Clinical Evaluation of DuoDERM® Extra Thin for Postoperative Wound

[1]  J. Leyden,et al.  Semipermeable occlusive dressings. Effects on growth of pathogenic bacteria and reepithelialization of superficial wounds. , 1986, Archives of dermatology.

[2]  W. Eaglstein.  Experiences with biosynthetic dressings. , 1985, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[3]  W. Eaglstein,et al.  The effect of a semiocclusive dressing on the microbial population in superficial wounds. , 1984, Archives of surgery.

[4]  W. Eaglstein,et al.  The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in superficial wounds. , 1983, The Journal of surgical research.

[5]  L. Tinckler.  Surgical wound management with adhesive polyurethane membrane: a preferred method for routine usage. , 1983, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[6]  L. Vistnes,et al.  Comparison of synthetic adhesive moisture vapor permeable and fine mesh gauze dressings for split-thickness skin graft donor sites. , 1983, American journal of surgery.

[7]  A. Eaton.  A controlled trial to evaluate and compare a sutureless skin closure technique (Op‐Site Skin Closure) with conventional skin suturing and clipping in abdominal surgery , 1980, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  I. McGregor,et al.  The use of Opsite, a vapor permeable dressing, on skin graft donor sites , 1977 .

[9]  H. Maibach,et al.  Effect of Air Exposure and Occlusion on Experimental Human Skin Wounds , 1963, Nature.

[10]  G. Winter,et al.  Formation of the Scab and the Rate of Epithelization of Superficial Wounds in the Skin of the Young Domestic Pig , 1962, Nature.

[11]  J. Squire,et al.  Experiments with occlusive dressings of a new plastic. , 1948, Lancet.