Extraordinary interactions between light and matter determined by anomalous weak values

Some predictions regarding pre- and post-selected states are far-reaching, thereby requiring validation with standard quantum measurements in addition to the customary weak measurements used so far, as well as other advanced techniques. We go further pursuing this goal, proposing two thought experiments which incorporate novel yet feasible validation methods of unconventional light-matter interactions. An excited atom traverses a Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) under a special combination of pre- and post-selection. In the first experiment, photons emitted by the superposed atom, after being hit by two laser beams, are individually counted. Despite the interaction having definitely taken place, as revealed by the atom becoming ground, the numbers of photons emitted from each arm of the MZI are predicted, at the ensemble level, to be different from those expected with standard stimulated emission. In the second experiment, the atom spontaneously emits a photon while still in the MZI. This photon later serves as a strong measurement of the atom's energy upon hitting a photographic plate. The experiment is repeated to enable an interference effect of the emitted photons. Interestingly, the latter gives the appearance that the photons have been emitted by the atom from a position much farther from the two MZI arms L and R, as if in a ‘phantom arm’ R′. Nevertheless, their time of arrival is similar to that of photons coming from L and R. These experiments also emphasize the key role of anomalous weak values in determining light–matter interactions. In fact, they present a straightforward realization of an entity we term counter-particles, namely pre- and post-selected states acting as if they have negative physical variables such as mass and energy. The novel verification methods we suggest for testing these predictions resemble weak measurements in some aspects, yet result from definite atomic transitions verified by the detected photons.

[1]  S. Takeuchi,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a quantum shutter closing two slits simultaneously , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[2]  D. Struppa,et al.  Quantum violation of the pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A Tosi,et al.  Measuring Incompatible Observables by Exploiting Sequential Weak Values. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[4]  John C. Howell,et al.  Technical advantages for weak value amplification: When less is more , 2013, 1309.5011.

[5]  Simon Regard,et al.  ["Less is more"]. , 2013, Revue medicale suisse.

[6]  Michael Beny,et al.  Faster than Fourier , 2017 .

[7]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  The Case of the Disappearing (and Re-Appearing) Particle , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Aharon Brodutch,et al.  Nonlocal Measurements via Quantum Erasure. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[9]  Yutaka Shikano,et al.  Strange weak values , 2010, 1006.1615.

[10]  John C. Howell,et al.  Experimentally quantifying the advantages of weak-values-based metrology , 2014, 2015 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[11]  I. Shomroni,et al.  Demonstration of weak measurement based on atomic spontaneous emission. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[12]  Yakir Aharonov,et al.  Quantum Paradoxes: Quantum Theory for the Perplexed , 2005 .

[13]  Vaidman,et al.  How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[14]  Y. Aharonov,et al.  The Two-State Vector Formalism of Quantum Mechanics , 2002 .

[15]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Amplifying single-photon nonlinearity using weak measurements. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[16]  M. Berry,et al.  Typical weak and superweak values , 2010 .

[17]  Michael V Berry,et al.  Evanescent and real waves in quantum billiards and Gaussian beams , 1994 .

[18]  L. Vaidman Comment on "Experimental demonstration of direct path state characterization by strongly measuring weak values in a matter-wave interferometer" , 2017, 1703.01616.

[19]  S. Barnett,et al.  Superweak momentum transfer near optical vortices , 2013 .

[20]  George C. Knee,et al.  When amplification with weak values fails to suppress technical noise , 2013, 1306.6321.

[21]  Nonlocal Position Changes of a Photon Revealed by Quantum Routers , 2017, Scientific reports.

[22]  Aharonov,et al.  Quantum random walks. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[23]  J. Lebowitz,et al.  TIME SYMMETRY IN THE QUANTUM PROCESS OF MEASUREMENT , 1964 .

[24]  L Vaidman,et al.  Asking photons where they have been. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[25]  J. Dressel Weak Values as Interference Phenomena , 2014, 1410.0943.

[26]  J. Dressel,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of Direct Path State Characterization by Strongly Measuring Weak Values in a Matter-Wave Interferometer. , 2016, Physical Review Letters.

[27]  O. Zilberberg,et al.  Charge sensing amplification via weak values measurement. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[28]  A Tosi,et al.  Experiment Investigating the Connection between Weak Values and Contextuality. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[29]  Matthew F Pusey Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[30]  Onur Hosten,et al.  Observation of the Spin Hall Effect of Light via Weak Measurements , 2008, Science.

[31]  Animesh Datta,et al.  Precision metrology using weak measurements. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[32]  R. Jozsa Complex weak values in quantum measurement , 2007, 0706.4207.

[33]  Exact pointer theories for von Neumann projector measurements of pre- and postselected and preselected-only quantum systems: statistical mixtures and weak value persistence , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[34]  The meaning of “anomalous weak values” in quantum and classical theories , 2015, 1509.04925.

[35]  A. Tosi,et al.  Determining the quantum expectation value by measuring a single photon , 2017, Nature Physics.

[36]  B. M. Fulk MATH , 1992 .

[37]  Christopher Ferrie,et al.  Weak value amplification is suboptimal for estimation and detection. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[38]  Christopher Ferrie,et al.  How the result of a single coin toss can turn out to be 100 heads. , 2014, Physical review letters.