Final Report of the MSR Science Planning Group 2 (MSPG2).

The Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign must meet a series of scientific and technical achievements to be successful. While the respective engineering responsibilities to retrieve the samples have been formalized through a Memorandum of Understanding between ESA and NASA, the roles and responsibilities of the scientific elements have yet to be fully defined. In April 2020, ESA and NASA jointly chartered the MSR Science Planning Group 2 (MSPG2) to build upon previous planning efforts in defining 1) an end-to-end MSR Science Program and 2) needed functionalities and design requirements for an MSR Sample Receiving Facility (SRF). The challenges for the first samples brought from another planet include not only maintaining and providing samples in pristine condition for study, but also maintaining biological containment until the samples meet sample safety criteria for distribution outside of biocontainment. The MSPG2 produced six reports outlining 66 findings. Abbreviated versions of the five additional high-level MSPG2 summary findings are: Summary-1. A long-term NASA/ESA MSR Science Program, along with the necessary funding and human resources, will be required to accomplish the end-to-end scientific objectives of MSR. Summary-2. MSR curation will need to be done concurrently with Biosafety Level-4 containment. This would lead to complex first-of-a-kind curation implementations and require further technology development. Summary-3. Most aspects of MSR sample science can, and should, be performed on samples deemed safe in laboratories outside of the SRF. However, other aspects of MSR sample science are both time-sensitive and sterilization-sensitive and would need to be carried out in the SRF. Summary-4. To meet the unique science, curation, and planetary protection needs of MSR, substantial analytical and sample management capabilities would be required in an SRF. Summary-5. Because of the long lead-time for SRF design, construction, and certification, it is important that preparations begin immediately, even if there is delay in the return of samples.

[1]  D. Beaty,et al.  Science and Curation Considerations for the Design of a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Sample Receiving Facility. , 2021, Astrobiology.

[2]  D. Beaty,et al.  The Scientific Importance of Returning Airfall Dust as a Part of Mars Sample Return (MSR). , 2021, Astrobiology.

[3]  D. Beaty,et al.  Preliminary Planning for Mars Sample Return (MSR) Curation Activities in a Sample Receiving Facility. , 2021, Astrobiology.

[4]  D. Beaty,et al.  Time-Sensitive Aspects of Mars Sample Return (MSR) Science. , 2021, Astrobiology.

[5]  D. Beaty,et al.  Rationale and Proposed Design for a Mars Sample Return (MSR) Science Program. , 2021, Astrobiology.

[6]  R. Wiens,et al.  Mars 2020 Mission Overview , 2020, Space Science Reviews.

[7]  A. Harrington,et al.  Tours of high-containment and pristine facilities in support of Mars Sample Return (MSR) Sample Receiving Facility (SRF) definition studies , 2020 .

[8]  Brian K. Muirhead,et al.  Mars Sample Return Mission Concept Status , 2020, 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[9]  D. Beaty,et al.  MSR Science Planning Group (MSPG) Workshop Reports: "The Relationship of Mars Sample Return Science and Containment" & "Science-Driven Contamination Control Issues Associated with the Receiving and Initial Processing of the MSR Samples" , 2019 .

[10]  M. A. Meyer,et al.  MSR Science Planning Group (MSPG) Workshop #1 Report: The Relationship of MSR Science and Containment , 2019 .

[11]  P. Rettberg,et al.  The potential science and engineering value of samples delivered to Earth by Mars sample return , 2019, Meteoritics & Planetary Science.

[12]  Sanjay Vijendran,et al.  Mars Sample Return Architecture Overview , 2018 .

[13]  Raffaele Mugnuolo,et al.  iMARS Phase 2 , 2018, Astrobiology.

[14]  L. Duvet,et al.  ESA Sample Fetch Rover: Heritage and Way Forward , 2018 .

[15]  D. Beaty,et al.  Recommended Maximum Temperature for Mars Returned Samples , 2016 .

[16]  A C Allwood,et al.  Planning considerations related to the organic contamination of Martian samples and implications for the Mars 2020 Rover. , 2014, Astrobiology.

[17]  D. Ming,et al.  Planning Considerations Related to Collecting and Analyzing Samples of the Martian Soils , 2014 .

[18]  C. Allen,et al.  Mars Returned Sample Science: Scientific Planning Related to Sample Quality , 2014 .

[19]  Richard Mattingly,et al.  Mars Sample Return as a campaign , 2011, 2011 Aerospace Conference.