Experiencing interactive voice response (IVR) as a participatory medium: The case of CGNet Swara in India

With the widespread use of mobile phones in the developing world, interactive voice response (IVR) systems are increasingly accessible to people with low literacy and/or limited financial resources. Interest in using IVR systems as a means to increase citizen participation in society has increased. Yet, research exploring the potential of IVRs—with particular affordances, constraints, and norms—to facilitate citizen participation in society remains limited. Drawing on field data gathered as part of a study of CGNet Swara, an IVR-based citizen journalism platform in rural India, we introduce the concept of a “participatory IVR” and undertake a phenomenological inquiry to account for user interactions with the system.

[1]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[2]  James E. Katz,et al.  Public attitudes toward voice-based electronic messaging technologies in the United States: A national survey of opinions about voice response units and telephone answering machines , 1997, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Understanding, fostering, and supporting cultures of participation , 2011, INTR.

[4]  Ethan Zuckerman,et al.  Meet the bridgebloggers , 2007 .

[5]  Udhyakumar Nallasamy,et al.  Speech interfaces for equitable access to information technology , 2007 .

[6]  Ronald Rosenfeld,et al.  HealthLine: Speech-based access to health information by low-literate users , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.

[7]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Power to the peers: authority of source effects for a voice-based agricultural information service in rural India , 2012, ICTD.

[8]  Terri L. Griffith.  Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[9]  William Thies,et al.  An Audio Wiki for Publishing User-Generated Content in the Developing World , 2008 .

[10]  Merryl Ford,et al.  MobilED - An Accessible Mobile Learning Platform for Africa? , 2007 .

[11]  Kirk W. Duthler.  The Politeness of Requests Made Via Email and Voicemail: Support for the Hyperpersonal Model , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[13]  Philip Frank Reinders,et al.  The architecture of participation , 2017 .

[14]  M. Castells.  Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[15]  I. Madamombe.  Community radio: A voice for the poor , 2005 .

[16]  Paola Prado,et al.  Empowering rural citizen journalism via web 2.0 technologies , 2009, C&T.

[17]  Thorsten Quandt,et al.  PARTICIPATORY JOURNALISM PRACTICES IN THE MEDIA AND BEYOND , 2008 .

[18]  Y BaldwinCarliss,et al.  The Architecture of Participation , 2006 .

[19]  N. Couldry.  The Productive ‘Consumer’ and the Dispersed ‘Citizen’ , 2004 .

[20]  S. Allan,et al.  Citizen journalism: global perspectives , 2009 .

[21]  A. Hintz,et al.  Social Science is Police Science: Researching Grass-Roots Activism , 2010 .

[22]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[23]  Jennifer Rauch.  Activists as interpretive communities: rituals of consumption and interaction in an alternative media audience , 2007 .

[24]  Donald M. Truxillo,et al.  Applicant Reactions to Different Selection Technology: Face-to-Face, Interactive Voice Response, and Computer-Assisted Telephone Screening Interviews , 2004 .

[25]  Aaditeshwar Seth,et al.  PhonePeti: exploring the role of an answering machine system in a community radio station in India , 2012, ICTD '12.

[26]  Tanja Dreher.  Listening across difference: Media and multiculturalism beyond the politics of voice , 2009 .

[27]  Ethan Zuckerman,et al.  Decentralizing the Mobile Phone: A Second ICT4D Revolution? , 2010 .

[28]  Vicente L. Rafael,et al.  The Cell Phone and the Crowd: Messianic Politics in the Contemporary Philippines , 2003, Histories of the Future.

[29]  Thomas Rlindlof.  Media Audiences as Interpretive Communities , 1988 .

[30]  Richard Heeks,et al.  ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development , 2008, Computer.

[31]  Jonathan Donner,et al.  The Rules of Beeping: Exchanging Messages Via Intentional "Missed Calls" on Mobile Phones , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt , 2013 .

[33]  Juan Francisco Salazar,et al.  Citizens' media and communication , 2009 .

[34]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  S. Revi Sterling,et al.  Advancement through interactive radio , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development.

[36]  Arun Kumar,et al.  The spoken web application framework: user generated content and service creation through low-end mobiles , 2010, W4A.

[37]  T. Meyer,et al.  Phenomenology, empiricism, and media experience , 1987 .

[38]  M. Lim.  Clicks, Cabs, and Coffee Houses: Social Media and Oppositional Movements in Egypt, 2004–2011 , 2012 .

[39]  James E. Katz,et al.  Mobile Media and Communication: Some Important Questions , 2007 .

[40]  Mokeira Masita-Mwangi,et al.  Tangaza: frugal group messaging through speech and text , 2010, ACM DEV '10.

[41]  B. Brigidi,et al.  Therapeutic Interactive Voice Response for chronic pain reduction and relapse prevention , 2008, PAIN.

[42]  P. Howard,et al.  What Best Explains Successful Protest Cascades? ICTs and the Fuzzy Causes of the Arab Spring , 2013 .

[43]  Tanja Dreher.  Speaking up or being heard? Community media interventions and the politics of listening , 2010 .

[44]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[45]  B. Shneiderman,et al.  The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation , 2009 .

[46]  Jonathan Hassid.  Safety Valve or Pressure Cooker? Blogs in Chinese Political Life , 2012 .

[47]  Lauren Elkin,et al.  A Blogger ’ s Blog : Exploring the Definition of a Medium , 2006 .

[48]  S. Bailur.  THE COMPLEXITIES OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN ICT FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS: THE CASE OF "OUR VOICES" , 2007 .

[49]  Heather K. Evans,et al.  The Representation of Women in Publication: An Analysis of Political Communication and the International Journal of Press/Politics , 2010, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[50]  Erik Duval,et al.  Quantitative analysis of user-generated content on the Web , 2008 .

[51]  Ilhem Allagui,et al.  The Arab Spring and the Role of ICTs Editorial Introduction , 2011 .

[52]  William Thies,et al.  Emergent practices around CGNet Swara, voice forum for citizen journalism in rural India , 2012, ICTD.

[53]  Jo Tacchi,et al.  Open content creation: The issues of voice and the challenges of listening , 2012, New Media Soc..