Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes?

Debate continues regarding the nature and desirability of graduate attributes, driven partly by stakeholder expectations that universities will prepare employees for the knowledge economy and partly by higher education academics and learning specialists. While universities appear to have accepted their new vocational role, there is considerable confusion over how these things – graduate skills, attributes or capabilities – should be defined and implemented. Conceptual confusion combined with a range of external pressures and internal management issues have the potential to derail this important project. To date, stakeholders such as government and business, as well as universities have seriously underestimated the kind of cultural, institutional and policy changes required to implement the graduate skills agenda. This paper outlines the issues that will need to be addressed by the higher education sector if universities are to play a proactive rather than reactive role in shaping this agenda.

[1]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[2]  John Clanchy,et al.  Generic Skills in the Context of Higher Education. , 1995 .

[3]  Robert H. Ennis.  Incorporating Critical Thinking in the Curriculum: An Introduction to Some Basic Issues , 1997 .

[4]  Mary Bryant,et al.  The transformation of higher education in Australia university teaching is at a crossroad , 1999 .

[5]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[6]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Understanding Learning and Teaching: the experience in higher education , 1999 .

[7]  Craig McInnis,et al.  The work roles of academics in Australian universities , 1999 .

[8]  P. Sheldon,et al.  The Australian chamber of Commerce and Industry , 1999 .

[9]  D. Boud.  Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society , 2000 .

[10]  P. Candy.  Knowledge Navigators and Lifelong Learners: Producing graduates for the information society , 2000 .

[11]  Ronald Barnett,et al.  Supercomplexity and the Curriculum , 2000 .

[12]  Alex Radloff,et al.  Quality and Generic (Professional) Skills , 2000 .

[13]  Robert Anthony Cannon,et al.  Evaluating learning or evaluating teaching: Is there a difference and does it matter? , 2001 .

[14]  Ron Oliver,et al.  Developing an instructional design strategy to support generic skills development , 2002, ASCILITE.

[15]  Paul Hager,et al.  ENHANCING THE LEARNING AND EMPLOYABILITY OF GRADUATES : THE ROLE OF GENERIC SKILLS , 2002 .

[16]  Sally M. Kift.  Harnessing assessment and feedback to assure quality outcomes for graduate capability development: a legal education case study , 2002 .

[17]  L. Parker,et al.  Framing Institutional Policies on Literacies. , 2002 .

[18]  Sally M. Kift,et al.  Assuring Quality in the Casualisation of Teaching, Learning and Assessment: Towards Best Practice for the First Year Experience , 2002 .

[19]  S. Mayson,et al.  Internationalisation of curricula: an alternative to the Taylorisation of academic work , 2004 .

[20]  Natalie Cuffe,et al.  Embedding graduate attributes in law why, how, and is it working? / , 2002 .

[21]  Marcia Devlin,et al.  An Improved Questionnaire for Gathering Student Perceptions of Teaching and Learning , 2002 .

[22]  Denise Mulligan,et al.  Cultures of learning: critical reading in the social and applied sciences , 2002 .

[23]  M. Kimber.  The Tenured 'Core' and the Tenuous 'Periphery': The casualisation of academic work in Australian universities , 2003 .

[24]  Bruce Jay Nelson,et al.  Our universities: backing Australia’s future , 2003 .

[25]  T. Moore,et al.  The critical thinking debate: how general are general thinking skills? , 2004 .

[26]  M. Mentkowski,et al.  Abilities that distinguish the effectiveness of five‐year alumna performance across work, family and civic roles: a higher education validation , 2004 .

[27]  Shaping university teaching towards measurement for accountability: problems of the Graduate Skills Assessment test , 2004 .

[28]  Jennifer Sumsion,et al.  Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: a critical evaluation , 2004 .

[29]  Carol Bond,et al.  Undergraduates' experiences of critical thinking , 2004 .

[30]  S. Debowski,et al.  The evaluative state , 2004 .

[31]  Bronwyn James,et al.  Working ‘through’ graduate attributes: A bottom-up approach , 2004 .

[32]  Travis Butler,et al.  Aristotle on Nous of Simples , 2004, Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

[33]  S. Barrie.  A research‐based approach to generic graduate attributes policy , 2004 .

[34]  Sarah J. Stein,et al.  Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum , 2004 .

[35]  S. Barrie,et al.  Rethinking Generic Graduate Attributes , 2005 .

[36]  Gary L. Karns.  An Update of Marketing Student Perceptions of Learning Activities: Structure, Preferences, and Effectiveness , 2005 .

[37]  Johannes Weber,et al.  Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates , 2006 .

[38]  Martin Davies.  An ‘infusion’ approach to critical thinking: Moore on the critical thinking debate , 2006 .

[39]  “Great classroom teaching” and more , 2006 .

[40]  S. Barrie.  Understanding What We Mean by the Generic Attributes of Graduates , 2006 .

[41]  DEVELOPING GENERIC SKILLS: EXAMPLES OF BEST PRACTICE In July last year the Business/ Higher Education Round Table (B-HERT) published a Position Paper on “ENHANCING THE LEARNING AND EMPLOYABILITY OF GRADUATES: THE ROLE OF GENERIC SKILLS”. The Position , .