Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production.

Studies of semantic context effects in spoken word production have typically distinguished between categorical (or taxonomic) and associative relations. However, associates tend to confound semantic features or morphological representations, such as whole-part relations and compounds (e.g., BOAT-anchor, BEE-hive). Using a picture-word interference paradigm and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we manipulated categorical (COW-rat) and thematic (COW-pasture) TARGET-distractor relations in a balanced design, finding interference and facilitation effects on naming latencies, respectively, as well as differential patterns of brain activation compared with an unrelated distractor condition. While both types of distractor relation activated the middle portion of the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG) consistent with retrieval of conceptual or lexical representations, categorical relations involved additional activation of posterior left MTG, consistent with retrieval of a lexical cohort. Thematic relations involved additional activation of the left angular gyrus. These results converge with recent lesion evidence implicating the left inferior parietal lobe in processing thematic relations and may indicate a potential role for this region during spoken word production.

[1]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Electrophysiological Chronometry of Semantic Context Effects in Language Production , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Picture naming by young children: norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Mix, a program for pseudorandomization , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[4]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  A. Caramazza,et al.  When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Grant M. Walker,et al.  Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Electrophysiological effects of semantic context in picture and word naming , 2011, NeuroImage.

[9]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Speech Errors and Language Production: Neuropsychological and Connectionist Perspectives. , 2003 .

[10]  K. Mcmahon,et al.  Improving EPI imaging quality and sound levels with bandwidth selection , 2004 .

[11]  Bernhard Müller,et al.  Sparse imaging and continuous event‐related fMRI in the visual domain: A systematic comparison , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  G I de Zubicaray,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture‐word paradigm: An event‐related fMRI study employing overt responses , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Independence of Input and Output Phonology in Word Processing and Short-Term Memory , 1999 .

[15]  John Ashburner,et al.  A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm , 2007, NeuroImage.

[16]  Albert Costa,et al.  On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  The dynamic microstructure of speech production: semantic interference built on the fly. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  Imaging speech production using fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[19]  Wido La Heij,et al.  In Defense of the Lexical-Competition Account of Picture-Word Interference: A Comment On Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006) , 2006, Cortex.

[20]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm , 2009, NeuroImage.

[22]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Information flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Applications , 2002, NeuroImage.

[24]  C. Price.  The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009 , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming , 2004, Brain and Language.

[26]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[27]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Independent Distractor Frequency and Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Picture–Word Interference: fMRI Evidence for Post-lexical and Lexical Accounts according to Distractor Type , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[30]  L. Cohen,et al.  The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production , 2006, Brain Research.

[31]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Heterogeneity of the Left Temporal Lobe in Semantic Representation and Control: Priming Multiple versus Single Meanings of Ambiguous Words , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Milena Rabovsky,et al.  Depth of Conceptual Knowledge Modulates Visual Processes during Word Reading , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[34]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Why does lexical selection have to be so hard? Comment on Abdel Rahman and Melinger's swinging lexical network proposal , 2009 .

[35]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series , 2004, NeuroImage.

[36]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. , 1975 .

[37]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  Francois-Xavier Alario,et al.  Distinct representations of phonemes, syllables, and supra-syllabic sequences in the speech production network , 2009, NeuroImage.

[40]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Dismissing lexical competition does not make speaking any easier: A rejoinder to Mahon and Caramazza (2009) , 2009 .

[41]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .

[42]  Thomas A. Schreiber,et al.  The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[43]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review , 2009 .

[44]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Dissociating short-term memory and language impairment: The importance of item and serial order information , 2012 .

[45]  R. Poldrack.  Region of interest analysis for fMRI. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[46]  W. Heij,et al.  Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .

[47]  Albert Costa,et al.  Riding the Lexical Speedway: A Critical Review on the Time Course of Lexical Selection in Speech Production , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[48]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  The neural correlates of language production , 2000 .

[49]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Monica Baciu,et al.  The sensory-motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[51]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  The determiner congruency effect in language production investigated with functional MRI , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[52]  K Ugurbil,et al.  Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high‐field NMR , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[53]  J. Segui,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in Picture Naming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[54]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Does phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge? Electrophysiological evidence for parallel processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[55]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[57]  J. Hofmans,et al.  The dynamic microstructure of organizational commitment , 2015 .

[58]  P. J. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture–word interference task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[59]  Jelmer P. Borst,et al.  Stroop and picture—word interference are two sides of the same coin , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  Steve Majerus,et al.  Verbal short-term memory and temporary activation of language representations: the importance of distinguishing item and order information , 2009 .

[61]  Vincent L. Gracco,et al.  On the selection of words and oral motor responses: Evidence of a response-independent fronto-parietal network , 2010, Cortex.

[62]  Z. Estes,et al.  Thematic thinking : the apprehension and consequences of thematic relations , 2011 .

[63]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Exploring the Activation of Semantic and Phonological Codes during Speech Planning with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Alexander Hammers,et al.  Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[65]  J. Grainger,et al.  ERP Evidence for Ultra-Fast Semantic Processing in the Picture–Word Interference Paradigm , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[66]  Daniel J. Acheson,et al.  Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.