Optimal Combinations of Isometric Normalization Tests for the Production of Maximum Voluntary Activation of the Shoulder Muscles.

OBJECTIVE To identify the smallest combinations of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) tests that produce near-maximum voluntary activation (MVA) for a large proportion of participants for the shoulder girdle muscles. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Research center. PARTICIPANTS Healthy participants (N=38). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The electromyography of 12 shoulder muscles was recorded while participants performed 15 MVIC tests. The smallest combinations of MVIC tests that met our acceptance criterion (ie, produce 90% of MVA for 90% of participants) were identified. Optimal combinations were identified for each of the 12 muscles individually and for the 12 muscles simultaneously. Electromyographic activation levels of the 95th highest percentile obtained with our optimal combinations and with the Four Normalization Tests previously recommended were compared using paired t tests. RESULTS Between 2 and 6 MVIC tests were required for each of the 12 muscles, and 12 MVIC tests were required for the 12 muscles to meet the acceptance criterion. These optimal combinations produced electromyographic activation levels of the 95th highest percentile comprised between 97% and 100% of MVA. These electromyographic activation levels were significantly higher than the electromyographic activation levels obtained with the Four Normalization Tests. CONCLUSIONS Although the number of MVIC tests to normalize 12 shoulder muscles was increased compared with previous recommendations, the proposed method ensures that near-MVA (>90%) was obtained for a large proportion of participants (>90%). Moreover, because electromyographic activation levels of the 95th highest percentile were at least 97% of MVA, the identified combinations could reduce the interparticipant variability. The proposed combinations could help to improve electromyographic normalization and therefore reduce the misinterpretations regarding shoulder muscle activation levels.

[1]  Marco Senteler,et al.  An integrated model of active glenohumeral stability. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  T. Cook,et al.  Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[3]  Jurandir Nadal,et al.  Isometric fatigue patterns in time and time-frequency domains of triceps surae muscle in different knee positions. , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  Luci Daniels,et al.  Muscle testing; techniques of manual examination , 1986 .

[5]  I. Cathers,et al.  The role of shoulder muscles is task specific. , 2010, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[6]  Peter J Keir,et al.  Obtaining maximum muscle excitation for normalizing shoulder electromyography in dynamic contractions. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[7]  Clark R Dickerson,et al.  Construct Validity of Muscle Force Tests of the Rotator Cuff Muscles: An Electromyographic Investigation , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[8]  D. Cambier,et al.  Scapular Muscle Recruitment Patterns: Trapezius Muscle Latency with and without Impingement Symptoms , 2003, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  I. Cathers,et al.  Standard maximum isometric voluntary contraction tests for normalizing shoulder muscle EMG , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  K. Nagata,et al.  Infraspinatus fatigue during resisted arm elevation with isometric contraction: an electromyographic study. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  A. Pedotti,et al.  Electromyographic signals during gait: Criteria for envelope filtering and number of strides , 1998, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  Brian R. Kotajarvi,et al.  Electromyographic activity in the immobilized shoulder girdle musculature during scapulothoracic exercises. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  Clark R Dickerson,et al.  On the feasibility of obtaining multiple muscular maximal voluntary excitation levels from test exertions: a shoulder example. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[14]  Mark Halaki,et al.  Normalization of EMG Signals: To Normalize or Not to Normalize and What to Normalize to? , 2012 .

[15]  A. Burden.  How should we normalize electromyograms obtained from healthy participants? What we have learned from over 25 years of research. , 2010, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[16]  S. Fischer,et al.  Effect of bilateral versus unilateral exertion tests on maximum voluntary activity and within-participant reproducibility in the shoulder. , 2011, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  A. Cools,et al.  Optimal Normalization Tests for Muscle Activation of the Levator Scapulae, Pectoralis Minor, and Rhomboid Major: An Electromyography Study Using Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contractions. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  Mark Halaki,et al.  Shoulder Muscle Recruitment Patterns During Commonly Used Rotator Cuff Exercises: An Electromyographic Study , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[20]  A D Morris,et al.  A study of the reproducibility of three different normalisation methods in intramuscular dual fine wire electromyography of the shoulder. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[21]  J R Potvin,et al.  A validation of techniques using surface EMG signals from dynamic contractions to quantify muscle fatigue during repetitive tasks. , 1997, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[22]  G. L. Soderberg,et al.  Normalization procedures using maximum voluntary isometric contractions for the serratus anterior and trapezius muscles during surface EMG analysis. , 2005, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[23]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[24]  D. Kirkendall,et al.  Optimal normalization tests for shoulder muscle activation: An electromyographic study , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  M P Kadaba,et al.  Intramuscular wire electromyography of the subscapularis , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[26]  F. E. Delagi.  Anatomical guide for the electromyographer , 2014 .

[27]  Richard J Hawkins,et al.  The belly-press test for the physical examination of the subscapularis muscle: electromyographic validation and comparison to the lift-off test. , 2003, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[28]  Vijaya Krishnamoorthy,et al.  An alternative test of electromyographic normalization in patients , 2006, Muscle & nerve.

[29]  N. Taylor,et al.  The stabilizing role of the rotator cuff at the shoulder--responses to external perturbations. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  M. Halaki,et al.  Revision of the Shoulder Normalization tests is required to include rhomboid major and teres major , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[31]  Anthony J Blazevich,et al.  Knee angle-specific EMG normalization: the use of polynomial based EMG-angle relationships. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[32]  R. Escamilla,et al.  Current concepts in the scientific and clinical rationale behind exercises for glenohumeral and scapulothoracic musculature. , 2009, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[33]  V. Baltzopoulos,et al.  Normalisation of gait EMGs: a re-examination. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.