Improving Configuration and Planning Optimization: Towards a Two Tasks Approach

This paper deals with mass customization and the association of the product configuration task with the planning of its production process while trying to minimize cost and cycle time. Our research aims at producing methods and constraint based tools to support this kind of difficult and constrained prob lem. In some previous works, we have considered an approach that combines interactivity and optimization issues and propose a new specific optimization algorithm, CFB-EA (for constraint filtering based evolutionary algorithm). This article concerns an improvement of the optimization step for large prob lems. Previous experiments have highlighted that CFB-EA is able to find quickly a good approximation of the Pareto Front. This led us to propose to split the optimization step in two sub-steps. First , a “rough” approximation of the Pareto Front is quickl y searched and proposed to the user. Then the user in dicates the area of the Pareto Front that he is int erested in. The problem is filtered in order to rest rain the solution space and a second optimization step i s done only on the focused area. The goal of the arti cle is to compare thanks to various experimentation s the classical single step optimization with the two sub-steps proposed approach.

[1]  Michel Aldanondo,et al.  Concurrent product configuration and process planning, towards an approach combining interactivity and optimality , 2013 .

[2]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.

[3]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Proceedings of the 16th International Configuration Workshop , 2014 .

[4]  Reijo Sulonen,et al.  Towards a general ontology of configuration , 1998, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[5]  Sanjay Mittal,et al.  Towards a Generic Model of Configuraton Tasks , 1989, IJCAI.

[6]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Constraint-handling in nature-inspired numerical optimization: Past, present and future , 2011, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[7]  Toby Walsh,et al.  Handbook of Constraint Programming , 2006, Handbook of Constraint Programming.

[8]  Michel Aldanondo,et al.  Configuration for mass customization: how to extend product configuration towards requirements and process configuration , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[9]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm , 2001 .

[10]  Deyi Xue,et al.  Rapid identification of the optimal product configuration and its parameters based on customer-centric product modeling for one-of-a-kind production , 2010, Comput. Ind..

[11]  Michel Aldanondo,et al.  Generic bill of functions, materials, and operations for SAP2 configuration , 2013 .

[12]  Karsten Schierholt,et al.  Process configuration: Combining the principles of product configuration and process planning , 2000, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[13]  Francesca Rossi,et al.  Constraint satisfaction techniques in planning and scheduling , 2010, J. Intell. Manuf..