Feasibility of a computer-assisted feedback system between dispatch centre and ambulances

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of a newly developed computer-assisted feedback system between dispatch centre and ambulances in Stockholm, Sweden. Methods A computer-assisted feedback system based on a Finnish model was designed to fit the Swedish emergency medical system. Feedback codes were identified and divided into three categories; assessment of patients' primary condition when ambulance arrives at scene, no transport by the ambulance and level of priority. Two ambulances and one emergency medical communication centre (EMCC) in Stockholm participated in the study. A sample of 530 feedback codes sent through the computer-assisted feedback system was reviewed. The information on the ambulance medical records was compared with the feedback codes used and 240 assignments were further analyzed. Results The used feedback codes sent from ambulance to EMCC were correct in 92% of the assignments. The most commonly used feedback code sent to the emergency medical dispatchers was ‘agree with the dispatchers' assessment’. In addition, in 160 assignments there was a mismatch between emergency medical dispatchers and ambulance nurse assessments. Conclusion Our results have shown a high agreement between medical dispatchers and ambulance nurse assessment. The feasibility of the feedback codes seems to be acceptable based on the small margin of error. The computer-assisted feedback system may, when used on a daily basis, make it possible for the medical dispatchers to receive feedback in a structural way. The EMCC organization can directly evaluate any changes in the assessment protocol by structured feedback sent from the ambulance.

[1]  K. Neely,et al.  T HE S TRENGTH OF S PECIFIC EMS D ISPATCHER Q UESTIONS FOR I DENTIFYING P ATIENTS WITH I MPORTANT C LINICAL F IELD F INDINGS , 2000, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[2]  Richard Zane,et al.  International EMS systems: The United States: past, present, and future. , 2004, Resuscitation.

[3]  Mårten Rosenqvist,et al.  Dispatcher-assisted telephone-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation: an underused lifesaving system , 2007, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[4]  E. Sobo,et al.  Developing indicators for emergency medical services (EMS) system evaluation and quality improvement: a statewide demonstration and planning project. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[5]  Marcus Chacon,et al.  Accuracy of Stroke Recognition by Emergency Medical Dispatchers andParamedics—San Diego Experience , 2008, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[6]  P. Calle,et al.  The 'early access' link in the chain of survival for cardiac arrest victims in Ghent, Belgium. , 1994, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[7]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[8]  J. Herlitz,et al.  Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care , 2007, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[9]  Greg Scott,et al.  Profile of Emergency Medical Dispatch Calls for Breathing Problems within the Medical Priority Dispatch System Protocol , 2008, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[10]  B. Knapp,et al.  EMS-initiated refusal of transport: the current state of affairs. , 2009, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  R. Karlsten,et al.  Who calls for the ambulance: implications for decision support. A descriptive study from a Swedish dispatch centre , 2004, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[12]  Jerry Overton,et al.  P ERFORMANCE M EASUREMENTS IN E MERGENCY M EDICAL S ERVICES , 2002, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[13]  What are the highest priorities for research in emergency prehospital care? , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[14]  R. Wredling,et al.  Factors and circumstances related to complaints in emergency medical dispatching in Sweden: an exploratory study , 2003, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[15]  A. Kihlgren,et al.  Operators' experiences of emergency calls , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  A. Langhelle,et al.  International EMS Systems: the Nordic countries. , 2004, Resuscitation.

[17]  J. Overton,et al.  Recommended guidelines for reporting on emergency medical dispatch when conducting research in emergency medicine: the Utstein style. , 2008, Resuscitation.