On the limits of top-down control of visual selection

In the present study, observers viewed displays in which two equally salient color singletons were simultaneously present. Before each trial, observers received a word cue (e.g., the word red, or green) or a symbolic cue (a circle colored red or green) telling them which color singleton to select on the upcoming trial. Even though many theories of visual search predict that observers should be able to selectively attend the target color singleton, the results of the present study show that observers could not select the target singleton without interference from the irrelevant color singleton. The results indicate that the irrelevant color singleton captured attention. Only when the color of the target singleton remained the same from one trial to the next was selection perfect—an effect that is thought to be the result of passive automatic intertrial priming. The results of the present study demonstrate the limits of top-down attentional control.

[1]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Priming in Macaque Frontal Cortex during Popout Visual Search: Feature-Based Facilitation and Location-Based Inhibition of Return , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming , 2006 .

[4]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[5]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Attentional capture with rapidly changing attentional control settings. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  H. J. Muller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  E. Van der Burg,et al.  The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Detecting the presence of a singleton involves focal attention , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[11]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[12]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[13]  R. Remington,et al.  Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[14]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  The role of cueing in attentional capture , 2008 .

[17]  Clayton Hickey,et al.  Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: Evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology , 2010, Vision Research.

[18]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  J. Theeuwes.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[22]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[23]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Hsin-I Liao,et al.  On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[27]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.

[29]  H. Müller,et al.  Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? , 2006 .

[30]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection: Reply to commentaries , 2010 .

[31]  Bradley S. Gibson,et al.  The identity intrusion effect: Attentional capture or perceptual load? , 2008 .

[32]  G. Campana,et al.  Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  C. Bundesen.  A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[34]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[35]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  H. Müller,et al.  Distinct, but top-down modulable color and positional priming mechanisms in visual pop-out search , 2009, Psychological research.

[38]  S. Luck,et al.  Bridging the Gap between Monkey Neurophysiology and Human Perception: An Ambiguity Resolution Theory of Visual Selective Attention , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.