Evaluating the effects of radiation and acoustically-stimulated microbubble therapy in an in vivo breast cancer model

Ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles (USMB) cause localized vascular effects and sensitize tumors to radiation therapy (XRT). We investigated acoustic parameter optimization for combining USMB and XRT. We treated breast cancer xenograft tumors with 500 kHz pulsed ultrasound at varying pressures (570 or 740 kPa), durations (1 to 10 minutes), and microbubble concentrations (0.01 to 1% (v/v)). Radiation therapy (2 Gy) was administered immediately or after a 6-hour delay. Histological staining of tumors 24 hours after treatment detected changes in cell morphology, cell death, and microvascular density. Significant cell death resulted at 570 kPa after a 1-minute exposure with 1% (v/v) microbubbles with or without XRT. However, significant microvascular disruption required higher ultrasound pressure and exposure duration greater than 5 minutes. Introducing a 6-hour delay between treatments (USMB and XRT) showed a similar tumor effect with no further improvement in response as compared to when XRT was delivered immediately after USMB.

[1]  M. Oelze,et al.  Optimization of microbubble enhancement of hyperthermia for cancer therapy in an in vivo breast tumour model , 2020, PloS one.

[2]  W. Tran,et al.  Effect of Treatment Sequencing on the Tumor Response to Combined Treatment With Ultrasound‐Stimulated Microbubbles and Radiotherapy , 2020, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  G. Czarnota,et al.  Role of Acid Sphingomyelinase and Ceramide in Mechano-Acoustic Enhancement of Tumor Radiation Responses , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  G. Czarnota,et al.  Microbubble-based enhancement of radiation effect: Role of cell membrane ceramide metabolism , 2017, PloS one.

[5]  R. Chaer,et al.  Vascular applications of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound imaging , 2017, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  Aleksander S. Popel,et al.  Effects of endothelial cell proliferation and migration rates in a computational model of sprouting angiogenesis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  W. Tran,et al.  Breast tumor response to ultrasound mediated excitation of microbubbles and radiation therapy in vivo , 2016, Oncoscience.

[8]  G. Czarnota,et al.  Ultrasound-stimulated microbubble enhancement of radiation treatments: endothelial cell function and mechanism , 2015, Oncoscience.

[9]  W. Tran,et al.  Cellular characterization of ultrasound-stimulated microbubble radiation enhancement in a prostate cancer xenograft model , 2014, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[10]  G. Czarnota,et al.  Effects of biophysical parameters in enhancing radiation responses of prostate tumors with ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  M. Aschwanden,et al.  Novel applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in vascular medicine. , 2013, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[12]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Bioeffects of ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles on endothelial cells: gene expression changes associated with radiation enhancement in vitro. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  W. Tran,et al.  Microbubble and ultrasound radioenhancement of bladder cancer , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  Gregory J. Czarnota,et al.  Tumor radiation response enhancement by acoustical stimulation of the vasculature , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Michael C. Kolios,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound for the monitoring of novel microbubble and ultrasound radiosensitization. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  G. Czarnota,et al.  Enhancing chemotherapy by ultrasound and microbubbles: Effect of acoustic pressure and treatment order in in vitro suspension of reast and prostate cancer cells , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[17]  Juan Tu,et al.  The correlation between acoustic cavitation and sonoporation involved in ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection with polyethylenimine (PEI) in vitro. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[18]  Mark Borden,et al.  Microbubble Compositions, Properties and Biomedical Applications. , 2009, Bubble science engineering and technology.

[19]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[21]  Dai Fukumura,et al.  Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: targets for anti-angiogenesis and normalization. , 2007, Microvascular research.

[22]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[23]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Effects of High Intensity Focused Ultrasound on the Brain , 2007 .

[24]  C. Visser,et al.  Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy. , 2004, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[25]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  P. Thorpe Vascular Targeting Agents as Cancer Therapeutics , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  Z. Fuks,et al.  Radiation and ceramide-induced apoptosis , 2003, Oncogene.

[28]  J. Riess,et al.  Injectable microbubbles as contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound imaging: the key role of perfluorochemicals. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[29]  A. Dicker,et al.  Tumor response to ionizing radiation combined with antiangiogenesis or vascular targeting agents: exploring mechanisms of interaction. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[30]  Zvi Fuks,et al.  Tumor Response to Radiotherapy Regulated by Endothelial Cell Apoptosis , 2003, Science.

[31]  K. Hynynen,et al.  The threshold for brain damage in rabbits induced by bursts of ultrasound in the presence of an ultrasound contrast agent (Optison). , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  K. Camphausen,et al.  Angiogenesis inhibitors and radiotherapy of primary tumours , 2002, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[33]  Junru Wu,et al.  Reparable sonoporation generated by microstreaming. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  J. Overgaard,et al.  Improved Tumor Response by Combining Radiation and the Vascular-Damaging Drug 5,6-Dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic Acid , 2001, Radiation research.

[35]  E. Unger,et al.  Local drug and gene delivery through microbubbles. , 2001, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[36]  Zvi Fuks,et al.  Endothelial Apoptosis as the Primary Lesion Initiating Intestinal Radiation Damage in Mice , 2001, Science.

[37]  N. Ferrara,et al.  Molecular and biological properties of the vascular endothelial growth factor family of proteins. , 1992, Endocrine reviews.

[38]  J. Folkman,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis--correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  J. Denekamp Vascular endothelium as the vulnerable element in tumours. , 1984, Acta radiologica. Oncology.