Knowledge exchange processes in Industrial Districts and the emergence of networks

This paper aims at exploring conditions under which the need for knowledge exchange within a small firms’ cluster generates a structure of links between firms. We focus in particular on small firms’ clusters called Industrial Districts (IDs). Specifically, we analyze IDs with flexible specialization, in which knowledge exchange is driven by the search for complementary knowledge assets. Previous works of the authors proposed an agent-based model of IDs to explore the properties of networks emerging from the interaction of firms prompted by the search and exchange of complementary specialized knowledge. This model showed that limited relational capability, due to the small size, and an exchange mechanism solely based on the barter of complementary knowledge are structural conditions that limit individual firms’ growth in IDs with flexible specialization. This paper presents a new version of this model to analyze the role of embeddedness of relationships among IDs firms in shaping the emergent network structures. The aim of the paper is to answer to the following research questions: Can knowledge complementariness explain the emergence of a stable network of firms within a small firms’ cluster? What are the structural properties of these networks? Which role does the embeddedness of relationships among firms play in shaping the structure of emerging networks?

[1]  Nanette S. Levinson,et al.  Cross-national alliances and interorganizational learning , 1995 .

[2]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[3]  Alfred Marshall,et al.  Industry and Trade , 2003 .

[4]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[5]  G. Becattini,et al.  Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy , 1990 .

[6]  Martin H. Levinson.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2004 .

[7]  Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsreihe,et al.  Simulating Knowledge-Generation and -Distribution Processes in Innovation Collaborations and Networks , 2006 .

[8]  Anna Grandori,et al.  Interfirm Networks : Organization and Industrial Competitiveness , 1999 .

[9]  Ivana Paniccia.  One, a Hundred, Thousands of Industrial Districts. Organizational Variety in Local Networks of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises , 1998 .

[10]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[11]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[12]  Rakesh Basant,et al.  Knowledge Flows and Industrial Clusters: An Analytical Review of Literature , 2002 .

[13]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[14]  K. Provan,et al.  An Emergent Theory of Structure and Outcomes in Small-Firm Strategic Manufacturing Networks , 1997 .

[15]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[16]  C. Sabel,et al.  The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity , 1984 .

[17]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[18]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Giovanni Schiuma,et al.  Knowledge in Inter-Firm Relationships in an Industrial District , 2000 .

[20]  W. Powell.  Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis , 1991 .

[21]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[22]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[23]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Bilateral Collaboration and the Emergence of Innovation Networks , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  Entrepreneurship Research on Network Processes: A Review and Ways Forward , 2010 .

[25]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[26]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[27]  Enzo Rullani,et al.  Networks and Internationalization: Managing Complexity Through Knowledge , 1993 .

[28]  Sebastiano Brusco.  The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration , 1982 .

[29]  Gabi Dei Ottati,et al.  Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organization model , 1994 .

[30]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[31]  R. Cowan.  Network models of innovation and knowledge diffusion , 2004 .

[32]  Maximino Aldana-Gonzalez,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2003 .

[33]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[34]  Luca Zan,et al.  Perspectives on strategic change , 1993 .

[35]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[37]  D. Brillinger,et al.  Handbook of methods of applied statistics , 1967 .

[38]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up , 1996 .

[39]  Karen Page,et al.  Network Forms of Organization , 1998 .

[40]  Müge Özman.  Network Formation and Strategic Firm Behaviour to Explore and Exploit , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[41]  Ilaria Giannoccaro,et al.  Supply chain cooperation in industrial districts: A simulation analysis , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Guido Fioretti,et al.  Information Structure and Behaviour of a Textile Industrial District , 2001, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..