Hypothesis testing in functional linear models

Functional data arise frequently in biomedical studies, where it is often of interest to investigate the association between functional predictors and a scalar response variable. While functional linear models (FLM) are widely used to address these questions, hypothesis testing for the functional association in the FLM framework remains challenging. A popular approach to testing the functional effects is through dimension reduction by functional principal component (PC) analysis. However, its power performance depends on the choice of the number of PCs, and is not systematically studied. In this article, we first investigate the power performance of the Wald-type test with varying thresholds in selecting the number of PCs for the functional covariates, and show that the power is sensitive to the choice of thresholds. To circumvent the issue, we propose a new method of ordering and selecting principal components to construct test statistics. The proposed method takes into account both the association with the response and the variation along each eigenfunction. We establish its theoretical properties and assess the finite sample properties through simulations. Our simulation results show that the proposed test is more robust against the choice of threshold while being as powerful as, and often more powerful than, the existing method. We then apply the proposed method to the cerebral white matter tracts data obtained from a diffusion tensor imaging tractography study.

[1]  Gareth M. James Generalized linear models with functional predictors , 2002 .

[2]  Jane-ling Wang,et al.  Functional linear regression analysis for longitudinal data , 2005, math/0603132.

[3]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective , 2006 .

[4]  H. Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis for Sparse Longitudinal Data , 2005 .

[5]  Ciprian M Crainiceanu,et al.  Penalized Functional Regression , 2011, Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America.

[6]  Piotr Kokoszka,et al.  Inference for Functional Data with Applications , 2012 .

[7]  P. Hall,et al.  On properties of functional principal components analysis , 2006 .

[8]  André Mas,et al.  Testing hypotheses in the functional linear model , 2003 .

[9]  Ana-Maria Staicu,et al.  Generalized Multilevel Functional Regression , 2009, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[10]  J. Ramsay,et al.  Some Tools for Functional Data Analysis , 1991 .

[11]  Fang Yao,et al.  Structured functional additive regression in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces , 2014, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[12]  C. Crainiceanu,et al.  Corrected Confidence Bands for Functional Data Using Principal Components , 2013, Biometrics.

[13]  G. Dunteman Principal Components Analysis , 1989 .

[14]  Brian S. Caffo,et al.  Multilevel functional principal component analysis , 2009 .

[15]  R. Muirhead Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory , 1982, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[16]  Raymond J Carroll,et al.  Generalized Functional Linear Models With Semiparametric Single-Index Interactions , 2010, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[17]  Bernard W. Silverman,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 1997 .

[18]  Ciprian M. Crainiceanu,et al.  Restricted Likelihood Ratio Tests for Functional Effects in the Functional Linear Model , 2014, Technometrics.

[19]  Ana-Maria Staicu,et al.  Classical testing in functional linear models , 2016, Journal of nonparametric statistics.

[20]  P. Sarda,et al.  Functional linear model , 1999 .

[21]  Ulrich Stadtmüller,et al.  Generalized functional linear models , 2005 .