High-level mobility outcomes following acquired brain injury: A preliminary evaluation

Primary objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a high-level mobility programme for people with acquired brain injury (ABI). Research design: A cohort study which evaluated the efficacy of a high-level mobility programme for people with ABI. Setting: A major rehabilitation hospital. Participants: Twenty-eight people with acquired brain injury. Experimental interventions: A 3 month high-level mobility programme conducted twice weekly consisting of strengthening exercises, pre-running and running drills and agility exercises supplemented with a gym or home exercise programme. Main outcomes and results: The primary outcome measure was the high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT). Participants were predominantly male and young (average age 33.2 years, range 16–72 years) with chronic ABI. HiMAT scores for the 28 participants who returned at the 3 month follow-up initially ranged from 6–44 points (mean 20.3). The 3 month follow-up scores ranged from 12–51 points (mean 29.2). The mean HiMAT score change ranged from 2–20 points (mean 8.9). Conclusions: Significant recovery in high-level mobility was achieved during a 3 month running programme. People with chronic ABI may also expect to benefit from retraining high-level mobility. Clinical trials are needed to assess the effectiveness of training programmes for high-level mobility.

[1]  J. Eng,et al.  The use of aerobic exercise training in improving aerobic capacity in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  D. Wade,et al.  The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. , 1991, International disability studies.

[3]  J. Olver,et al.  A profile of outcome: 2 years after traumatic brain injury. , 1995, Brain injury.

[4]  Gavin Williams,et al.  The concurrent validity and responsiveness of the high-level mobility assessment tool for measuring the mobility limitations of people with traumatic brain injury. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Coping Strategies and Emotional Outcome following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Comparison with Orthopedic Patients , 2000, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Olver,et al.  Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury. , 1996, Brain injury.

[7]  E. W. Miller,et al.  Running Training After Stroke: A Single-Subject Report , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[8]  M. Sliwinski,et al.  The Benefits of Exercise in Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Study , 1998, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[9]  Gavin Williams,et al.  Measuring High-Level Mobility After Traumatic Brain Injury , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  Brenda Brouwer,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of supervised versus unsupervised exercise programs for ambulatory stroke survivors. , 2006, Stroke.

[11]  A Bateman,et al.  Can brain-injured patients participate in an aerobic exercise programme during early inpatient rehabilitation? , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[12]  Sullivan Sj,et al.  Aerobic and neuromuscular training: effect on the capacity, efficiency, and fatigability of patients with traumatic brain injuries. , 1990 .

[13]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  Longitudinal profile of early motor recovery following severe traumatic brain injury. , 1996, Brain Injury.

[14]  S. Hillier,et al.  Outcomes 5 years post-traumatic brain injury (with further reference to neurophysical impairment and disability). , 1997, Brain injury.

[15]  M. Morris,et al.  The high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 1: Item generation , 2005, Brain injury.

[16]  M. Holden,et al.  Partial body weight support with treadmill locomotion to improve gait after incomplete spinal cord injury: a single-subject experimental design. , 1998, Physical therapy.

[17]  Li-Shan Chou,et al.  An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Ray-Yau Wang,et al.  Dual-task exercise improves walking ability in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  J. Mount,et al.  Body Weight‐Supported Treadmill Training Versus Conventional Gait Training for People With Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury , 2005, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[20]  S. Hillier,et al.  Awareness and perceptions of outcomes after traumatic brain injury. , 1997, Brain injury.

[21]  A. Pickering,et al.  The effect of aerobic training on rehabilitation outcomes after recent severe brain injury: a randomized controlled evaluation. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  L. Forrester,et al.  Treadmill Exercise Rehabilitation Improves Ambulatory Function and Cardiovascular Fitness in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2005, Stroke.

[23]  J. Batchelor,et al.  Preliminary validation of a clinical scale for measuring the duration of post‐traumatic amnesia , 1986, The Medical journal of Australia.

[24]  M. Alexander,et al.  Recovery of ambulation after traumatic brain injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  The role of and possibilities for physical conditioning programmes in the rehabilitation of traumatically brain-injured persons. , 1990, Brain injury.

[26]  M. Morris,et al.  The high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT) for traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Content validity and discriminability , 2005, Brain injury.

[27]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Aerobic training in brain-injured patients , 1994 .

[28]  S. Kuna,et al.  Progressive exercise testing in closed head-injured subjects: comparison of exercise apparatus in assessment of a physical conditioning program. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[29]  S. Studenski,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.