factors affecting mastitis. A literature review , 1987 .
[10] H N Erb,et al. Design and validation of a dynamic discrete event stochastic simulation model of mastitis control in dairy herds. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.
[11] J. Hamann,et al. Measurement of machine-induced changes in thickness of the bovine teat , 1990, Journal of Dairy Research.
[12] F. Neijenhuis,et al. EVALUATION OF BOVINE TEAT CONDITION IN COMMERCIAL DAIRY HERDS: 1. NON-INFECTIOUS FACTORS , 2001 .
[13] N. E. Jensen,et al. The dynamics of Staphylococcus aureus intramammary infection in nine Danish dairy herds. , 2000, Veterinary microbiology.
[14] D. Hosmer,et al. Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .
[15] L. O. Ely,et al. Effect of region, herd size, and milk production on reasons cows leave the herd. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.
[16] Schalm Ow,et al. A radiographic study of the effects of mechanical milking and machine vaccum on the teat structures of the bovine mammary gland. , 1956 .
[17] R. Bruckmaier. Milk ejection during machine milking in dairy cows , 2001 .
[18] D. Wilson,et al. Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and Pennsylvania: prevalence and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.
[19] P. Moroni,et al. Field study on the relationship between teat thickness changes and intramammary infections , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.
[20] P. Cockcroft,et al. The likelihood of subclinical mastitis in quarters with different types of teat lesions in the dairy cow. , 2000 .
[21] O. Osterås,et al. Field studies show associations between pulsator characteristics and udder health , 1995, Journal of Dairy Research.
[22] S. Waage,et al. Clinical bovine mastitis in Norway. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.
[23] G. A. Mein,et al. Mechanics of the teat and teatcup liner during milking: information from radiographs , 1973, Journal of Dairy Research.
[24] L B Hansen,et al. Heritabilities of teat end shape and teat diameter and their relationships with somatic cell score. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.
[25] C. C. Thiel,et al. Compressive load applied by the teatcup liner to the bovine teat , 1987, Journal of Dairy Research.
[26] G. Bakken. Relationships between Udder and Teat Morphology, Mastitis and Milk Production in Norwegian Red Cattle , 1981 .
[27] H. Barkema,et al. Management practices associated with the incidence rate of clinical mastitis. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.
[28] G. Mein,et al. The bovine teat canal: information from measurement of velocity of milk flow from the teat , 1986, Journal of Dairy Research.
[29] P. Moroni,et al. Relationship between teat tissue immune defences and intramammary infections. , 2000, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.
[30] Bara Vinković,et al. ENVIRONMENT AND ANIMAL HEALTH , 2001 .
[31] Henk Hogeveen,et al. Milking interval, milk production and milk flow-rate in an automatic milking system , 2001 .
[32] R. Farnsworth. Observations on Teat Lesions , 1995 .
[33] M. Rasmussen. Influence of switch level of automatic cluster removers on milking performance and udder health , 1993, Journal of Dairy Research.
[34] E. R. Jackson. An outbreak of teat sores in a commercial dairy herd possibly associated with milking machine faults , 1970, Veterinary Record.
[35] A. Henken,et al. Multivariate epidemiological approach to coccidiosis in broilers. , 1992, Poultry science.
[36] J. Hillers,et al. Effect of teat-end shape on milking rate and udder health. , 1980 .
[37] M. Nielen,et al. Low somatic cell count: a risk factor for subsequent clinical mastitis in a dairy herd. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.
[38] A. Rathore. Teat shape and production associated with opening and prolapse of the teat orifice in Friesian cows. , 1977, The British veterinary journal.
[39] C. Cannon,et al. The Anatomy and Physiology of the Teat Sphincter , 1942 .
[40] E. V. Caruolo,et al. Ultrasonograms of Lactating Mammary Glands , 1967 .
[41] P. Bartlett,et al. Milk production and somatic cell count in Michigan dairy herds. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.
[42] S. Spencer,et al. Relationship among udder and teat morphology and milking characteristics. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.
[43] Lacy-Hulbert Sj,et al. Physical characteristics of the bovine teat canal and their influence on susceptibility to streptococcal infection. , 1995 .
[44] D. Boichard,et al. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits, and milking ease in first lactation Holsteins. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.
[45] R. J. Grindal,et al. Influence of milk flow rate and streak canal length on new intramammary infection in dairy cows , 1991, Journal of Dairy Research.
[46] Sue J. Welham,et al. Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual , 1994 .
[47] Schultze Wd,et al. Changes in penetrability of bovine papillary duct to endotoxin after milking. , 1983 .
[48] G. Rogers,et al. Heritability of intramammary infections at first parturition and relationships with sire transmitting abilities for somatic cell score, udder type traits, productive life, and protein yield. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.
[49] M. Rasmussen,et al. Effects of milkline vacuum, pulsator airline vacuum, and cluster weight on milk yield, teat condition, and udder health. , 2000, Journal of Dairy Science.
[50] F. Neijenhuis,et al. Teat condition and mastitis , 2004 .
[51] D. Gleeson,et al. Effect of machine milking on bovine teat sinus injury and teat canal keratin , 2003 .
[52] F. H. Dodd. Mastitis--progress on control. , 1983, Journal of dairy science.
[53] R. Bruckmaier,et al. Milk flow patterns at the end of milking at the whole udder or quarter levels: relationship to somatic cell counts , 2002 .
[54] F. Neijenhuis,et al. EVALUATION OF BOVINE TEAT CONDITION IN COMMERCIAL DAIRY HERDS: 3. GETTING THE NUMBERS RIGHT , 2001 .
[55] R. Miller,et al. Influence of pulsationless milking on teat canal keratin and mastitis. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.
[56] F. Neijenhuis,et al. EVALUATION OF BOVINE TEAT CONDITION IN COMMERCIAL DAIRY HERDS: 2. INFECTIOUS FACTORS AND INFECTIONS , 2001 .
[57] L. Green,et al. Study of clinical mastitis in British dairy herds with bulk milk somatic cell counts less than 150,000 cells/ml , 2002, Veterinary Record.
[58] R. Bruckmaier,et al. Effects of α- and β-adrenergic receptor stimulation and oxytocin receptor blockade on milking characteristics in dairy cows before and after removal of the teat sphincter , 2003 .
[59] F. H. Dodd,et al. Mastitis control and herd management. , 1981 .
[60] E. Rothenanger. Association and dissociation of single quarter and total milk flow in dairy cows: effects of milking with and without pre-stimulation , 1995 .
[61] P. D. Wood,et al. The biometry of lactation , 1977, The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[62] Henk Hogeveen,et al. Maximising the milking capacity of an automatic milking system. , 2000 .
[63] M. Rasmussen,et al. Pressure in the teat cistern and the mouth of the calf during suckling , 1998, Journal of Dairy Research.
[64] K. Smith. Mastitis control: a discussion. , 1983, Journal of Dairy Science.
[65] B. Mcdaniel,et al. Heritabilities of Teat Traits and their Relationships with Milk Yield, Somatic Cell Count, and Percent Two-Minute Milk , 1985 .
[66] A. Bramley,et al. Effect of milking without pulsation on teat duct colonization with Streptococcus agalactiae and penetrability to endotoxin. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.
[67] R. Bruckmaier,et al. Interruption of machine milking in dairy cows: effects on intramammary pressure and milking characteristics , 1995, Journal of Dairy Research.
[68] G. Mein,et al. Biological responses of the bovine teat to milking: information from measurements of milk flow-rate within single pulsation cycles , 1981, Journal of Dairy Research.
[69] Y. Schukken,et al. Incidence of clinical mastitis in a random sample of dairy herds in the southern Netherlands , 1996, Veterinary Record.
[70] H. Seegers,et al. Risk of clinical mastitis in dairy herds with a high proportion of low individual milk somatic-cell counts. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.
[71] W. Klee,et al. The relationship between milk yield and the incidence of some diseases in dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.
[72] J. W. Pankey,et al. Premilking udder hygiene. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.
[73] F. Degraves,et al. Economics of mastitis and mastitis control. , 1993, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.
[74] S. Oliver,et al. Prevalence of mastitis pathogens in herds participating in a mastitis control program. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.
[75] J. Dearing,et al. Effects of automatic milking on body condition score and fertility of dairy cows. , 2004 .
[76] R. J. Grindal,et al. Effect of duration of teat cup liner closure per pulsation cycle on bovine mastitis. , 1981, Journal of dairy science.
[77] H. Erb,et al. Risk factors for clinical mastitis in herds with a low bulk milk somatic cell count. 1. Data and risk factors for all cases. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.
[78] D. Shuster,et al. Factors affecting milk somatic cells and their role in health of the bovine mammary gland. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.
[79] H N Erb,et al. Partial budget of the discounted annual benefit of mastitis control strategies. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.
[80] W. Howard,et al. Economics of mastitis control. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.
[81] A. Ibrahim,et al. B-mode ultrasonography of the bovine udder and teat. , 1986, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
[82] A. Rathore,et al. Teat orifice stretchability associated with teat diameter gradient and milk yield in lactating cows , 1977 .
[83] G. Mein,et al. Milking the 30,000-pound herd. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.
[84] R. Miller,et al. Increased susceptibility to intramammary infection following removal of teat canal keratin. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.
[85] H. Barkema,et al. Incidence of clinical mastitis in dairy herds grouped in three categories by bulk milk somatic cell counts. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.
[86] F. Grommers,et al. Incidence of clinical mastitis on farms with low somatic cell counts in bulk milk , 1989, Veterinary Record.
[87] J. Hamann,et al. Teat thickness changes may provide biological test for effective pulsation , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.
[88] J. Hillerton,et al. Hyperkeratosis of the teat duct orifice in the dairy cow , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.
[89] I. Naumann,et al. Investigation of milk flow from udder quarters. , 2000 .
[90] A. Zecconi,et al. Machine-induced teat tissue reactions and infection risk in a dairy herd free from contagious mastitis pathogens , 1992, Journal of Dairy Research.
[91] S. Waage,et al. Identification of risk factors for clinical mastitis in dairy heifers. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.
[92] H. Allore,et al. Cow- and quarter-level risk factors for Streptococcus uberis and Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.
[93] A. Zecconi,et al. Machine effects on cytological defence mechanisms in the teat tissue , 2004 .
[94] S. Wells,et al. Key health issues for dairy cattle--new and old. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.
[95] H. Hogeveen,et al. Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.
[96] C. Burvenich,et al. Machine-induced changes in the status of the bovine teat with respect to the new infection risk , 1994 .
[97] A. Hope. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. , 2000 .
[98] J. Verhoeff,et al. Effects of a mastitis control programme on the incidence of clinical mastitis. , 1981, The Veterinary quarterly.
[99] S. Martin,et al. Disease, production and culling in Holstein-Friesian cows , 1984 .
[100] R. Bruckmaier,et al. B-mode ultrasonography of mammary glands of cows, goats and sheep during α- and β-adrenergic agonist and oxytocin administration , 1992, Journal of Dairy Research.
[101] V. Myllys,et al. Effect of abrasion of teat orifice epithelium on development of bovine staphylococcal mastitis. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.
[102] I. Vågsholm,et al. Teat lesions with reference to housing and milking management. , 1990, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.
[103] H. D. Larsen,et al. The Effect of Post Milking Teat Dip and Suckling on Teat Skin Condition, Bacterial Colonisation, and Udder Health , 1998, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.
[104] van Rensburg Ib,et al. The morphology of the bovine teat canal: a preliminary report. , 1972 .
[105] Bruce Roberts,et al. Charlotte, North Carolina , 1958 .
[106] R J Harmon,et al. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.
[107] L. Dempfle,et al. Studies on genetic evaluation of udder health using the LactoCorder , 1999 .
[108] J. Goff,et al. Physiological changes at parturition and their relationship to metabolic disorders. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.
[109] A. Capuco,et al. Effects of teatcup liner tension on teat canal keratin and teat condition in cows , 2000, Journal of Dairy Research.
[110] E. O'Callaghan,et al. Effect of vacuum fluctuations and liner slip on new infection rates. , 1980 .
[111] R. W. Adkinson,et al. Effects of vacuum and pulsation ratio on udder health. , 1982, Journal of dairy science.
[112] Woolford Mw,et al. Influence of pulsationless milking on teat canal keratin growth and turnover. , 1996 .
[113] H. Worstorff,et al. Effects of buckling pressure and teat length on calculated liner-open phases , 2002 .
[114] J. Hamann,et al. Teat tissue reactions to milking: effects of vacuum level. , 1993, Journal of dairy science.
[115] G. A. Mein,et al. Responses of the bovine teat to machine milking: measurement of changes in thickness of the teat apex , 1988, Journal of Dairy Research.
[116] Henk Hogeveen,et al. Automatic milking : a better understanding , 2004 .
[117] R. J. Grindal,et al. Influence of milk flow rate on new intramammary infection in dairy cows , 1991, Journal of Dairy Research.
[118] R. P. Natzke,et al. Change in Udder Health with Overmilking , 1978 .
[119] F. Neijenhuis,et al. Milking characteristics of two liners , 2001 .
[120] R. Miller,et al. Genetic parameters of several measures of milk flow rate and milking time. , 1976, Journal of dairy science.
[121] M. Ireland,et al. Clinical mastitis in dairy cattle in Ontario: frequency of occurrence and bacteriological isolates. , 1998, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.
[122] C. Heuer,et al. Hyperketonemia and the impairment of udder defense: a review. , 2000, Veterinary research.
[123] Y. Gröhn,et al. The association between previous 305-day milk yield and disease in New York State dairy cows. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.
[124] H. Barkema,et al. Risk factors for clinical mastitis in a random sample of dairy herds from the southern part of The Netherlands. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.
[125] G. Banos,et al. Genetic correlations among somatic cell scores, productive life, and type traits from the United States and udder health measures from Denmark and Sweden. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.
[126] R. Sieber,et al. Differential diagnosis of bovine teat lesions. , 1984, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Large animal practice.
[127] O. Lind,et al. Teat reactions in cows associated with machine milking. , 1992, Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe A.
[128] Whittlestone Wg,et al. Machine milking and Mastitis , 1969 .
[129] F. H. Dodd,et al. Control of Udder Infection by Management , 1964 .
[130] R. Sieber,et al. Prevalence of chronic teat-end lesions and their relationship to intramammary infection in 22 herds of dairy cattle. , 1981, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
[131] H. Barkema,et al. Relationship between teat-end callosity and occurrence of clinical mastitis. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.
[132] P. Ruegg,et al. The effect of manual forestripping on milking performance of Holstein dairy cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.
[133] H. Barkema,et al. Classification and longitudinal examination of callused teat ends in dairy cows. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.
[134] R. Bruckmaier,et al. MILK EJECTION AND MILK REMOVAL OF SINGLE QUARTERS IN HIGH YIELDING DAIRY COWS NIST , 1999 .
[135] R. Miller,et al. Regeneration of teat canal keratin in lactating dairy cows. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.
[136] Henk Hogeveen,et al. Impact of automatic milking on animal health. , 2004 .
[137] Ties Boerma,et al. Getting the numbers right. , 2005, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
[138] R. Sieber. The relationship of bovine teat end lesions to mastitis & machine milking. , 1980 .
[139] J. Dearing,et al. Changes in teat condition in Dutch herds converting from conventional to automated milking. , 2004 .
[140] H. Barkema,et al. The effects of machine milking on teat condition. , 2001 .
[141] S. Nickerson. Bovine mammary gland: structure and function; relationship to milk production and immunity to mastitis , 1994 .
[142] C. McCulloch,et al. Effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.
[143] D. Gleeson,et al. Effect of liner design, pulsator setting, and vacuum level on bovine teat tissue changes and milking characteristics as measured by ultrasonography , 2004, Irish veterinary journal.
[144] F. H. Dodd,et al. A method of controlling udder disease , 1966, The Veterinary Record.
[145] J. Dearing,et al. Cow factors related to the increase of somatic cell count after introduction of automatic milking. , 2004 .
[146] D. Logue,et al. The release of bradykinin in bovine mastitis. , 1999, Life sciences.
[147] S. Spencer,et al. Relationships of Bulk Tank Somatic Cell Counts to Prevalence of Intramammary Infection and to Indices of Herd Production 1. , 1982, Journal of food protection.
[148] Ruud B.M. Huirne,et al. Entrepreneurial behaviour of dutch dairy farmers under a milk quota system: goals, objectives and attitudes , 2004 .
[149] H. Erb,et al. Risk factors for clinical mastitis in herds with a low bulk milk somatic cell count. 2. Risk factors for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.
[150] G. A. Mein,et al. Machine milking and lactation. , 1992 .
[151] B. Jayarao,et al. Bulk-tank milk analysis. A useful tool for improving milk quality and herd udder health. , 2003, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.
[152] R. Sieber,et al. Milking machine effects on impacts and teat end lesions. , 1980 .